• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Report: Swastikas found in apartment of Las Vegas cop killers[W:251]

How would that picture indicate that these people were right wingers?

I'd suggest any political science textbook. I think it would give you a pretty good definition of right wing v. left wing. At the extreme ends of the spectrum there's not a lot of difference. Generally speaking, however, if you are anti-government and think government is controlled by the Jews, you display swastikas, and consider cops fair game,you're right wing. Left wing tends to demand more government, not less.
 
Hint to progressives - white supremacists don't throw around Swastikas - unless they're Nazi's which I highly doubt they were.

Actually they do, in tribute to the greatest white supremacist of them all, Adolph Hitler. Hell, they even celebrate Adolph's birthday.
 
Are you kidding? the way these nuts act? they gotta be on some kind of hallucinogen acting the way they do, normal people just don't do **** like confront federal officers or employees or bomb BLM and other government offices. As for bundy, he probably smokes peyote and drinks mescal, lord knows HE AIN'T NORMAL.

Yes sir...let's legalize all these mind altering drugs. That's the ticket. Forget all that other **** I said before. Legalize hallucinogens...that's the only way to go. Make 'em even easier to obtain.
 
If he didn't follow it, how could he then as Gipper stated be a "HUGE Christian"?

I don't think he was a HUGE Christian at all. Taking his actions and statements as a whole, I wouldn't call him any kind of Christian.

He was nominally Catholic though.
 
It is endlessly frustrating for me that when a person who is vaguely left-wing does something negative, it is painted as "all those liberals" and then connected to Obama. Yet when someone is vagely right-wing, it's all "this has nothing to do with politics" and any associations to anyone on the right (like Bundy) are quickly ignored.

I expect you to do this next time a lefty does something, but I won't hold my breath.

if you don't like it when the other side does it, why do you ...continually.. do the same thing?

sorry man, you don't get ot whine about behavior you yourself engage in on a regular basis.
 
......The suspects had some kind of ideology of "anti-police and anti-government," said McMahill.

"We don’t necessarily believe that they were white supremacists,” he said. Instead, "they believed that law enforcement is the oppressor" — like Nazis.

After Officers Lyn Beck, 41, and Igor Soldo, 31, were fatally shot while they were eating at CiCi's Pizza on their lunch break, their bodies were pulled from their booth and onto the ground, said McMahill.

Both were then covered with their own yellow Gadsden flag, which features a coiled snake and the words, “Don’t Tread on Me” — a symbol most recently adopted by the Tea Party movement in 2009.

McMahill said Jerad Miller also placed a note featuring a swastika on Soldo’s body, “that basically said that this is the beginning of a revolution.”
......

Read more: Las Vegas cop-killing couple left swastika-stamped manifesto on officer's body, previously warned of Columbine killing: report - NY Daily News

:screwy
 
Just some food for thought....Look at the big city Democratic strongholds and their police dept. tactics of "Stop and Frisk". S&F is guided mostly toward minorities and keeping them in place. The Democratic Slave Plantation is falling apart, minorities are waking up to the lies from the Democrats such as "vote for us we have your best interest in place". When law abiding citizens of any color have their Rights violated by the "Protect and Serve" jack booted thugs we all have to speak up, Republican or Democrat. I for one want to keep my right of keeping my guns. I have owned guns for over 40 years and not once have they ever walked out the door on their own and shot anyone.

If that passes as 'food for thought' a few minds are damn near starved to death... :mrgreen:

There must be a CON website with your post verbatim for quick throwing into any and all CON arguments. Big City DEM strongholds are in many cases a default position as CONs really didn't care much about 'the masses' and except for the Financial sector and 'Nob Hill' have little interest in big cities.

I get a good laugh out of the CON name using 'democratic slave plantation' as if CONs would throw open their gated enclaves to minorities out in exurbia. How sad and sick the mind who thinks it is the DEMs keeping a plantation system when CONs only offer cutting off social services but not offering a job to the millions in big cities they fled years ago. (a few really twisted CONs would offer the children a 'opportunity' to clean their own schools but nothing for the parents) So while some CONs claim they have to hold their nose to vote for a RINO vs a DEM, minorities have no such hesitation, they know CONs could care less what happens to the inner cities once you leave the financial district and before you hit the car dealerships and mega malls.

What waking minorities are doing is realizing the majority has little if any concern for the abandoned inner cities and absolutely no plans on revitalizing urban areas unless they are displaced. if you know any majority folks who work downtown the vast majority live an hour's drive outside of town and spend 2 hours each way going to work. They don't vote in the inner city, why would a CON politician give a damn about the inner city except to bait the majority folks who don't live there????

Jack booted thugs.... ahhh a good one! more rote CON jingoism, be it out in the Nevada desert or during the desperate search for the Boston Marathon bombers. :doh

Fact is CONs, since Uncle Ron's day, have demanded harsher and swifter 'justice' for folks they were afraid of (Mulford Act) until it splashed on them or looked too 'military'. How quickly CONs forget THEY demanded looser requirements on searches, and on warrant service so those bad ol' drug dealers quit getting away with crime because the police were hamstrung by LIB Judges... (Now of course the CON whine is the LIBS are behind the tougher laws)

Firearm regulations are up for discussion, on the one hand every home should be able to use a firearm for defense, but guys like Elliot, a very mentally disturbed young man, should never had the ability to buy 1 much less 3 weapons, the law says must be hospitalized to be banned from buying a weapon- that needs to change, it should be diagnosed with.... and a list of problems.

The 'my weapon never walked out the door to kill someone' CON crap is another rote CON deflection. Fact is a woman was murdered in her own home with her own weapon that was then used to shoot grade school children- they weren't bangers having a drug war, but tiny little children learning their ABCs and 123's. On it's own a weapon is no more incapable of getting into the wrong hands as staying 'well behaved'. Big part of the problem.

Just an FYI, I grew up hunting, carried a mattel toy for Uncla Sugah, own a few firearms, been an Instructor (NOT NRA), and still enjoy hunting my own land.
 
Did I SAYI was presenting a swastika?
Nope, I said I was presenting a VENN DIAGRAM, and if you understood how Venn diagrams work,
you would see the overlap between the various white supremacist groups depicted IN the Venn diagram.

But you didn't because you are apparently unable to understand them.

I really could care less that you've never met a Nazi, but if you say you never met one and then
you carry on about how much you know about them, doesn't that make you look a little bit ridiculous?

Yeah, it does ...:lamo

You do realize not all supremacist groups share the same politics, hence attempting to brand them all the same is basically ignorant?

It would be like generalizing republicans, socialists, libertarians and democrats into one - calling them politicians.

You do realize these "sects" generally don't like one another.
 
If that passes as 'food for thought' a few minds are damn near starved to death... :mrgreen:

There must be a CON website with your post verbatim for quick throwing into any and all CON arguments. Big City DEM strongholds are in many cases a default position as CONs really didn't care much about 'the masses' and except for the Financial sector and 'Nob Hill' have little interest in big cities.

I get a good laugh out of the CON name using 'democratic slave plantation' as if CONs would throw open their gated enclaves to minorities out in exurbia. How sad and sick the mind who thinks it is the DEMs keeping a plantation system when CONs only offer cutting off social services but not offering a job to the millions in big cities they fled years ago. (a few really twisted CONs would offer the children a 'opportunity' to clean their own schools but nothing for the parents) So while some CONs claim they have to hold their nose to vote for a RINO vs a DEM, minorities have no such hesitation, they know CONs could care less what happens to the inner cities once you leave the financial district and before you hit the car dealerships and mega malls.

What waking minorities are doing is realizing the majority has little if any concern for the abandoned inner cities and absolutely no plans on revitalizing urban areas unless they are displaced. if you know any majority folks who work downtown the vast majority live an hour's drive outside of town and spend 2 hours each way going to work. They don't vote in the inner city, why would a CON politician give a damn about the inner city except to bait the majority folks who don't live there????

Jack booted thugs.... ahhh a good one! more rote CON jingoism, be it out in the Nevada desert or during the desperate search for the Boston Marathon bombers. :doh

Fact is CONs, since Uncle Ron's day, have demanded harsher and swifter 'justice' for folks they were afraid of (Mulford Act) until it splashed on them or looked too 'military'. How quickly CONs forget THEY demanded looser requirements on searches, and on warrant service so those bad ol' drug dealers quit getting away with crime because the police were hamstrung by LIB Judges... (Now of course the CON whine is the LIBS are behind the tougher laws)

Firearm regulations are up for discussion, on the one hand every home should be able to use a firearm for defense, but guys like Elliot, a very mentally disturbed young man, should never had the ability to buy 1 much less 3 weapons, the law says must be hospitalized to be banned from buying a weapon- that needs to change, it should be diagnosed with.... and a list of problems.

The 'my weapon never walked out the door to kill someone' CON crap is another rote CON deflection. Fact is a woman was murdered in her own home with her own weapon that was then used to shoot grade school children- they weren't bangers having a drug war, but tiny little children learning their ABCs and 123's. On it's own a weapon is no more incapable of getting into the wrong hands as staying 'well behaved'. Big part of the problem.

Just an FYI, I grew up hunting, carried a mattel toy for Uncla Sugah, own a few firearms, been an Instructor (NOT NRA), and still enjoy hunting my own land.

You made a stronger case than I did about the Democratic Slave Plantation. Thanks !!!!!. Don't you people ever read what you write or think about what you write before you hit "enter"?
 
If that passes as 'food for thought' a few minds are damn near starved to death... :mrgreen:

There must be a CON website with your post verbatim for quick throwing into any and all CON arguments. Big City DEM strongholds are in many cases a default position as CONs really didn't care much about 'the masses' and except for the Financial sector and 'Nob Hill' have little interest in big cities.

I get a good laugh out of the CON name using 'democratic slave plantation' as if CONs would throw open their gated enclaves to minorities out in exurbia. How sad and sick the mind who thinks it is the DEMs keeping a plantation system when CONs only offer cutting off social services but not offering a job to the millions in big cities they fled years ago. (a few really twisted CONs would offer the children a 'opportunity' to clean their own schools but nothing for the parents) So while some CONs claim they have to hold their nose to vote for a RINO vs a DEM, minorities have no such hesitation, they know CONs could care less what happens to the inner cities once you leave the financial district and before you hit the car dealerships and mega malls.

What waking minorities are doing is realizing the majority has little if any concern for the abandoned inner cities and absolutely no plans on revitalizing urban areas unless they are displaced. if you know any majority folks who work downtown the vast majority live an hour's drive outside of town and spend 2 hours each way going to work. They don't vote in the inner city, why would a CON politician give a damn about the inner city except to bait the majority folks who don't live there????

Jack booted thugs.... ahhh a good one! more rote CON jingoism, be it out in the Nevada desert or during the desperate search for the Boston Marathon bombers. :doh

Fact is CONs, since Uncle Ron's day, have demanded harsher and swifter 'justice' for folks they were afraid of (Mulford Act) until it splashed on them or looked too 'military'. How quickly CONs forget THEY demanded looser requirements on searches, and on warrant service so those bad ol' drug dealers quit getting away with crime because the police were hamstrung by LIB Judges... (Now of course the CON whine is the LIBS are behind the tougher laws)

Firearm regulations are up for discussion, on the one hand every home should be able to use a firearm for defense, but guys like Elliot, a very mentally disturbed young man, should never had the ability to buy 1 much less 3 weapons, the law says must be hospitalized to be banned from buying a weapon- that needs to change, it should be diagnosed with.... and a list of problems.

The 'my weapon never walked out the door to kill someone' CON crap is another rote CON deflection. Fact is a woman was murdered in her own home with her own weapon that was then used to shoot grade school children- they weren't bangers having a drug war, but tiny little children learning their ABCs and 123's. On it's own a weapon is no more incapable of getting into the wrong hands as staying 'well behaved'. Big part of the problem.

Just an FYI, I grew up hunting, carried a mattel toy for Uncla Sugah, own a few firearms, been an Instructor (NOT NRA), and still enjoy hunting my own land.

Give me a break - do you actually believe conservatives support these white supremacist groups? and do you actually believe these organizations actually support conservative ideology?

Ironically its the black nationalist groups that proudly support the democratic/progressive party.

White supremacist groups are a breed of their own - they're not even mainstream political - they have their own agenda from Eugenics to socialism. There isn't much if any cohesion in the White Supremacist movement - at least not in the United States, however there is massive cohesion amongst the black supremacist groups in the United States...I have no idea how the New Black Panther Party (and their offshoots) are NOT labeled along side the KKK or the Neo Nazi's..

Of course we all have opinions but to automatically hate someone who is black or white is total nonsense and pure ignorance.
 
The Liberal Mantra of "Blame Whitey, Blame Righty" is getting very lame.
 
It is endlessly frustrating for me that when a person who is vaguely left-wing does something negative, it is painted as "all those liberals" and then connected to Obama. Yet when someone is vagely right-wing, it's all "this has nothing to do with politics" and any associations to anyone on the right (like Bundy) are quickly ignored.

I expect you to do this next time a lefty does something, but I won't hold my breath.

You're expecting an awful lot from a CONTARD.
Yep, I went there :lamo
 
Hitler, other than ultra-Christian tendencies, was pretty left-wing. These guys are anarchists - the epitome of the left-wing. Them having swastikas makes them prone to hatred and shock value.

Nope.
 
You made a stronger case than I did about the Democratic Slave Plantation. Thanks !!!!!. Don't you people ever read what you write or think about what you write before you hit "enter"?

Democrats were the ones who perpetuated slavery and even segregation and the so called "Jim Crow" laws up until the late 50's and even into the civil rights movement of the 60's especially in the south...

I don't even know how democrats today can seriously consider themselves the party of "tolerance" when they were the party of violence and the KKK for at least 100 years...

What many don't know is that the republicans continued to push a civil rights act for nearly 15-years and it was denied every time by democrats, until democrats figured out they could use blacks instead of oppressing them - then FINALLY legislation - wrote and manifested by democrats got passed....

Everyone who knows a damn thing about history knows the democrats are, were and still are the plantation owners - they just abused and used blacks in different ways over the years - noting has really changed.
 
And to return the favor...

View attachment 67167860

A Dixiecrat? HAHAHAHAHAHA! That's beautiful, too bad it's so easy to trace the history of the "Southern Strategy" which,
to quote LBJ, "lost the South for a generation". He was referring to the fact that signing the Civil Rights Act would turn the South from Dixiecrat to Republican, and Nixon capitalized on that very reality.

When Democrats in the East, Northeast, North, and West aligned themselves with the civil rights movement it left the Dixiecrats as a rudderless ship which found itself being welcomed by the Republicans.

This proves that you not only swallowed the current pop-psy revisionism whole, it also confirms that you're in denial about historical fact regarding the Old South.
How old are you, seventeen? I could forgive this if you're just a youngster. (you don't know any better)
But if you were born before 1980, you're full on trolling.
 
Democrats were the ones who perpetuated slavery and even segregation and the so called "Jim Crow" laws up until the late 50's and even into the civil rights movement of the 60's especially in the south...

I don't even know how democrats today can seriously consider themselves the party of "tolerance" when they were the party of violence and the KKK for at least 100 years...

What many don't know is that the republicans continued to push a civil rights act for nearly 15-years and it was denied every time by democrats, until democrats figured out they could use blacks instead of oppressing them - then FINALLY legislation - wrote and manifested by democrats got passed....

Everyone who knows a damn thing about history knows the democrats are, were and still are the plantation owners - they just abused and used blacks in different ways over the years - noting has really changed.

Yet another conservative who twists history to fit his theory.

FYI, those racist Dems were CONSERVATIVES every one. If you'll check your history, after the Civil War and the until the early 1900's, many Republicans were socially LIBERAL in the context of the day. In fact, the Civil Rights Act could not have been passed without liberal Republicans...and it was passed over the rabid objections of conservative Democrats. If you'd check, the South was for generations the Democratic "Solid South"...but after the CRA was passed, the racists in the South blamed the Democratic party and turned to the Republican party...which Nixon embraced with his "Southern Strategy". And that, sir, is why the South is solid red today.

The one place in America more racist than any other has always been the Deep South (and don't get me started - I was raised there and know it very well). The Deep South - ground zero for racism in America - may have been solidly Democratic and is now solidly Republican...but it was always, always, ALWAYS strongly CONSERVATIVE. Always has been. Always will be.
 
What a wonderfully intellectual and contemplative response! Tell me, do you know anything about the origins of Fascism? I have a feeling that you have no clue about its origins or its underlying ideology. Fascism and its variants differ from traditional left-wing ideology primarily in their attitudes towards nations and races. Most of the other elements of left-wing ideology are present. I don't consider it a mark against the left generally any more than I consider the Klan to be a mark against libertarianism or state's rights. However, you can't shove your head in the sand and act like your beliefs have never and could never be perverted in much the same way as those of your opponents.

There is nothing left wing about fascism, and any attempt to link it to the Left finds one running head on into
quotes by one of Fascism's most notable authors:

"The Liberal State is a mask behind which there is no face; it is a scaffolding behind which there is no building."

"Socialism is a fraud, a comedy, a phantom, a blackmail."

"Fascism is a religious concept."

“The National Council of Corporations [Consiglio Nazionale delle Corporazioni] is to the Italian economy what the Chief of Staff is to the Army: the thinking brain that prepares and coordinates.”

You will note that I did not dredge up Aaron Russo's falsely attributed "Fascism should be more right called corporatism because it is the merger of corporate and state power" however I will be more than happy to dredge through my collection of Mussolini's writings and supply a very hearty equivalent summation.
It's just not going to be distilled into a snappy sounding one liner.

Fascism's record is that of rent-seeking, corporate favors for government friends of big business, powerful and all consuming nationalism bound up in idealistic campaigns that promote ethnic and racial purity, militarism and misogny.

Corporate groups are social classes in a fascist economy, hence the reason why it is so important to regard corporations not as collections of people but as A PERSON.
If you wish to call it inverse socialism or inverted socialism, go ahead.

But it's not leftist. It's not even remotely liberal.
 
you actually sound unhinged.

My point is that you can't simply see what people have in their personal effects to make a conclusion of motive. Crazy people use things to justify their actions. But you want to live in your delusion that is totally up to you. Oh and do people make Bob Dole t-shirts?

sounds like you have an Obama poster and a YES WE CAN 2008 bumper sticker
 
Democrats were the ones who perpetuated slavery and even segregation and the so called "Jim Crow" laws up until the late 50's and even into the civil rights movement of the 60's especially in the south...

I don't even know how democrats today can seriously consider themselves the party of "tolerance" when they were the party of violence and the KKK for at least 100 years...

What many don't know is that the republicans continued to push a civil rights act for nearly 15-years and it was denied every time by democrats, until democrats figured out they could use blacks instead of oppressing them - then FINALLY legislation - wrote and manifested by democrats got passed....

Everyone who knows a damn thing about history knows the democrats are, were and still are the plantation owners - they just abused and used blacks in different ways over the years - noting has really changed.

Great post Nick..
 
A Dixiecrat? HAHAHAHAHAHA! That's beautiful, too bad it's so easy to trace the history of the "Southern Strategy" which,
to quote LBJ, "lost the South for a generation". He was referring to the fact that signing the Civil Rights Act would turn the South from Dixiecrat to Republican, and Nixon capitalized on that very reality.

When Democrats in the East, Northeast, North, and West aligned themselves with the civil rights movement it left the Dixiecrats as a rudderless ship which found itself being welcomed by the Republicans.

This proves that you not only swallowed the current pop-psy revisionism whole, it also confirms that you're in denial about historical fact regarding the Old South.
How old are you, seventeen? I could forgive this if you're just a youngster. (you don't know any better)
But if you were born before 1980, you're full on trolling.

Geesus H. Christ...Kleagle and Democrat Robert Byrd LEAD A FILIBUSTER TO STOP THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964.

I am from the 'old South' junior, and I'm 72 years old. I have no idea what the hell you thought you were contesting...but you sure were beating up the wrong tree.

Who Opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964? | Stan Collender's Capital Gains and Games

excerpt

That all the participants knew this only goes to show how deep their racism was. It’s one thing to engage in a filibuster if there is even a glimmer of hope that something might be salvaged as a result. But serious commitment is required to take such action when one knows that ultimate failure is the only conceivable outcome. This fact should be kept in mind when thinking about people like Senator Robert C. Byrd, Democrat of West Virginia, whose individual filibuster of the 1964 civil rights bill is the second longest in history, taking up eighty-six pages of fine print in the Congressional Record. Only a true believer would ever undertake such a futile effort.

A similar story is told in the Senate. On the critical vote to end the filibuster by Southern Democrats, 71 senators voted to invoke cloture. With 67 votes needed, 44 Democrats and 27 Republicans joined together to bring the bill to a final vote. Of those voting “nay,” 80 percent were Democrats, including Robert C. Byrd and former Vice President Al Gore’s father, who was then a senator from Tennessee. Again, it is clear that the civil rights bill would have failed without Republican votes.
 
Didn't LBJ say that "I will have these NI@@ERS voting Democrat for 100 years" after he signed the Civil Rights Act? The beginning of the New Democratic Slave Plantation..
 
Back
Top Bottom