Yes, I did. You conveniently...missed...it.
Dude. Do you not have a life away from the computer? I don't know - maybe you do, maybe you don't. I do...and I make no crude assumptions about other people.
You should learn to refrain from making assumptions about people - that's how prejudice takes hold.
Now, as to your claim that he renounced his citizenship. It took about ten minutes of scrolling through each and every page and I found it back in comment #327 (IIRC)...where it referenced
this article. You saw the parts where he apparently left a note...but did you read ALL of the article?
Apparently not, because the article also said this:
The New York Times was also told by officials that the soldier left behind a note spelling out his disenchantment and his desire to walk away to start a new life.
But there are conflicting reports as other US army officials who have read the original classified 2010 investigation report into his case said the document did not refer to a note.
Do you believe in the AMERICAN judicial tradition of "innocent until proven guilty in a court of law"? Do you? Do you really? Because you have shown that you were ABSOLUTELY SURE that he had renounced his citizenship...but now, using the SAME article you used as 'proof', we can see that there may very well be reasonable doubt.
Bergdahl obviously wasn't liked by his unit for whatever reason. Was that alleged - ALLEGED - note written by Bergdahl himself? Or was it placed there by people in his unit who were ticked off at him? We don't know. YOU don't know.
And the most pertinent paragraph of all in that entire article you referenced is this one:
“There have been several looks into the circumstances surrounding his disappearance but we’ve never publicly said anything, primarily because we haven’t had a chance to speak to Sgt Bergdahl himself,” Col Warren said.
"Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law." There's a reason for that judicial tradition, and that Army colonel just gave another example of upholding that tradition. Bergdahl might be as guilty as sin and if so, he will richly deserve what's coming to him. But - according to AMERICAN judicial tradition, he is at this moment INNOCENT and will remain INNOCENT until proven guilty in a court of law.
So...NO, you did not 'prove' that Bergdahl renounced his citizenship. All you did was go on your assumptions.