Page 10 of 53 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 524

Thread: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287:411]

  1. #91
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Chicago
    Last Seen
    10-30-14 @ 12:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    7,908

    re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]

    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban

    The key part:



    Use of the term gender instead of orientation could be important for future rulings. Have not read the ruling itself yet so take the reporting for what it is worth.
    Regardless of my position on gay marriage - judges are not legislators - yet the idiot us public actually believes they are.

    The real question is gay marriage legal?

    One judge cannot determine that.

    Ironically wasn't it Clinton who instituted DOMA either through resolution or legislation?

  2. #92
    Liberal Fascist For Life!


    Redress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:47 PM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    93,315
    Blog Entries
    2

    re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Nick View Post
    Regardless of my position on gay marriage - judges are not legislators - yet the idiot us public actually believes they are.

    The real question is gay marriage legal?

    One judge cannot determine that.
    A judge absolutely can determine if a law is constitutional or not. In fact they are the arbiters of that.

    Ironically wasn't it Clinton who instituted DOMA either through resolution or legislation?
    It was Clinton who signed the law, and it was a mistake.
    We became a great nation not because we are a nation of cynics. We became a great nation because we are a nation of believers - Lindsey Graham

    Quote Originally Posted by Fiddytree View Post
    Uh oh Megyn...your vagina witchcraft is about ready to be exposed.

  3. #93
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:06 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,795

    re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Nick View Post
    1.)Regardless of my position on gay marriage - judges are not legislators - yet the idiot us public actually believes they are.
    2.)The real question is gay marriage legal?
    3.)One judge cannot determine that.
    4.)
    Ironically wasn't it Clinton who instituted DOMA either through resolution or legislation?
    1.) good thing nobody claimed there are just legislators used the argument that they are
    2.) no thats not a question at all really, the question is does the state have the power to infringing on individual rights and treat certain members as second class citizens based on heter/homo sexual orientation.

    thats the real question and the law, rights, judges and constitution says the state cant so the fed is fixing this error.

    3.) good thing no judge did
    4.) why is this ironic? lol
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  4. #94
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Chicago
    Last Seen
    10-30-14 @ 12:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    7,908

    re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]

    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    A judge absolutely can determine if a law is constitutional or not. In fact they are the arbiters of that.



    It was Clinton who signed the law, and it was a mistake.

    Wrong the SCOTUS will have to handle this ruling based on challenge which I assume will be coming.

    As far as DOMA, that could potentially be an obstacle and has been before, which I find ironic considering a lot of those who support gay marriage think/thought Clinton was the best thing since sliced bread until Obama showed his ugly face.

  5. #95
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Chicago
    Last Seen
    10-30-14 @ 12:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    7,908

    re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]

    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post
    1.) good thing nobody claimed there are just legislators used the argument that they are
    2.) no thats not a question at all really, the question is does the state have the power to infringing on individual rights and treat certain members as second class citizens based on heter/homo sexual orientation.

    thats the real question and the law, rights, judges and constitution says the state cant so the fed is fixing this error.

    3.) good thing no judge did
    4.) why is this ironic? lol
    You cant even write a paragraph in a formal format, yet you want me to take your "points" seriously..

    I hope someone teaches you a grammar lesson.

    We don't number. When making points that we wish not to argue or are just questions we use:

    -
    -
    -
    -

    Instead of 1, 2 or 3.

    I understand your concerns but they are just not addressed properly.

    You need help on how to put together a structurally sound intelligent argument, instead of 1,2,3's and 4's.
    Last edited by Mr.Nick; 06-08-14 at 07:15 PM.

  6. #96
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:06 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,795

    re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Nick View Post
    1.)You cant even write a paragraph in a formal format, yet you want me to take your "points" seriously..

    I hope someone teaches you a grammar lesson.

    We don't number. When making points that we wish not to argue or are just questions we use:

    -
    -
    -
    -

    Instead of 1, 2 or 3.
    Translation: you have nothing to support your failed claims so now you are deflecting and trying failed insults.
    Nobody educated and honest buys it LMAO
    also you dont have to take facts seriously, dossnt matter lol

    let us know when you have somethign on topic that is accurate and factual
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  7. #97
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:06 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,795

    re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Nick View Post
    1.)Wrong the SCOTUS will have to handle this ruling based on challenge which I assume will be coming.

    2.) As far as DOMA, that could potentially be an obstacle and has been before, which I find ironic considering a lot of those who support gay marriage think/thought Clinton was the best thing since sliced bread until Obama showed his ugly face.
    1.) 100% factually false they could decide theres nothing to hear and simply decline a full case and say the lower courts did a sufficient job and theres nothing that warranted further review.

    2.) this type of nonsensical, biased, dishonest ranting is why your posts fail so often and nobody educated or honestly takes them serious. Millions of republicans and conservatives support equal rights.
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  8. #98
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Chicago
    Last Seen
    10-30-14 @ 12:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    7,908

    re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]

    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post
    Translation: you have nothing to support your failed claims so now you are deflecting and trying failed insults.
    Nobody educated and honest buys it LMAO
    also you dont have to take facts seriously, dossnt matter lol

    let us know when you have somethign on topic that is accurate and factual
    I have plenty of claims - reading your posts can just be torture tho...

  9. #99
    Liberal Fascist For Life!


    Redress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:47 PM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    93,315
    Blog Entries
    2

    re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Nick View Post
    Wrong the SCOTUS will have to handle this ruling based on challenge which I assume will be coming.
    SCOTUS is the final arbiter, not the only arbiter.

    As far as DOMA, that could potentially be an obstacle and has been before, which I find ironic considering a lot of those who support gay marriage think/thought Clinton was the best thing since sliced bread until Obama showed his ugly face.
    SCOTUS already ruled against part of DOMA.

    I think Clinton was a good president. That does not mean I think he was perfect. That should not even be remotely hard to understand, so clue why you have trouble with the concept.
    We became a great nation not because we are a nation of cynics. We became a great nation because we are a nation of believers - Lindsey Graham

    Quote Originally Posted by Fiddytree View Post
    Uh oh Megyn...your vagina witchcraft is about ready to be exposed.

  10. #100
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Chicago
    Last Seen
    10-30-14 @ 12:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    7,908

    re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]

    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post
    1.) 100% factually false they could decide theres nothing to hear and simply decline a full case and say the lower courts did a sufficient job and theres nothing that warranted further review.

    2.) this type of nonsensical, biased, dishonest ranting is why your posts fail so often and nobody educated or honestly takes them serious. Millions of republicans and conservatives support equal rights.
    What's nonsense is actually believing a Wisconsin district judge can actually decide the constitutionality of an issue. The Law that does decide these ideas is called the Supreme Court of The United States.

    If you paid attention to the legal process you would understand this or have an understanding of how our government works. This isn't the "Wild West" where law was arbitrary at best and a judge could sentence you to death and you would be hanged a few hours or a couple of days later.

    I'm not the biggest fan of how our legal system works, but at least we have an appeals process.

    I understand law and the "system" a lot better than you do.

    No doubt the SCOTUS will uphold the ruling because the SCOTUS represents tyranny, but I do understand the process.

Page 10 of 53 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •