Page 2 of 15 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 149

Thread: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38:145]

  1. #11
    Guru
    Joe Steel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri, USA
    Last Seen
    05-11-16 @ 07:36 PM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    3,054

    re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

    Quote Originally Posted by zimmer View Post
    "Very Liberal" indeed. Intellectual curiosity has never been a strong point of the Socialists.

    You did note there was a second post below the OP. Non? It goes into a little more detail. Golly Geez, there is a link to the story too!!! One that fills in even more of the story. How bout them apples?

    Looking forward to your deep insights about the Global Warming Faktion, their thug-like tactics, and attempts to deny science from being published.
    I noticed a link to an article at WND. It's useless.
    Proud to be a tax and spend leftist.

    Proud supporter of the real Second Amendment.

  2. #12
    Educating the Ignorant
    zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:20 PM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    14,419
    Blog Entries
    12

    re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

    Quote Originally Posted by The German View Post
    That is a US phenomenon.

    Mainly because in Germany, we dont let oil companies influence scientific data through money.

    Unlike in your country, where you legalised corruption.
    Transparency International’s Global corruption barometer 2013 reveals that political parties and businesses are the most corrupt institutions in Germany... 11% of the respondents claim to have been asked to pay a bribe at one point in their life and only few of those said that they had refused to pay the bribe
    Corruption in Germany - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    The German government is known for it's back door deals. No pun intended.


    What is "Der Globale Erwärmung Armee"???????

    Armee is a male noun in German and need a "Die".

    "Erwärmung" in this use as a noun would require a "der"

    And "Armee" would be required to seat infront of the "Armee" to make any sence whatsovever!

    "Die Armee der globalen Erwärmung"

    Now go back to raping your own language.
    Having watched a few shows of prominent Germans writing their own language and failing miserably in most instances (you know the show)... I'll take your complaint as a compliment. ROTFLOL... it seems you know what Die Armee der globalen Erwärmung is and... you seem a little pissed by it being so accurately portayed.

    Conspiracy wohohooooo
    Threatening a prominent climate scientist, having him fear for his health and safety doesn't bother you? Of course not. You seem to be illustrating that your position is more along the lines of a good'ol goose stepping member of Die Armee.


    What an idiotic appeal on the basis of emotion.

    Now explain how you conspiracy is supposedly warning me from the nazis?

    I see more similarity between the nazis and people who blow up abortion kliniks, murder homosexuals, say that black people would be better off in slavery and believe women should be chained to the kitchens.
    Hard to believe that went over your head, but it obviously did. It was a comparison of heavy handed tactics against those that threaten a certain party.

    For criminal perpatrators we have courts and prisons. And your reference to Bundy shows your ignorance. He never stated they were better off as slaves. And your bit about women is interesting. A fantasy of yours perhaps, as I don't know of any society that does it. The closest are Muslims, who deny women just about everything. Come to think of it, these climate "scientists" seem like fundamentalist Muslims. When one attacks their religion, they show no mercy.
    The Clintons are what happens...
    when you have NO MORAL COMPASS.

  3. #13
    Guru
    Joe Steel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri, USA
    Last Seen
    05-11-16 @ 07:36 PM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    3,054

    re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

    Quote Originally Posted by zimmer View Post
    "Very Liberal" indeed. Intellectual curiosity has never been a strong point of the Socialists. ...
    I was curious enough to read the article you linked. Unfortunately, that was impossible. Did you realize not everyone was a subscriber or was that part of the plan, support the comment with data which was impossible to view?
    Proud to be a tax and spend leftist.

    Proud supporter of the real Second Amendment.

  4. #14
    Educating the Ignorant
    zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:20 PM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    14,419
    Blog Entries
    12

    re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Steel View Post
    I noticed a link to an article at WND. It's useless.
    I was going to post a

    5
    4
    3
    2
    1

    because I figured from your first post that you're one of these democraticunderground drones who seems lost in a forum that actually debates.

    The reason I didn't do a count down is it has drawn penalties for baiting in the past.

    In any event, you are too predictable; a typically narrow minded Socialist.
    The Clintons are what happens...
    when you have NO MORAL COMPASS.

  5. #15
    Guru
    Joe Steel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri, USA
    Last Seen
    05-11-16 @ 07:36 PM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    3,054

    re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

    Quote Originally Posted by zimmer View Post
    I was going to post a

    5
    4
    3
    2
    1

    because I figured from your first post that you're one of these democraticunderground drones who seems lost in a forum that actually debates.

    The reason I didn't do a count down is it has drawn penalties for baiting in the past.

    In any event, you are too predictable; a typically narrow minded Socialist.
    1. What's the purpose of a countdown?

    2. Do you consider yourself a capable debater?
    Proud to be a tax and spend leftist.

    Proud supporter of the real Second Amendment.

  6. #16
    Sage
    longview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:02 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    14,323

    re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

    Quote Originally Posted by The German View Post
    Evidence is available in abundance.

    You are speaking to an aspiring scientist in the field of statistical maths, who comes from a family of scientists!!!!!

    Someone like me is in no need of lecture on science by some swamp people!
    Evidence of what?
    When you peel back the layers of the predictions by the IPCC, what do they really predict?
    The basic thing is that when CO2 levels double from 280 ppm to 560 ppm,
    we should see an equilibrium climate response of between 1.5 and 4.5 C.
    To get to this large range, they blended accepted Physics, (CO2s direct response) with
    an unquantified concept called Forcing, which is really open loop feedbacks.
    Considering that the observed temperature increase for the last 133 years,
    is .8 C, and the direct response of CO2 is 51% complete, some of the supposed
    forcing should be readily apparent.
    Of the .8 C observed, .6 C is attributable to the direct response of CO2 1.2 C.
    This leaves only .2 C, in the last 133 years, for all unknown inputs, both natural and anthropogenic.
    I made a quick graph showing the limits, low, mid and High, of the predictions,
    along with the observed data. not a lot of room for panic.
    2080_doubling.jpg
    P.S. I am Proud of my cajun heritage.

  7. #17
    Educating the Ignorant
    zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:20 PM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    14,419
    Blog Entries
    12

    re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Steel View Post
    1. What's the purpose of a countdown?
    Expecting your WND remark after your OP. Your OP made that call a no-brainer.
    The Clintons are what happens...
    when you have NO MORAL COMPASS.

  8. #18
    Educating the Ignorant
    zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:20 PM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    14,419
    Blog Entries
    12

    re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

    Quote Originally Posted by longview View Post
    Evidence of what?
    When you peel back the layers of the predictions by the IPCC, what do they really predict?
    The basic thing is that when CO2 levels double from 280 ppm to 560 ppm,
    we should see an equilibrium climate response of between 1.5 and 4.5 C.
    To get to this large range, they blended accepted Physics, (CO2s direct response) with
    an unquantified concept called Forcing, which is really open loop feedbacks.
    Considering that the observed temperature increase for the last 133 years,
    is .8 C, and the direct response of CO2 is 51% complete, some of the supposed
    forcing should be readily apparent.
    Of the .8 C observed, .6 C is attributable to the direct response of CO2 1.2 C.
    This leaves only .2 C, in the last 133 years, for all unknown inputs, both natural and anthropogenic.
    I made a quick graph showing the limits, low, mid and High, of the predictions,
    along with the observed data. not a lot of room for panic.
    2080_doubling.jpg
    P.S. I am Proud of my cajun heritage.
    I am more than familiar with Germany, and the mindset there. You cannot escape references to Klima Erwarmung... they insert it everywhere.

    I recall a slow moving system in southern Germany/Austria, and the day before the storm the weather babe explained it so. Well, the storm dumped a mass of water and the autobahn between Innsbruck and Munich was shut down (Austrian side). Of course there were problems all over the south. Then came the flash flood of those blaming global warming. It was a slow moving weather event... but... Zee Propagandists couldn't pass up a chance to propagandize.

    I can cut off a few fingers and my thumb and count the number of times you see someone, anyone voice opposition to Klima Erwarmung in public. Wonder why? There is a price to pay if you stray... as the scientist proved.
    The Clintons are what happens...
    when you have NO MORAL COMPASS.

  9. #19
    Guru
    Joe Steel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri, USA
    Last Seen
    05-11-16 @ 07:36 PM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    3,054

    re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

    Quote Originally Posted by zimmer View Post
    Expecting your WND remark after your OP. Your OP made that call a no-brainer.
    Do you think WND is a credible source?
    Proud to be a tax and spend leftist.

    Proud supporter of the real Second Amendment.

  10. #20
    Educating the Ignorant
    zimmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:20 PM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    14,419
    Blog Entries
    12

    re: Scientists in cover-up of ‘damaging’ climate view[W:38]

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Steel View Post
    Do you think WND is a credible source?
    Let me give you a tip. Open your mind and read things and sources you disagree with.

    You see, I was once a "Very Liberal" Lib, but one with an open mind. My goal was to discover what was the best for society over the long haul. After years, I learned the Left relied on deception. They cannot be honest about who they are, where they want to go, or the results of their idiotic policies. Though I disagree with the Left, and their leadership is largely disgusting, I still read and listen to their stuff. I was a listener of Air Amerika... one of the 7 listeners in their audience.

    Give it a try for a few years. Listen to Limbaugh and Levin, read sources that you find unpalatable at the moment. After a few years you'll be a more rounded individual... and... You might surprise yourself.
    The Clintons are what happens...
    when you have NO MORAL COMPASS.

Page 2 of 15 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •