not our fault your statement completely fails and the best support you could post was the ruling. A ruling that mirrors in many ways most of the other rulings made by straight judges but some how THIS one is magically different. Educated and honest people simply dont buy it.
nor do i the other 60+ judges that have ruled similarly, 30+ federal.
But since his ruling matches all those other ones and EVERYONE since the fail of DOMA id say logically he ruled impartially. I see no logic to think otherwise unless im going to wonder about ALL judges. theres nothign that makes this one stand out.
2.) i never go ballistic in here its a message board lol
also regardless of what a poster is doesnt matter to me. I respect honesty and logic.
theres nothing wrong with your question its a fair one.
the point is your question can be asked about every single judge for every case
so to bring this up for this case is silly when its not brought up for every other.
"If you can't stand the way this place is, Take yourself to higher places!"
Break, By Three days grace
Hilliary Clinton/Tim Kaine 2016
Lol.....Please, provide some data to support your claims.
And my post wasn't about "eaual rights".
Its about societal evolution and how regardless of Religion, Race, Culture ot Nationality, the definition of marriage has always been consistent.
A man and a women.
Its also about how different millenia old societies, seperated by Ocean and Land evolved their own set of ethics and morals.
And even though they had no contact, they all reached a Consensus on what was most beneficial for their group.
And it was a distinct definition of Marriage between a man and a women.
Now, a minority, a small activist minority is forcing their definition of Marriage on the Majority.
Forcing them to consider and accept a bastardized definition of marriage not supported by thousands of years of societal evolution.
" If no one among us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else ? "
“When buying and selling are controlled by legislation, the first things to be bought and sold are legislators.” - P. J. O’Rourke
“Socialism is great until you run out of someone elses money” Margaret Thatcher
2.) also never said its been around large scale, since thier a minority it never will be nor does it matter lol
please try to keep up
3.) my claims are easy, the failed straw men you made up thats YOUR job not mine. Starwman wont work and will only continue in your posts failing.
4.) whether you like it not not it factually is.
5.) your opinion on this is meanignless to equal rights and legal marriage. This could have been said about womens, minority or religious rights at times too, its all meaningless
6.) your opinion on this is meanignless to equal rights and legal marriage.
7.) your opinion on this is meanignless to equal rights and legal marriage.
8.) 100% factually false the majority of americans support equal rights, secondly nothing is FORCED on anybody and lastly majority/minority . . . wait for it . . . . is meanignless to equal rights and legal marriage
9.) sorry there is no force to accept or consider what your opinion of equal rights is.
let me know when you have somethign factual and relevant to equal rights and legal marriage, please and thank you
I'm confused, Agent. You're saying gay marriage has been around for years, going back generations? Where?
theres records of gay marriage existing throughout deep history. Posters have posted links to this info many times, usually when somebody tries to sell the lie its brand new. The best part is it doesnt matter that they are factually wrong or even if they were right, neither of them mean anythign to equal rights and legal marriage
etc etc are all meanings to equal rights and legal marriage, they have no impact. All the strawmen fail over and over again