Good luck with that wish.our gerrymandered two party system just isn't working anymore, and we need to scrap it and try something else.
Watch the President take to the podium to speak on the murder of 13 people and begin ... with a shout out.
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish and he stops voting for the Free Fish party.
Anyway, your strawman (that being that I personally cared about it) is a particularly bizarre red herring. After a while you just kind of expect that if somebody bad mouths Islam somebody's going to set a flag on fire or something.
Last edited by Cardinal; 05-26-14 at 06:56 PM.
anyway, no one has linked me to any thread anywhere on line in which they demanded an investigation of an embassy attack between 2001 and 2009, so i suppose there's nothing to do here. have a good one.
And that is what is so frightening about the socialist hordes who back this guy....
They do not realize that by aiding and abetting this and every other White House concocted problem, they are placing the country in peril; each new president will look at what Obama has accomplished in deception, and consider that the new standard.
Clinton deliberately devalued the legal debate into one of tawdry suck jobs and seamen stained clothes; I for one can no longer think of the Oval Office as a place of honor and integrity, but of cheap, low life animal urges. But that, the spin of that narrow point enabled him to not get kicked out of office, an amazing accomplishment next to the likes of Theodore Roosevelt, FDR or Ronald Reagan.
But it stands, it cannot be removed this stain on the corridors of power and the way Clinton evaded the issue and escaped is now what Obama plays on every single issue; the dumbing down, over simplification reductivism that ranges from "So, you hate Obama and want people to die..." for finding fault with the ACA, to demanding enough evidence to impeach to justify an investigation at all.
It is the new reality where "it depends on what your definition of is, is" replaces integrity; even the foul, lying Harry S. Truman said "the buck stops here" which under Obama has come to mean "the buck gets passed FROM here..."
"Small people talk about people, average people talk about events, great people talk about ideas" Eleanor Roosevelt
In the case of Benghazi the early attempts to spin the attack and the possible coverup that resulted in the aftermath? Stand out in stark contrast to pretty much every attack ever mounted against a US Embassy before it. Had previous embassy attacks found the White House so obviously involved in trying to alter the facts about the attack, just prior to a election? Are you saying such a occurrence would not have had calls for investigation and cries of coverup? Particularly when at such length after the attack, previously withheld subpenaed material that includes disturbing and possibly damning information and evidence contrary to the White House spin has just been forced from the administration by court order? Because that claim or stance is absurd on its face.
Last edited by Filthy McNasty; 05-26-14 at 08:27 PM.