• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office:not random [W:43:128]

Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

If Media Matters hasn't covered this story, what does it say ?

Media Matters doesn't cover news stories, they cover media.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Media Matters doesn't cover news stories, they cover media.

It never ceases to amaze me how many people will relentlessly criticize Media Matters while simultaneously having no bloody idea what Media Matters actually does.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act[W

You do know that Democrats can be conservatives too, and in fact many of them are. Did you mean "Republicans are saints"?

Heya TB.
hello2.gif
Do you think the writer of the OP knew that faux outrage about Demos offices getting hit? Do you think they even thought that BS was relevant to this issue? When they report this with an election going on. Do you think that the Big Political Haystack that is quite visible? Is kind of like.....not real hard to miss? :lol:

Perspective.....huh? :mrgreen:
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Engaging in violent acts against one's self, or against those whom you support in order to then blame the other side in an effort to discredit the opposition for personal or political purposes, is a liberal/progressive tactic, not a conservative one....

My kind of vandals

(WND columnit defends vandals who defaced an atheist billboard)

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/26/us/politics/26threat.html?_r=0

(Gas line cut at home of the brother of a Dem congressman. The home had been erroneously listed as the congressman's residence)

Planned Parenthood firebombed, right wing silent - Salon.com

(Molotov cocktail thrown at Texas Planned Parenthood clinic)

Women's Health Care Clinic in Montana Destroyed by Anti-Choice Vandal | Slog

(Women's health care clinic in Montana vandalized)

Democratic offices in Wichita, elsewhere vandalized | Wichita Eagle
Nation & World | Vandals target Democrats over health-bill vote | Seattle Times Newspaper

(Democratic Party offices vandalized in Kansas, New York; Congresswoman Louise Slaughter's office and Gabriel Giffords' office vandalized, militia leader claims responsibility; other acts of vandalism reported)

But yeah, it's exclusively a "liberal" tactic. :roll:
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

If Media Matters hasn't covered this story, what does it say ?

That even they can't come up with a way to falsely imply it was conservatives,
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

That even they can't come up with a way to falsely imply it was conservatives,

Which is why you are seeing that tactic put out by the Demo Underground with their talking points about.....when Democratic offices have been hit. Telling their crew talk about that and deflect with that BS. The Basics. :lol:
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Engaging in violent acts against one's self, or against those whom you support in order to then blame the other side in an effort to discredit the opposition for personal or political purposes, is a liberal/progressive tactic, not a conservative one.... Violence, destruction of property and illegal behavior have become synonymous with the left over the last decade or so. Just compare the behavior of liberals from the Occupy Wall Street protests, with the behavior of conservatives at tax-day and tea party protests, and that says it all...

Remember this one in Denver back in 2009:
Colorado GOP Calls for Apology After Democratic Office Vandalism | Fox News

How about this from GWU:
GWU College Democrats Apologize for Vandalism

Liberal students with tourches attack Chancellor's home in Berkley
8 arrested in vandalism of UC chancellor's home - SFGate


Then there are these that you are free to Google at your leisure:


Two liberals in Mi charged after splashing human blood over recruiting posters, military cutouts and the American flag at recruiting office.

Claremont McKenna College visiting professor of psychology falsely claimed she discovered anti-Semitic, anti-black, anti-woman graffiti spray-painted on her car convicted of two felony counts of attemped insurance fraud and one misdemeanor count of filing a false police report

Liberal mob attack Army recruiter at local Community college in Seattle

Left-wing SEIU group beats black conservative …

Liberal man in Florida barges into a local GOP office, punches worker...

Left-wing group breaks into a home in Baltimore in the name of “social justice”…

Son of Dem Congresswoman, Son of former Dem Mayor and 5 Kerry campaign workers slash van tires of Repub Committee

Left-wing group punches conservative Campaign for Liberty witness with camera…

Liberal man in Howard County Md charged with malicious destruction of property for cutting down election signs

Left-wing group ANSWER attacks anti-illegal immigration protesters.

Liberal couple in Elliot City Md charged with malicious destruction of property for cutting down election signs

Left-wing group attack Ann Coulter during UofA speech...

Liberal man in Tampa charged with aggravated stalking for terrorizing a mother who had a Bush-Cheney bumper sticker on her car

Left-wing group shuts down speech at Columbia University…

Liberal man in Fla charged with attempting to run over Republican congresswoman Katherine Harris with his Cadillac.

Left-wing group shuts down speech at UNC-Chapel Hill…

Liberal student pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor battery charge for Bill Kristol attack

Left-wing group shuts down speech at UNC-Chapel Hill…

Liberal at Western Michigan University arrested and charged for Pat Buchanan attack

Left-wing group blocks military shipments in Olympia, WA…

Liberal campus secretary in NY charged with second-degree assault, disorderly conduct, and obstructing governmental administration at protest

Left-wing group chases Christian evangelists out of San Francisco’s Castro district

Liberal charged in Indianapolis with felony criminal mischief at Metal of Honor Memorial

Left-wing group stomps on elderly Prop. 8 supporter’s cross.


Believe me, there are plenty more but I have to eat dinner sometime.

What do any of those events have to do with this one which is completely apart from those?
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Then why do you always use them as a source ?
I don't always use them as a source.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Liberals hate gays, minorities and women that dare to step off the plantation.

Huh.

Conservative (social) = Everything should stay traditional, marriage should be only for straights, social ideas from the friggin colonial times should stay intact, etc.

Liberal (social) = Everything should evolve, marriage should evolve to allow Gays, etc.

Sheesh, get it right.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Can you backup your claim with a reliable source ?
What claim?
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

But yeah, it's exclusively a "liberal" tactic. :roll:

I realize both sides have their extreemists, but with the left it's definitely more frequent.

My other point that you skipped right over, which is the one directly pertaining to this thread, is that it's the left, not the right, who likes to engage in staging acts of violence and vandalism in order to blame conservatives for it. They are also known to simply make up stories out of thin air to do the same. Hell, the spitting incident and use of the "N" word on the steps of the capitol building that never actually happened are great examples, and they came from elected democrats, not some extreemist group.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Μολὼν λαβέ;1063342566 said:
You use this sentence so much it shows your obvious hyper-partisanship, and makes your opinions irrelevant.

Laughing, coming from you that does give me my first good chuckle of the day- thank you.

But oh where are you when all the CONs post their 'libtard' rants???? :roll:

CON, LIB, PRO, DEM- I use them all. That you duck out on the slightest excuse than admit the OP was a 'breitbart/OKeefe' disengenuious CON hit piece, that in the CONGRESSIONAL race the gay commuinty is attacking the GOP candidate on his positions not his choice of lovers, and the biggest turd in the punch bowl are the Fundies and extreme right wing CONs who DON'T want a gay guy representing them....so you resort to the typical CON game.... :peace
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Which in no way shape or form prove one way or another the details of this most recent event. They are irrelevant.

Yes, everyone is innocent, etc. However if we compare the history of both parties there is one which protests more quietly and peaceably and anther who is willing to lie, lie under oath, and commit a great deal of violence and property damage to make their point.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Yes, everyone is innocent, etc. However if we compare the history of both parties there is one which protests more quietly and peaceably and anther who is willing to lie, lie under oath, and commit a great deal of violence and property damage to make their point.

This is silly for anybody to think they can use instances in history to indict different people today which had nothing to do with those things.

Dems could just as easy talk about Tea Pot Dome and Watergate and Iran Contra and all the lies and damage done to the nation from those things to indict modern republicans.......... and that would be just as silly and outright stupid.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

This is silly for anybody to think they can use instances in history to indict different people today which had nothing to do with those things.

Dems could just as easy talk about Tea Pot Dome and Watergate and Iran Contra and all the lies and damage done to the nation from those things to indict modern republicans.......... and that would be just as silly and outright stupid.

Yes, Dems could talk about what you mentioned but they would have to go back a generation to a President who was told to leave by his own party for his wrongdoing. There is no Democrat equivalent.

But I am talking recent history, which this is all about. You would have no problem telling which party is which in the example I gave above, right?
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Yes, Dems could talk about what you mentioned but they would have to go back a generation to a President who was told to leave by his own party for his wrongdoing. There is no Democrat equivalent.

But I am talking recent history, which this is all about. You would have no problem telling which party is which in the example I gave above, right?

For me, Watergate and Iran Contra are recent history. Its all a matter of perspective. When I hear Republican Mike Turzai talk about manipulating a new law to decide presidential elections in favor of Republicans in his state - that reeks to high heaven and has the potential to be worse than most of the examples provided against Dems. When I see my own US Representative in the Congress - Thad McCotter (R) Michigan, serve at least his last two terms in Congress with illegal petition signatures that people pled guilty to - that is disgusting and far worse than some of the examples listed.

So its all a matter of whose ox is being gored.

I spent the last three years in my state capitol working as chief of staff for a state legislator and believe me - they are all less than saints and many far closer to ladies of night without the happy ending.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

For me, Watergate and Iran Contra are recent history. Its all a matter of perspective. When I hear Republican Mike Turzai talk about manipulating a new law to decide presidential elections in favor of Republicans in his state - that reeks to high heaven and has the potential to be worse than most of the examples provided against Dems. When I see my own US Representative in the Congress - Thad McCotter (R) Michigan, serve at least his last two terms in Congress with illegal petition signatures that people pled guilty to - that is disgusting and far worse than some of the examples listed.

So its all a matter of whose ox is being gored.

I spent the last three years in my state capitol working as chief of staff for a state legislator and believe me - they are all less than saints and many far closer to ladies of night without the happy ending.

None of these examples demonstrated rioting, the damage of public property, the violence, the setting of fires, and so on. It's not a question of which party is more politically honest but which party is more capable of the property damage demonstrated in the OP. The answer seems clear.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

None of these examples demonstrated rioting, the damage of public property, the violence, the setting of fires, and so on. It's not a question of which party is more politically honest but which party is more capable of the property damage demonstrated in the OP. The answer seems clear.

They clearly demonstrate a direct attack upon the sacredness of the vote of the people - and is that not what you object to?
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

None of these examples demonstrated rioting, the damage of public property, the violence, the setting of fires, and so on. It's not a question of which party is more politically honest but which party is more capable of the property damage demonstrated in the OP. The answer seems clear.

I see the examples of right-wing vandalism I posted were handwaved away or just ignored.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

I see the examples of right-wing vandalism I posted were handwaved away or just ignored.

I'll condemn that just as strongly as you'd condemn left wing motivated vandalism, your response being "well the right has done it too" so I guess that just makes us all even.
 
Back
Top Bottom