• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Report: Govt. agents protected Director's Aide....

MMC

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
56,981
Reaction score
27,029
Location
Chicago Illinois
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Private
Members of a Secret Service special unit responsible for patrolling near the White House were pulled off that assignment over at least two months in 2011 to protect the assistant of the agency's director while she was engaged in a dispute with a neighbor, according to a report in The Washington Post.

The agents were pulled from a surveillance team that patrols the outskirts of the White House compound and monitors the southern side of the executive mansion whenever crowds gather to watch the president and first family travel via motorcade or helicopter, the Post reported.

Agents inside the Washington field office were concerned that the diversion of agents increased security risks to the compound and the president, two people familiar with the discussion told the newspaper. A spokesman for the agency told the Post that the agents involved were not part of the president's protective detail and therefore the operation had no impact on it.

Called "Operation Moonlight" within the agency, the assignment that summer of 2011 called for two agents twice a day, in the morning and at night, to monitor the home of his assistant, the Post reported. The residence was in rural area outside the southern Maryland town of La Plata, nearly an hour's drive from Washington.

Two agents put on Operation Moonlight thought the reassignment was a potentially illegal use of government resources and were concerned enough about their own liability that they kept records of their involvement and their superiors' instructions, the Post reported. Some informed the inspector general for the Homeland Security Department about the operation, the newspaper said.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said the White House was not aware of the allegations involving the president's protection and referred questions to the Secret Service, according to the Post.....snip~

Report: Govt. agents protected director's aide


According to Secret Service they knew and its SOP if they think there is a threat to an employee. Are they downplaying this? Is it Right to use government resources when involved in personal disputes? Why wouldn't they give the names?

Think about if your neighbor worked for the FED. Started some issue with you and you are able to aptly handle it.....then they cry wolf and threat. Now a Security team shows up. Do a little intimidating and maybe give one a message. What would you do? Or how would you handle it. Especially if the FED employee is the instigator? What say ye?
 
Members of a Secret Service special unit responsible for patrolling near the White House were pulled off that assignment over at least two months in 2011 to protect the assistant of the agency's director while she was engaged in a dispute with a neighbor, according to a report in The Washington Post.

The agents were pulled from a surveillance team that patrols the outskirts of the White House compound and monitors the southern side of the executive mansion whenever crowds gather to watch the president and first family travel via motorcade or helicopter, the Post reported.

Agents inside the Washington field office were concerned that the diversion of agents increased security risks to the compound and the president, two people familiar with the discussion told the newspaper. A spokesman for the agency told the Post that the agents involved were not part of the president's protective detail and therefore the operation had no impact on it.

Called "Operation Moonlight" within the agency, the assignment that summer of 2011 called for two agents twice a day, in the morning and at night, to monitor the home of his assistant, the Post reported. The residence was in rural area outside the southern Maryland town of La Plata, nearly an hour's drive from Washington.

Two agents put on Operation Moonlight thought the reassignment was a potentially illegal use of government resources and were concerned enough about their own liability that they kept records of their involvement and their superiors' instructions, the Post reported. Some informed the inspector general for the Homeland Security Department about the operation, the newspaper said.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said the White House was not aware of the allegations involving the president's protection and referred questions to the Secret Service, according to the Post.....snip~

Report: Govt. agents protected director's aide


According to Secret Service they knew and its SOP if they think there is a threat to an employee. Are they downplaying this? Is it Right to use government resources when involved in personal disputes? Why wouldn't they give the names?

Think about if your neighbor worked for the FED. Started some issue with you and you are able to aptly handle it.....then they cry wolf and threat. Now a Security team shows up. Do a little intimidating and maybe give one a message. What would you do? Or how would you handle it. Especially if the FED employee is the instigator? What say ye?

Doesn't sound good. Feds had no business interfering. Heads should roll.
 
Doesn't sound good. Feds had no business interfering. Heads should roll.

Mornin' DF. :2wave: Operation Moonlight.....but they say it didn't go on to long. I was wondering why the Post was looking into it, myself.
 
This is just another tiny example of how this regime acts with contempt towards citizens and those outside the beltway who only matter if they are taking an entitlement and voting properly with the fascist. Think about the precedent set. Want to protest the fascist and his / her security detail you pay for will show up and put down the uprising. Each day there seems to be more and more abuse, lies and inept failures by this regime.


Mornin' DF. :2wave: Operation Moonlight.....but they say it didn't go on to long. I was wondering why the Post was looking into it, myself.
 
This is just another tiny example of how this regime acts with contempt towards citizens and those outside the beltway who only matter if they are taking an entitlement and voting properly with the fascist. Think about the precedent set. Want to protest the fascist and his / her security detail you pay for will show up and put down the uprising. Each day there seems to be more and more abuse, lies and inept failures by this regime.

Is that from Rush, Hannity or Savage?
 
I don't listen to them so you tell me? What's the point? Why dont you defend your beloved regime if it's so great?

I was trying to remember which radio/Fox blowhard used the term 'regime' for our government. Maybe a couple of them do. Such sophomoric demonization. People should go live under an actual regime, to get some perspective.
 
I was trying to remember which radio/Fox blowhard used the term 'regime' for our government. Maybe a couple of them do. Such sophomoric demonization. People should go live under an actual regime, to get some perspective.

Oh, and do you actually think those from the Left could actually handle living under one? Cmon.....think about the Touchy feely that just would have a major meltdown. Especially those of the LGBT community. It would damn near be a death sentence for them.

They can barely handle things here.....let alone trying to deal with those that don't give a **** about how they think feel or Cry and Whine.
 
By all means feel free to move. I suppose you are still free to as long as you pay the regime. Why does the word bother you so much? In love with it? Dependent on it? Which one? It has all the makings of a regime, and to say it's not one is partisan hackery.


I was trying to remember which radio/Fox blowhard used the term 'regime' for our government. Maybe a couple of them do. Such sophomoric demonization. People should go live under an actual regime, to get some perspective.
 
Back
Top Bottom