Page 47 of 53 FirstFirst ... 374546474849 ... LastLast
Results 461 to 470 of 524

Thread: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287:411]

  1. #461
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:17 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,818

    Re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287:411]

    Quote Originally Posted by Paleocon View Post
    I'm sure whatever you posted was very nice.
    Translation: you have nothing.

    Please provide factual evidence that your arguments are not subjective and matter to SS/Equal rights.
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  2. #462
    Sage
    Hatuey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:08 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    42,056

    Re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]

    Quote Originally Posted by Paleocon View Post
    The act must at least be open to procreation.
    Ah, so then a couple who uses contraception, knowing full well that there is a possibility that it might fail, is not engaging in an unnatural act because there is a possibility that it may lead to procreation?
    I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality. - MLK

  3. #463
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Last Seen
    06-30-16 @ 07:32 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    13,309
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]

    Quote Originally Posted by Hatuey View Post
    Ah, so then a couple who uses contraception, knowing full well that there is a possibility that it might fail, is not engaging in an unnatural act because there is a possibility that it may lead to procreation?
    No, because they are performing an act which by nature has the purpose of frustrating procreation.

  4. #464
    Sage
    Hatuey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:08 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    42,056

    Re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]

    Quote Originally Posted by Paleocon View Post
    No, because they are performing an act which by nature has the purpose of frustrating procreation.
    Alright, so abstaining from having sex would be considered unnatural as it impedes procreation. Yes?
    I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality. - MLK

  5. #465
    Advisor
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Chicago, Suburbs
    Last Seen
    06-27-14 @ 12:07 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    307

    Re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]

    Quote Originally Posted by Hatuey View Post
    Alright, so abstaining from having sex would be considered unnatural as it impedes procreation. Yes?
    Yep logical llama is logical.

  6. #466
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Last Seen
    06-30-16 @ 07:32 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    13,309
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]

    Quote Originally Posted by Hatuey View Post
    Alright, so abstaining from having sex would be considered unnatural as it impedes procreation. Yes?
    Abstaining is an omission, not an act.

  7. #467
    Sage
    Hatuey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:08 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    42,056

    Re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]

    Quote Originally Posted by Paleocon View Post
    Abstaining is an omission, not an act.
    To abstain is to refrain from doing enjoying something. It is most definitely an act.
    I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality. - MLK

  8. #468
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Last Seen
    06-13-15 @ 10:52 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,460

    Re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    Less unnatural.



    Mental Gymnastics Gold Medalist Paleocon, everybody.
    What century do some of these people think they live in?

  9. #469
    Supreme knower of all
    CLAX1911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Houston, in the great state of Texas
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:39 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    25,208

    Re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]

    Quote Originally Posted by Paleocon View Post
    No, because they are performing an act which by nature has the purpose of frustrating procreation.
    I am surprised nobody hs said this to you yet. You are arguing a fallacious point. Argumentum ad naturam is logical fallacy.

    Basically you are arguing something being good or bad based on it being natural or unnatural.

    The fact that something is natural doesn't make it good. Example:
    A grizzly bear naturally defends it's cubs should the bear perceive a threat. If your presence is perceived as a threat than you will no doubt become that bear's business. Definitely not good. Something isn't bad simply because it is unnatural. Example: a train track is man made though it allows food to be moved across the country in places where they have no agriculture.

    So, arguing that something is or isn't good based on it being natural or unnatural is a fallacy.
    It's okay to be white

  10. #470
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Seen
    08-29-17 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    16,575

    Re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]

    Quote Originally Posted by Paleocon View Post
    Abstaining is an omission, not an act.
    The act of omission is in fact an act.

Page 47 of 53 FirstFirst ... 374546474849 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •