• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

No Evidence of ‘Credible Threat’ to Bergdahl: Feinstein

Deflect deflect deflect

What? You proved my point. You don't care about source, whether it's someone you've disparaged in the past as a useless liar or king kong. You're only interested in pushing your narrative.

As I suspected.

Case closed.
 
What? You proved my point. You don't care about source, whether it's someone you've disparaged in the past as a useless liar or king kong. You're only interested in pushing your narrative.

As I suspected.

Case closed.

You cant attack the nature of the truth That HE LIED again. so your next plan is to attack the source?
:applaud:stooges:sinking:
 
No Evidence of

The Senate Intelligence Committee chairwoman said she’s not convinced there was a “credible threat” against the life of freed Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl that motivated the White House to keep its plans secret.

“I don’t think there was a credible threat,” U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein said in an interview yesterday for Bloomberg Television’s “Political Capital with Al Hunt” airing this weekend. “I have no information that there was.”

Senators were told at a June 4 classified briefing that President Barack Obama’s administration had received indications that Bergdahl’s life could be jeopardized if the detainee exchange proceedings were disclosed or derailed, according to a government official who sought anonymity.


Imagine that ANOTHER LIE from the liar in chief. I am not shocked any more.

I don't think any of us can be shocked with anything Mr Obama says anymore, it sort of a status quo with him.

Mr Obama's febble excuse of not sharing the deal of Berghahl's trade with Sen. Dianne Feinstein and Sen. Saxby Chambliss doesn't hold water considering, they both knew of the plan to take down bin Laden for months without a leak.
 
You cant attack the nature of the truth That HE LIED again. so your next plan is to attack the source?
:applaud:stooges:sinking:

I'm not attacking the source. I'm noting your TOTAL disregard for sources, which renders your OP funny. Clearly, your OP is only interested in pushing a narrative; you admitted it.
 
I'm not attacking the source. I'm noting your TOTAL disregard for sources, which renders your OP funny. Clearly, your OP is only interested in pushing a narrative; you admitted it.

:roll:
 

You said you would post the claim even if it was from king kong. How does that NOT illustrate your complete disregard for source and commitment to a narrative?
 
What does the Left want? Is Obama Jesus or is Obama Caesar?

the reason why i bring up the musical is because there is a specific scene that reminds me of the extremely politicized criticism that the president is receiving.

i will give you a hint: it matchs the intensity of the mob shouting during the trial of Jesus Christ by Pontius Pilate.

here is the specific scene from the 1973 movie.

Are you equating Obama with Jesus? If so do you recognize that the Scribes and Pharasees agreed that "for the sake of the nation this Jesus must die?"

Or, are you really saying...
"We have no King but Caesar Obamus."

It is so hard to know the thoughts of the Left.
 
the reason why i bring up the musical is because there is a specific scene that reminds me of the extremely politicized criticism that the president is receiving.

i will give you a hint: it matchs the intensity of the mob shouting during the trial of Jesus christ by Pontius pilate.

here is the specific scene from the 1973 movie.




Are we comparing the Republicans to the crowd? Or Barack Obama to Jesus Christ?
 
Are we comparing the Republicans to the crowd? Or Barack Obama to Jesus Christ?

Am sadly assuming his answer will be "both".....
 
No Evidence of

The Senate Intelligence Committee chairwoman said she’s not convinced there was a “credible threat” against the life of freed Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl that motivated the White House to keep its plans secret.

“I don’t think there was a credible threat,” U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein said in an interview yesterday for Bloomberg Television’s “Political Capital with Al Hunt” airing this weekend. “I have no information that there was.”

Senators were told at a June 4 classified briefing that President Barack Obama’s administration had received indications that Bergdahl’s life could be jeopardized if the detainee exchange proceedings were disclosed or derailed, according to a government official who sought anonymity.


Imagine that ANOTHER LIE from the liar in chief. I am not shocked any more.

I don't believe so either, however it was quite obvious that this administration was willing to give an arm and a leg to get him back - and now some are even speculating money was involved.

Either way the trade was horrible.

When you're a solider you sign up for this possibility - If I was in that young mans shoes I would have eaten a bullet before I let a terrorist organization take me alive.

Survival is one thing but patriotism is another. If this man did in fact dessert his post and just ran off - he belongs in jail for several years - and my honest feeling is that is if that is the case - no trade should have been made and the idiot could deal with the own consequences of his actions - even if that meant death via Islamic ritualistic death, which would either be a beheading or stoning.

Either way I would have handled the situation a lot differently.

I would have told these terrorists, I would kill the 5 they wanted plus another 5 if the man wasn't returned and if that failed I would promise drastic military action/presence in the region they're operating in.

Sometimes you have to have to show your balls or mite to get your way. We held all the cards yet Obama being the ***** he is folded his hand.
 
He was.



Taliban propaganda believed by the same right wing who didn't believe their nonsense before 2008.

He was " captured " after he deserted and then asked the locals where the Taliban was.

By 2010 the Pentagon KNEW HE WAS A DESERTER.
 
He was " captured " after he deserted and then asked the locals where the Taliban was.

By 2010 the Pentagon KNEW HE WAS A DESERTER.
I don't know about you but I am looking forward to next week's explanation(s).
 
I don't know about you but I am looking forward to next week's explanation(s).

Bergdahl was a CIA plant the whole time, even when he was on base, and was captured when a CIA deal with the Taliban went bad.

He didn't " desert " he walked off under CIA orders.

And because its all CIA nothing more can be said

That's my guess...

Hey, that was fun. We should start a thread and guess the Obama administrations next line of BS.
 
Are we comparing the Republicans to the crowd? Or Barack Obama to Jesus Christ?

Obama has been worshiped as the new Messiah by many on the left since he was elected in 2008, so I think that's exactly the comparison being made... What else could explain their "cult like" blind allegiance for the man and defense of him through screw up after screw up, scandal after scandal and lie after lie?
 
Obama has been worshiped as the new Messiah by many on the left since he was elected in 2008, so I think that's exactly the comparison being made... What else could explain their "cult like" blind allegiance for the man and defense of him through screw up after screw up, scandal after scandal and lie after lie?

Most die hard of either major party will defend their man regardless of what he does or scandal that breaks. After all, as president he is the leader of your party. One can be mad as heck at your man in private or among fellow party members, but once out in public, you're defending him to the max. Reading the different posts here on DP, right, wrong or indifferent you will pretty much find the same people defending Obama regardless of what he does. The same goes for the Republicans and them defending Bush the second and Reagan regardless of what they did. It is the nature of politics, the die hards of either party protect and defend their own.
 
This is why I have never been a member of any party.
 
Always impressed with the number of die-hard Republican posters who claim to be independents.
Especially since they were for Bergdahl's release before the 2012 election.
Now, not so much .
 
Always impressed with the number of die-hard Republican posters who claim to be independents.
Especially since they were for Bergdahl's release before the 2012 election.
Now, not so much .

Being for Bergdahl\s release is one thing but let's have a look at one of those who Obama saw fit to release. Are you okay with this? http://wikileaks.org/gitmo/pdf/af/us9af-000006dp.pdf

Note this especially.
a. (S) Assessment: Detainee is assessed to be a HIGH risk, as he is likely to pose a threat to the US, its interests and allies.
 
No Evidence of

The Senate Intelligence Committee chairwoman said she’s not convinced there was a “credible threat” against the life of freed Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl that motivated the White House to keep its plans secret.

“I don’t think there was a credible threat,” U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein said in an interview yesterday for Bloomberg Television’s “Political Capital with Al Hunt” airing this weekend. “I have no information that there was.”

Senators were told at a June 4 classified briefing that President Barack Obama’s administration had received indications that Bergdahl’s life could be jeopardized if the detainee exchange proceedings were disclosed or derailed, according to a government official who sought anonymity.


Imagine that ANOTHER LIE from the liar in chief. I am not shocked any more.

I don't see him as a threat, however he is certainly if he wants can ask some interesting questions.... Personally I would plead the Fifth. however thats what progressives use tp imply guilt - without any due process.

I personally don't believe the media has any interest at all making the Obama as US can be.....

Remember to to the elitist progressive you're just an redneck - like the movies portray "if you talk 'stupid' in a southern accent everything thAT BEFALLS YOU IS AWESOMENESS BUT WHAT ABUT THE KIDS -- Oh yeah they're considered "rednecks" and not just idiots but potential 3rd generation racists....
 
Imagine that ANOTHER LIE from the liar in chief. I am not shocked any more.

On the other hand, what difference does it make, if there was a threat? You don't negotiate with terrorists and even fold to their demands.
And it is doubtful statesmanship to infringe on the power of Congress without even convincing cause for one individual.
 
No surprise. Typical bs. Alaskan Bush People for lifestyle win. If it wasn't for the green apple slush. I hate politics.
 
No Evidence of

The Senate Intelligence Committee chairwoman said she’s not convinced there was a “credible threat” against the life of freed Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl that motivated the White House to keep its plans secret.

“I don’t think there was a credible threat,” U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein said in an interview yesterday for Bloomberg Television’s “Political Capital with Al Hunt” airing this weekend. “I have no information that there was.”

Senators were told at a June 4 classified briefing that President Barack Obama’s administration had received indications that Bergdahl’s life could be jeopardized if the detainee exchange proceedings were disclosed or derailed, according to a government official who sought anonymity.


Imagine that ANOTHER LIE from the liar in chief. I am not shocked any more.

And many more to come...This administration is built on lies...They don't even see it as wrong to do...
 
Back
Top Bottom