• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Pelosi picks 5 democrats for panel on benghazi

Fenton said:
If the Democrats controlled the House do you think they would appoint a equal number of representatives from each party ?

Oh wait, how silly of me, if the Democrats controlled the House there would have never been a House Committee investigation into the Benghazi attack.

Fair and balanced....
Click to expand...

6+6=12

Unless you're a con, then what difference does it make. :2razz:
 
Fenton said:
.... if the Democrats controlled the House there would have never been a House Committee investigation into the Benghazi attack...
Click to expand...
`
True. There are infinitely more important and pressing issues congress needs to address.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
i guess if there is going to be a honest investigation, better to have a true bipartisan committee and not a one-sided monologue.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/22/us/politics/bucking-deputies-pelosi-picks-5-democrats-for-benghazi-panel.html?_r=0
Click to expand...
pbrauer tried to run this brain dead excuse up the flag pole last week. Because you see, unlike the so called "investigation" that was conducted by the majority democratic senate last year? That resulted in literally nothing being found and nobody being called into account much less responsible for anything? Which literally did not have access to over 38,000 pages of subpenaed documents such as the Rhodes email, becasue the White House sought to outright hide the same? Now the argument is supposed to be that a house investigation won't be "fair" because there are a few more republicans on the select committee with access to all the material the White House took a page out of the book of Watergate and hid last year, when being investigated by the party represented by the leadership at 1600 Pennsylvania avenue. No conflict of interest or partisnship existed until now, now that what looks pretty clearly like a coverup is actually being investigated. Nothing to hide here, says the White House and it's sycophant supporters. Nah. They much preferred the one sided monologue that passed for a so called "investigation" by the democrats last year. :roll:
 
This is similar to Larry Flint going after the porn industry.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom