• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office:not random [W:43:128]

Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Kobie said:
Only ideologues attempt to use "left" and "right" as insults.
Click to expand...
Could be.
Oh, I know why you use it as a pejorative.
Click to expand...
And why is that? It is from years of experience.
Apparently there's also, quoted from the article "some conservative lawmakers in Congress" who are also for it.
Click to expand...
Some Republicans might be for it, yes..
"Vastly improved" from **** is still ****. Of course, since you are hellbent on whitewashing your "side's" role in the economy's collapse, it's little wonder that you're attacking Obama for it.
Click to expand...
There seems to be some confusion among the left whether the economy is better, worse, or much the same. But in any case the food stamp use is growing much faster than any segment of the economy.
All I asked for was a citation. You're the one who took it down Personal Attack Boulevard.
Click to expand...
With the country in $$%trillions in debt that pushing of food stamps, even among illegal immigrants, and even in Mexico, is something every voter should know about. But I suppose that's what happens when you are being poorly served by the MSM.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Grant said:
No, as per the OP I'm against vandalism and violence as a political statement.
Click to expand...

Anything which undermines the sacredness of the peoples vote is a type of vandalism and violence and that includes Mike Turzai's nefarious plan as well as Thad McCotter defrauding the voters of his district for at least two terms.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Moderator's Warning:
The topic is not food stamps or anything else that's been dragged into the discussion. It is:

Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act

Let's get back to that topic and leave out the baiting as well.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Grant said:
None of these examples demonstrated rioting, the damage of public property, the violence, the setting of fires, and so on. It's not a question of which party is more politically honest but which party is more capable of the property damage demonstrated in the OP. The answer seems clear.
Click to expand...

BREAKING: Republicans Must Denounce Tea Party Violence | Progressive Change Campaign Committee

How about this? This good enough for you?

Abortion clinic bombings? Democrats?

Vandalism reported at offices of three Democrats - CNN.com

perhaps you should maybe think of another tactic?
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Sababa said:
BREAKING: Republicans Must Denounce Tea Party Violence | Progressive Change Campaign Committee

How about this? This good enough for you?

Abortion clinic bombings? Democrats?

Vandalism reported at offices of three Democrats - CNN.com

perhaps you should maybe think of another tactic?
Click to expand...

I cited several incidents of right-perpetrated vandalism; they were ignored. Apparently, as per usual, they Don't Count.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

Sababa said:
BREAKING: Republicans Must Denounce Tea Party Violence | Progressive Change Campaign Committee

How about this? This good enough for you?

Abortion clinic bombings? Democrats?

Vandalism reported at offices of three Democrats - CNN.com

perhaps you should maybe think of another tactic?
Click to expand...

The person involved was Tim Proffit and
"The Paul for Senate campaign is extremely disappointed in, and condemns the actions of a supporter last night outside the KET debate. Whatever the perceived provocation, any level of aggression or violence is deplorable, and will not be tolerated by our campaign. The Paul campaign has disassociated itself from the volunteer who took part in this incident, and once again urges all activists -- on both sides -- to remember that their political passions should never manifest themselves in physical altercations of any kind".
Click to expand...
Everyone should equally condemn this behavior, just as Rand Paul did, and disassociate themselves from any sort of violence. That this woman was wearing a disguise and carrying a foreign object as she approached a political candidate does not speak well for her intelligence, but there is no doubt that this character overreacted and should be charged. This is being condemned by everyone who witnessed that video.

But speaking of abortion violence, the greatest mass murderer in US history was Kermit Gosnell, with few on the left condemning him. Instead they directed the argument about being for or against abortion, which would be equivalent to someone saying that wearing disguises and carrying unidentified objects are okay at political rallies. It misses the point altogether.

One loon does not a political group make but when thousands of loons are rioting, destroying private and public party and attacking the police, then there is room for criticism of that party.
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

X Factor said:
There's a certain degree of hypocrisy, though, in the intolerance sometimes shown in the treatment by some liberals of women and minorities that don't display "proper" thinking by the same folks who claim a monopoly on compassion and tolerance. And no, hypocrisy is not exclusive to either side by any means. It's why liberals (probably quite fairly) make a point of highlighting a right wing, "family values" spouting conservative caught cheating on his wife or looking for love in a bathroom stall in the men's room.
Click to expand...

So because Conservatives don't talk about "tolerance" they're exempt?
 
Re: Vandals destroy Republican candidate’s campaign office: This was ‘no random act’

rocket88 said:
So because Conservatives don't talk about "tolerance" they're exempt?
Click to expand...

That has no bearing too what the poster said.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom