Page 4 of 41 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 408

Thread: White House Contacted Youtube DURING Benghazi Attack.[W:324]

  1. #31
    Global Moderator
    Moderator
    Helix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:24 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    37,112

    Re: White House Contacted Youtube DURING Benghazi Attack.

    Quote Originally Posted by Blue_State View Post
    Republicans tried to cover up Sandy Hook?
    no, Democrats tried to use the tragedy to push a political agenda.

  2. #32
    Guru

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    In a Blue State
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:52 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    4,733

    Re: White House Contacted Youtube DURING Benghazi Attack.

    Quote Originally Posted by Helix View Post
    no, Democrats tried to use the tragedy to push a political agenda.
    That is today's politics. Yesterday, our senators signed a letter to the head of the NFL. Clearly, our elected leaders our doing a bang up job.
    We went from sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me to safe spaces.

  3. #33
    Global Moderator
    Moderator
    Helix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:24 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    37,112

    Re: White House Contacted Youtube DURING Benghazi Attack.

    Quote Originally Posted by Blue_State View Post
    That is today's politics. Yesterday, our senators signed a letter to the head of the NFL. Clearly, our elected leaders our doing a bang up job.
    yep, our monochromatic political system has turned into a real pile of hyperpartisan ****. thanks, gerrymandering.

  4. #34
    Sage
    WCH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    The Lone Star State.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:28 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    22,203

    Re: White House Contacted Youtube DURING Benghazi Attack.

    Quote Originally Posted by Luftwaffe View Post
    Attachment 67166896

    hummmmm... yesh yesh, dis must all be democrats killing Americans!
    No terrorist did just like they ran off the British and attacked the Red Cross.
    32 “Whoever acknowledges me before others, I will also acknowledge before my Father in heaven. 33 But whoever disowns me before others, I will disown before my Father in heaven.
    Matt. 10:32-33

  5. #35
    Sage
    Fenton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:55 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    26,313

    Re: White House Contacted Youtube DURING Benghazi Attack.

    Quote Originally Posted by Helix View Post
    Ok, **** this, I can't not comment anymore.

    The right using this as a political tool is almost as disgusting as the left using Sandy Hook.

    There have been embassy attacks under pretty much every president. It sucks, but we want to intervene in every **** hole everywhere, and this will continue to happen until we correct course.

    Conservatives, you are being used and manipulated by fox news just like dip**** liberals are being fed talking points by MSNBC. Seriously, take the ****ing red pill.

    I mean, sweet ****. I know I'll spend my day swatting off pissed off conservatives because of this, but somebody had to say it.

    Go ahead and blow up my who quoted me. I might even respond, but I'm really burned out from work, and on top of that, I'm tired today. At least think about what I said before you respond with red faced partisan rage.
    Sure there were attacks on embassy's in the past, but thats not the issue.

    This issue is a administration that manufactured a false narrative about a attack that cost four Americans their lives.

    A administration those chose to lie not only to the American people, but to the families of those who lost their lives.

    Why does that not bother you ?

    Hillary Clinton was putting out a press release before the attack was even over blaming it on a video.

    The Obama administrations priority was to perpetuate the narrative of having Al Qaeda on the run.

    So a military engagement at a Embassy couldn't happen right before election.

    That cost four Americans their lives.

  6. #36
    Global Moderator
    Moderator
    Helix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:24 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    37,112

    Re: White House Contacted Youtube DURING Benghazi Attack.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenton View Post
    Sure there were attacks on embassy's in the past, but thats not the issue.

    This issue is a administration that manufactured a false narrative about a attack that cost four Americans their lives.

    A administration those chose to lie not only to the American people, but to the families of those who lost their lives.

    Why does that not bother you ?

    Hillary Clinton was putting out a press release before the attack was even over blaming it on a video.

    The Obama administrations priority was to perpetuate the narrative of having Al Qaeda on the run.

    So a military engagement at a Embassy couldn't happen right before election.

    That cost four Americans their lives.
    you guys act just like 9/11 truthers, and that's how non-fox America looks at you. you're virtually indistinguishable from them, other than you have an entire network pushing the story.

    yes, i care that people died. this is why i would pull all of our troops out of that entire region, and i would close all of the embassies there. it's a hostile part of the world, and our own house is falling apart. get them the **** out of there.

    fox did not spend two years worth of news cycles on any of these :

    January 22, 2002. Calcutta, India. Gunmen associated with Harkat-ul-Jihad al-Islami attack the U.S. Consulate. Five people are killed.
    June 14, 2002. Karachi, Pakistan. Suicide bomber connected with al-Qaida attacks the U.S. Consulate, killing 12 and injuring 51.
    October 12, 2002. Denpasar, Indonesia. U.S. diplomatic offices bombed as part of a string of “Bali Bombings.” No fatalities.
    February 28, 2003. Islamabad, Pakistan. Several gunmen fire upon the U.S. Embassy. Two people are killed.
    May 12, 2003. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Armed al-Qaida terrorists storm the diplomatic compound killing 36 people including nine Americans. The assailants committed suicide by detonating a truck bomb.
    July 30, 2004. Tashkent, Uzbekistan. A suicide bomber from the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan attacks the U.S. Embassy, killing two people.
    December 6, 2004. Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Al-Qaida terrorists storm the U.S. Consulate and occupy the perimeter wall. Nine people are killed.
    March 2, 2006. Karachi, Pakistan again. Suicide bomber attacks the U.S. Consulate killing four people, including U.S. diplomat David Foy who was directly targeted by the attackers. (I wonder if Lindsey Graham or Fox News would even recognize the name “David Foy.” This is the third Karachi terrorist attack in four years on what’s considered American soil.)
    September 12, 2006. Damascus, Syria. Four armed gunmen shouting “Allahu akbar” storm the U.S. Embassy using grenades, automatic weapons, a car bomb and a truck bomb. Four people are killed, 13 are wounded.
    January 12, 2007. Athens, Greece. Members of a Greek terrorist group called the Revolutionary Struggle fire a rocket-propelled grenade at the U.S. Embassy. No fatalities.
    March 18, 2008. Sana’a, Yemen. Members of the al-Qaida-linked Islamic Jihad of Yemen fire a mortar at the U.S. Embassy. The shot misses the embassy, but hits nearby school killing two.
    July 9, 2008. Istanbul, Turkey. Four armed terrorists attack the U.S. Consulate. Six people are killed.
    September 17, 2008. Sana’a, Yemen. Terrorists dressed as military officials attack the U.S. Embassy with an arsenal of weapons including RPGs and detonate two car bombs. Sixteen people are killed, including an American student and her husband (they had been married for three weeks when the attack occurred). This is the second attack on this embassy in seven months.

    13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News | Bob Cesca
    this is absolutely political. the right thinks they have some kind of gotcha just like the dems do every time there's a shooting. it's annoying at best and disgusting at worst.

    here's my advice : give up on this one. it isn't watergate, and you're being fed a line of bull**** by a fake news network that is designed to feed you propaganda. the rest of the country is not going to support kicking the president out of office over this any more than it will support putting Bush on trial.

    here's what you need to do : run a candidate in 2016 who isn't a bat**** loony far right moron. choose one who is better than the democrat, run him or her, and actually try to sell your ideas to the American people. as it stands, your side has gone absolutely insane during the Obama years, and EVERYTHING you've done has been a shot fired in some hyperpartisan war with him. ****, i thought the dems were bad under Bush, but this **** is absolutely insane. the only thing you guys haven't done that they did is to make some ****ty snuff film about him. you don't like the president. fine; i'm not a huge fan either. by the time Bush was out, i was so sick of him that anything else looked good. however, i didn't go online trumpeting every embassy attack that happened on his watch, because that would have been stupid. instead, i talked about his policies, what i didn't like about them, and solutions that i support. you know, like debating.

    you guys really are Benghazi truthers. you need to know that a lot of us look at you that way, and feel that this **** should be in CT. correct course, and make your platform look better than the other side. that's how you win; not this bull****.

  7. #37
    Sage
    Fenton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:55 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    26,313

    Re: White House Contacted Youtube DURING Benghazi Attack.

    Quote Originally Posted by Helix View Post
    you guys act just like 9/11 truthers, and that's how non-fox America looks at you. you're virtually indistinguishable from them, other than you have an entire network pushing the story.

    yes, i care that people died. this is why i would pull all of our troops out of that entire region, and i would close all of the embassies there. it's a hostile part of the world, and our own house is falling apart. get them the **** out of there.

    fox did not spend two years worth of news cycles on any of these :



    this is absolutely political. the right thinks they have some kind of gotcha just like the dems do every time there's a shooting. it's annoying at best and disgusting at worst.

    here's my advice : give up on this one. it isn't watergate, and you're being fed a line of bull**** by a fake news network that is designed to feed you propaganda. the rest of the country is not going to support kicking the president out of office over this any more than it will support putting Bush on trial.

    here's what you need to do : run a candidate in 2016 who isn't a bat**** loony far right moron. choose one who is better than the democrat, run him or her, and actually try to sell your ideas to the American people. as it stands, your side has gone absolutely insane during the Obama years, and EVERYTHING you've done has been a shot fired in some hyperpartisan war with him. ****, i thought the dems were bad under Bush, but this **** is absolutely insane. the only thing you guys haven't done that they did is to make some ****ty snuff film about him. you don't like the president. fine; i'm not a huge fan either. by the time Bush was out, i was so sick of him that anything else looked good. however, i didn't go online trumpeting every embassy attack that happened on his watch, because that would have been stupid. instead, i talked about his policies, what i didn't like about them, and solutions that i support. you know, like debating.

    you guys really are Benghazi truthers. you need to know that a lot of us look at you that way, and feel that this **** should be in CT. correct course, and make your platform look better than the other side. that's how you win; not this bull****.
    Your missing the point.

    Whats wrong with holding a administration accountable for perpetuating a false narrative over a attack that cost 4 Americans their lives ?

    Whats wrong with confronting a huge lie ?

    If Obama was so concerned about guarding his " Al Qaeda is on the Run " re-election narrative that he would lie to the American people AND to the Family members who lost their loved ones, what makes you think he wouldn't purposely hold back Military assistance ?

    To keep Benghazi from turning into a battle between the Terorist and American special forces.

  8. #38
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: White House Contacted Youtube DURING Benghazi Attack.

    Quote Originally Posted by US Conservative View Post
    IIRC Libya didn't even have access to Egypts youtube.

    This is just another part of this scandal that will need to be investigated.


    Mornin' USC. Even Better was the Cleric in Cairo Egypt.....never saw the video. Yet he called for the Rioting in Egypt and then used Social media to spread the word to all the Sunni.

    Which he was never brought in for inciting riots or anything. Not even for using the social media to spread the protests.

  9. #39
    Global Moderator
    Moderator
    Helix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:24 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    37,112

    Re: White House Contacted Youtube DURING Benghazi Attack.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenton View Post
    Your missing the point.

    Whats wrong with holding a administration accountable for perpetuating a false narrative over a attack that cost 4 Americans their lives ?

    Whats wrong with confronting a huge lie ?

    If Obama was so concerned about guarding his " Al Qaeda is on the Run " re-election narrative that he would lie to the American people AND to the Family members who lost their loved ones, what makes you think he wouldn't purposely hold back Military assistance ?

    To keep Benghazi from turning into a battle between the Terorist and American special forces.
    you ignored my entire post. i will distill it.

    many embassy attacks have occurred during the past few decades :

    Attacks on U.S. diplomatic facilities - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    fox has devoted two years of saturation coverage to only one of them. this is because they are using it as a political tool. your side is coming off as conspiracy theorists to those of us who don't watch fox, and it will not help you win an election. i assume it has become more about Hillary Clinton than Obama now, as fox's new mission is probably to sink her candidacy. i really don't care. however, your use of an embassy tragedy will not win you my vote. if you'd like to win my vote, push an end to interventionism and the closing of embassies in hostile regions. also, i'd like to see our infrastructure rebuilt and expanded, and we should be getting off of oil so that we would have to give many fewer ****s about that part of the world. run a candidate who supports that, and i'll consider him or her for a vote. run eight million swiftboat commercials about Benghazi, and i'm not going to come anywhere near your candidate.

    on a related note, the strategy of conspiracy theorists is to tie up their opponents in increasing intricacies to mask the fact that the theory itself is usually bull****. they can't prove that Bush shot missiles at the twin towers, so they spend eons debating about one structural point in the tower, or about WTC7. then you post a pic of WTC7 which shows the damage that led to the collapse, and they just ignore it and move on to something else. that's what you guys do with Benghazi. i usually avoid CT threads like the plague, but apparently fox must have returned to saturation coverage because there have been a ****load of threads recently. i just couldn't take it anymore. mea culpa.

  10. #40
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: White House Contacted Youtube DURING Benghazi Attack.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    Issa's got a point - he claims the WH settled on a narrative before the attack was even over... Issa's hinting that blaming the video was planned while the attack was still occurring ---- without an investigation, without more information like this WH has shown to prefer. It's curious but as a piece of information I don't have enough context to know what if anything it means.
    Heya Ockham.....he has another point too.


    "While the information I have cited from this e-mail is clearly unclassified, the State Department has attempted to obstruct its disclosure by not providing Congress with an unclassified copy of this document," Issa said.

    Another State Department document, this one labeled "sensitive but unclassified" and dated Sept. 12, also refers both to the video and to a group linked to al Qaeda in explaining the cause of the attack.

    "At least 20 armed extremists, members of Ansar al-Sharia, set fire to the Principal's office, allegedly retaliating for videos posted on the internet of a film deemed insulting to Islam," the memo reads, providing an early State Department summary of what happened.....snip~

    White House Contacted YouTube During Benghazi Attack, Darrell Issa Says

Page 4 of 41 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •