- Joined
- Jan 10, 2009
- Messages
- 42,744
- Reaction score
- 22,569
- Location
- Bonners Ferry ID USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
No, the traditional and fundamental definition of a marriage is centered around a Family unit that includes a Mother and Father and Children.
No, actually the traditional definition is centered around property and prestige and power.
Two Gay men deprive a child of a Mother,two Gay women deprive a child of a Father.
Gender is irrelevant when raising a child.
Sorry, but there is a Good reason Gay Marriage hasn't been Socially acceptable for much of Recorded human history and then some.
Actually it was quite accepted in many cultures and regions. Anti-SSM folks just refuse to acknowledge those unions as "traditional marriages".
Your Opinions are meaningless.
And yours are not? :lamo:
Oh and 30 activist Judges disagree with me. So what ?
I've noticed that whenever a judge upholds a ruling that people like they are just "doing what's right", while those judges that make decisions that they don't like then those judges are always "activist judges". :roll: Sorry Fenton but there are more judges than just those ruling on gay marriage that has stated time and again that marriage is a fundamental right. You cannot fault these judges for upholding that ruling and applying the 14th amendment to it. If you have a problem with it then you need to get rid of the 14th Amendment. GL on that.
BTW, I find it hilarious that you think that 30 people who are well versed in laws are all wrong and "activist judges" and somehow you know better than them.
You're rights aren't being denied if its currently ILLEGAL to marry someone of the same Sex.
You don't know what it means to deny a Right do you? The government denies rights by making those Rights illegal. Something which the government is not allowed to do. Which is why all these judges have been striking down anti-SSM laws all every single time that it comes up before them.
You dont like the Law ? Tough cookies.
As we are seeing over and over with those laws being struck down by the courts.... Tough cookies to you. After all, it IS the law that they can strike down unconstitutional laws.
Last edited: