Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 34 of 34

Thread: Pelosi picks 5 democrats for panel on benghazi

  1. #31
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Between Athens and Jerusalem
    Last Seen
    05-18-16 @ 07:06 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    33,522

    Re: Pelosi picks 5 democrats for panel on benghazi

    Quote Originally Posted by Unitedwestand13 View Post
    i made an educated guess.
    Pure speculation, about what's in other people's minds. Id keep practicing that logic.

  2. #32
    Almost respectable

    Cardinal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    35,056

    Re: Pelosi picks 5 democrats for panel on benghazi

    Quote Originally Posted by US Conservative View Post
    Pure speculation, about what's in other people's minds. Id keep practicing that logic.
    Your observation of what qualifies as speculation is selective at best.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    You honestly believe if the roles were reversed, Pelosi would allow 6 Republicans instead of 5?

  3. #33
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Last Seen
    07-21-14 @ 07:51 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    614

    Re: Pelosi picks 5 democrats for panel on benghazi

    Quote Originally Posted by Unitedwestand13 View Post
    i guess if there is going to be a honest investigation, better to have a true bipartisan committee and not a one-sided monologue.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/22/us...anel.html?_r=0
    pbrauer tried to run this brain dead excuse up the flag pole last week. Because you see, unlike the so called "investigation" that was conducted by the majority democratic senate last year? That resulted in literally nothing being found and nobody being called into account much less responsible for anything? Which literally did not have access to over 38,000 pages of subpenaed documents such as the Rhodes email, becasue the White House sought to outright hide the same? Now the argument is supposed to be that a house investigation won't be "fair" because there are a few more republicans on the select committee with access to all the material the White House took a page out of the book of Watergate and hid last year, when being investigated by the party represented by the leadership at 1600 Pennsylvania avenue. No conflict of interest or partisnship existed until now, now that what looks pretty clearly like a coverup is actually being investigated. Nothing to hide here, says the White House and it's sycophant supporters. Nah. They much preferred the one sided monologue that passed for a so called "investigation" by the democrats last year.

  4. #34
    Sage

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 02:43 PM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    7,940

    Re: Pelosi picks 5 democrats for panel on benghazi

    This is similar to Larry Flint going after the porn industry.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •