Page 10 of 29 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 287

Thread: Judicial Watch: New Documents Show IRS HQ Control of Tea Party Targeting

  1. #91
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Judicial Watch: New Documents Show IRS HQ Control of Tea Party Targeting

    Quote Originally Posted by ludin View Post
    it doesn't matter what you post he will still deny it.
    That's why.....I always remind about perception.



  2. #92
    Sage
    pbrauer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    11-27-15 @ 03:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    25,394

    Re: Judicial Watch: New Documents Show IRS HQ Control of Tea Party Targeting

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    That's why.....I always remind about perception.


    The following USA Today article from June 11, 2013 shows President Obama was correct when he told Bill O'Reilly on Super Bowl Sunday that there was not a "smidgen" of corruption. READ IT!

    Transcripts show IRS agents in Cincinnati -- not Washington -- flagged Tea Party cases

    ...The Tea Party affair started with a Feb. 25, 2010 e-mail (see below) from Cincinnati-based IRS agent Jack Koester to his boss, Screening Group Manager John Shafer. Shafer, in turn, sent it to his superiors, including some Washington staff, elevating it as a "high profile case."

    The Cincinnati employees weren't quite sure what the Tea Party was, but they knew it was politically sensitive. "This case will be sent to inventory for further development. Political campaigns on behalf (of) or in opposition to any political candidate do not promote social welfare," Shafer wrote to his bosses. The Tea Party groups were seeking tax exempt status as "social welfare" groups.

    A few days later, Shafer came back to Muthert asking him to look up how many Tea Party cases had been received, and how many had already been approved. "He told me that Washington, D.C wanted some cases," Muthert said, according tot he transcripts.

    Shafer, though, told congressional investigators that he asked for the list on his own -- not on orders from Washington. "No one said to make a search," he said.

    "Based on what I saw at the time, this organization is something — I don't know what it is, but it is something that appears to be growing, some type of movement," Muthert said. "So when I was asked to research the Tea Parties, it was like OK, I understand why you would want me to look at these cases and see if there is going to be a million coming in or not."...



  3. #93
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Judicial Watch: New Documents Show IRS HQ Control of Tea Party Targeting

    Here ya go PB......seems the Democrats.....and Obama have a very real and live issue to deal with. As now with this and Benghazi.....for the Republicans. Its no lose situation.


    The politics of the IRS scandal.....


    Yet, it seemed immediately apparent to me that the IRS story overwhelms the other two in terms of the potential danger posed to the administration. Why? Because any American can easily understand the unfairness and fearsomeness of using the taxing power for partisan political purposes.

    But my confidence in these sorts of political assessments isn’t sky high these days. Thus, I was happy to read that Nate Silver also sees political resonance in the IRS scandal. He assesses the likely political fall-out from a scandal by asking the following five sensible questions:

    The long-and-short of Silver’s analysis of these questions is that “the I.R.S. story scores relatively high, meaning it could have a substantial political impact.”

    As to the first question, “simplicity seems to be on the Republicans’ side in the I.R.S. case in a way it hasn’t been on Benghazi.” As to the second, “the I.R.S. story has the potential to affect perceptions of the executive branch, the Democratic Party and the United States government as a whole, and Mr. Obama.” Similarly, as to the third, “when it comes to the grievances of Tea Party voters in particular, the I.R.S.’s actions could hardly be more substantively or symbolically resonant.”

    Fourth, Republicans face little risk of a backlash when they press the administration on the IRS’s conduct. It will be difficult to portray concern about IRS abuses as a partisan squabble. President Obama and other Democrats sense this, as is clear from their initial public reaction.

    Finally, does the IRS scandal arise in a slow news cycle? I would say no, given Benghazihate. But Silver argues that this puts Republicans in something of a no-lose position:.....snip~

    The politics of the IRS scandal | Power Line


    One thing is a fact.....even Democrats know they can't get the country to turn on the Repubs over any issue with the IRS. No matter what spin game they bring.

  4. #94
    Sage
    pbrauer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    11-27-15 @ 03:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    25,394

    Re: Judicial Watch: New Documents Show IRS HQ Control of Tea Party Targeting

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Here ya go PB......seems the Democrats.....and Obama have a very real and live issue to deal with. As now with this and Benghazi.....for the Republicans. Its no lose situation.


    The politics of the IRS scandal.....


    Yet, it seemed immediately apparent to me that the IRS story overwhelms the other two in terms of the potential danger posed to the administration. Why? Because any American can easily understand the unfairness and fearsomeness of using the taxing power for partisan political purposes.

    But my confidence in these sorts of political assessments isn’t sky high these days. Thus, I was happy to read that Nate Silver also sees political resonance in the IRS scandal. He assesses the likely political fall-out from a scandal by asking the following five sensible questions:

    The long-and-short of Silver’s analysis of these questions is that “the I.R.S. story scores relatively high, meaning it could have a substantial political impact.”

    As to the first question, “simplicity seems to be on the Republicans’ side in the I.R.S. case in a way it hasn’t been on Benghazi.” As to the second, “the I.R.S. story has the potential to affect perceptions of the executive branch, the Democratic Party and the United States government as a whole, and Mr. Obama.” Similarly, as to the third, “when it comes to the grievances of Tea Party voters in particular, the I.R.S.’s actions could hardly be more substantively or symbolically resonant.”

    Fourth, Republicans face little risk of a backlash when they press the administration on the IRS’s conduct. It will be difficult to portray concern about IRS abuses as a partisan squabble. President Obama and other Democrats sense this, as is clear from their initial public reaction.

    Finally, does the IRS scandal arise in a slow news cycle? I would say no, given Benghazihate. But Silver argues that this puts Republicans in something of a no-lose position:.....snip~

    The politics of the IRS scandal | Power Line


    One thing is a fact.....even Democrats know they can't get the country to turn on the Repubs over any issue with the IRS. No matter what spin game they bring.
    I see you don't want to deal with the facts I presented in my post.


  5. #95
    Sage
    Born Free's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Sonny and Nice
    Last Seen
    12-10-17 @ 01:53 PM
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    6,396

    Re: Judicial Watch: New Documents Show IRS HQ Control of Tea Party Targeting

    Quote Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
    I see you don't want to deal with the facts I presented in my post.
    The FACTS have yet to come out, but thankfully the special committee will get to the truth and the facts.
    Liberals - Punish the Successful, Reward the Unsuccessful
    Liberals - Tax, Borrow, Spend, and Give Free Stuff
    Obama's legacy - President Donald Trump

  6. #96
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Judicial Watch: New Documents Show IRS HQ Control of Tea Party Targeting

    Quote Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
    I see you don't want to deal with the facts I presented in my post.


    I see you don't want to look at what the Political Ramifications are.....now as we speak, huh? Well what do you have to say now about the Testimony from the IRS Attorney Cleta Mitchell?



    White House spin on IRS scandal collapsing quickly.....
    May 16, 2014 <<<<< !


    The administration has claimed from the beginning that any special attention give Tea Party groups and other conservative organizations came strictly at the direction of people in the Cincinnati office, and was in no way directed by anyone in Washington.

    That was always hard to believe, but now we’re seeing clearer evidence that it was a lie. The latest testimony comes from IRS attorney Cleta Mitchell, who says very clearly that she talked to people in Cincinnati and they weren’t running the show.

    I never heard from Cincinnati,” Mitchell said. “We only dealt with Washington.”

    And these folks in Washington, whose bidding were they doing? Democrat Sen. Carl Levin for one.



    The Daily Caller reports that Levin wrote a March 30, 2012 letter to Douglas Schulman discussing the urgency of the potential of possible political activity by nonprofit entity.....snip~

    White House spin on IRS scandal collapsing quickly



    ......Looks like they forgot about Levins Letter.

  7. #97
    Sage
    pbrauer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    11-27-15 @ 03:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    25,394

    Re: Judicial Watch: New Documents Show IRS HQ Control of Tea Party Targeting

    Quote Originally Posted by Born Free View Post
    The FACTS have yet to come out, but thankfully the special committee will get to the truth and the facts.
    The information in post #92 were facts derived from Darrell Issa's House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.


  8. #98
    Sage
    pbrauer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    11-27-15 @ 03:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    25,394

    Re: Judicial Watch: New Documents Show IRS HQ Control of Tea Party Targeting

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    I see you don't want to look at what the Political Ramifications are.....now as we speak, huh? Well what do you have to say now about the Testimony from the IRS Attorney Cleta Mitchell?



    White House spin on IRS scandal collapsing quickly.....
    May 16, 2014 <<<<< !


    The administration has claimed from the beginning that any special attention give Tea Party groups and other conservative organizations came strictly at the direction of people in the Cincinnati office, and was in no way directed by anyone in Washington.

    That was always hard to believe, but now we’re seeing clearer evidence that it was a lie. The latest testimony comes from IRS attorney Cleta Mitchell, who says very clearly that she talked to people in Cincinnati and they weren’t running the show.

    I never heard from Cincinnati,” Mitchell said. “We only dealt with Washington.”

    And these folks in Washington, whose bidding were they doing? Democrat Sen. Carl Levin for one.



    The Daily Caller reports that Levin wrote a March 30, 2012 letter to Douglas Schulman discussing the urgency of the potential of possible political activity by nonprofit entity.....snip~

    White House spin on IRS scandal collapsing quickly



    ......Looks like they forgot about Levins Letter.
    Again, you are not dealing with the facts I presented in post #92. And your posting from one the most dishonest sites on the internet .. The Canada Free Press. And written by the dishonest pizza man Herman Cain. A quick Google search shows Cleta Mitchell is not an IRS attorney, so it doesn't matter what she said. Also the Levin Letter was written over two years since the targeting started.


  9. #99
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Judicial Watch: New Documents Show IRS HQ Control of Tea Party Targeting

    Quote Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
    Again, you are not dealing with the facts I presented in post #92. And your posting from one the most dishonest sites on the internet .. The Canada Free Press. And written by the dishonest pizza man Herman Cain. A quick Google search shows Cleta Mitchell is not an IRS attorney, so it doesn't matter what she said. Also the Levin Letter was written over two years since the targeting started.


    PB.....did you want to talk news sources. I can throw up Politico.....Politi-Fact. Fact Check.Org. You don't think Media Matters or Think Progress. Mother Jones, or Daily Kos, can actually Compare to a real News Organization Like the Chicago Tribune; who happens to own the L.A. Times , Chicago Suntimes and Post Tribune, did you?........or did you want to go with the false Narrative, that they don't have Levin's Letter.

    What Facts PB.....Mitchell says she never dealt with Cinci.....and that's not a Coincidincy neither, you do know her Partner Foley Correct?


    Oh and were you having trouble finding Cleta Mitchell.....here let me help you out with that.


    Cleta Mitchell.....



    Cleta Mitchell is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Foley & Lardner LLP and a member of the firm’s Political Law Practice. With more than 40 years of experience in law, politics and public policy, Ms. Mitchell advises nonprofit and issue organizations, corporations, candidates, campaigns, and individuals on state and federal campaign finance law, election law, and compliance issues related to lobbying, ethics and financial disclosure. Ms. Mitchell practices before the Federal Election Commission, the ethics committees of the US House and Senate and similar state and local enforcement bodies and agencies.

    Ms. Mitchell has extensive experience on the federal lobbying and ethics law enacted by Congress in 2007, having taught dozens of seminars on the subject since its passage. In 2008, Ms. Mitchell authored The Lobbying Compliance Handbook, published by Columbia Books, Inc.

    Ms. Mitchell represents numerous candidates, campaigns and members of Congress, as well as state and national political party committees. She has served as legal counsel to the National Republican Senatorial Committee and the National Republican Congressional Committee. Ms. Mitchell served as co-counsel for the National Rifle Association in the Supreme Court case involving the 2002 federal campaign finance law.

    Ms. Mitchell has testified before Congress on numerous occasions related to election law, campaign finance and lobbying and ethics laws, and is a frequent speaker and guest commentator on political law. In 1999, she authored "The Rise of America’s Two National Pastimes: Baseball and the Law," published by the University of Michigan Law Review, and in 2012, Ms. Mitchell authored “Donor Disclosure: Undermining The First Amendment,” published by the Minnesota Law Review. In 2013, she was interviewed by The Wall Street Journal, “How to Investigate the IRS.”.....snip~


    You were saying something about her and her credentials.....now. Oh yeah.....that she wasn't an IRS attorney. But then that was mostly false.
    Last edited by MMC; 05-18-14 at 02:11 PM.

  10. #100
    Sage
    pbrauer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    11-27-15 @ 03:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    25,394

    Re: Judicial Watch: New Documents Show IRS HQ Control of Tea Party Targeting

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    PB.....did you want to talk news sources. I can throw up Politico.....Politi-Fact. Fact Check.Org. You don't think Media Matters or Think Progress. Mother Jones, or Daily Kos, can actually Compare to a real News Organization Like the Chicago Tribune; who happens to own the L.A. Times , Chicago Suntimes and Post Tribune, did you?........or did you want to go with the false Narrative, that they don't have Levin's Letter.

    What Facts PB.....Mitchell says she never dealt with Cinci.....and that's not a Coincidincy neither, you do know her Partner Foley Correct?


    Oh and were you having trouble finding Cleta Mitchell.....here let me help you out with that.


    Cleta Mitchell.....



    Cleta Mitchell is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Foley & Lardner LLP and a member of the firm’s Political Law Practice. With more than 40 years of experience in law, politics and public policy, Ms. Mitchell advises nonprofit and issue organizations, corporations, candidates, campaigns, and individuals on state and federal campaign finance law, election law, and compliance issues related to lobbying, ethics and financial disclosure. Ms. Mitchell practices before the Federal Election Commission, the ethics committees of the US House and Senate and similar state and local enforcement bodies and agencies.

    Ms. Mitchell has extensive experience on the federal lobbying and ethics law enacted by Congress in 2007, having taught dozens of seminars on the subject since its passage. In 2008, Ms. Mitchell authored The Lobbying Compliance Handbook, published by Columbia Books, Inc.

    Ms. Mitchell represents numerous candidates, campaigns and members of Congress, as well as state and national political party committees. She has served as legal counsel to the National Republican Senatorial Committee and the National Republican Congressional Committee. Ms. Mitchell served as co-counsel for the National Rifle Association in the Supreme Court case involving the 2002 federal campaign finance law.

    Ms. Mitchell has testified before Congress on numerous occasions related to election law, campaign finance and lobbying and ethics laws, and is a frequent speaker and guest commentator on political law. In 1999, she authored "The Rise of America’s Two National Pastimes: Baseball and the Law," published by the University of Michigan Law Review, and in 2012, Ms. Mitchell authored “Donor Disclosure: Undermining The First Amendment,” published by the Minnesota Law Review. In 2013, she was interviewed by The Wall Street Journal, “How to Investigate the IRS.”.....snip~


    You were saying something about her and her credentials.....now. Oh yeah.....that she wasn't an IRS attorney. But then that was mostly false.
    She isn't employed by the IRS, that's the point. forgetaboutityournotinterestedinfactsonlybs.


Page 10 of 29 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •