• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rams select Michael Sam, NFL's first openly gay player [W:282]

Well, next time you're down and out try finding a BITTER ATHEIST'S HOMELESS SHELTER. (and ignore the Christian ones all over America)


There are plenty of good walk the walk Christians. The point of the quote was simple. People who call themselves Christians like you that are so quick to judge and condemn others are precisely the ones that quote was written for...

What would Christ do?
 
You're badly mistaken.

Leviticus 18:22 - "Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable."

Leviticus 20:13 - "If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads."

Romans 1:26-27 - "Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion."

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 - "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God."

1 Timothy 1:8-10 - “But we know that the law is good if one uses it lawfully, knowing this: that the law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless and insubordinate, for the ungodly and for sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, for fornicators, for sodomites, for kidnappers, for liars, for perjurers, and if there is any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine…”

Jude 7 – “In a similar way, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire.”

There's no gay marriages in the Old Testament; No gay marriages in the New Testament; no gay sex approved anywhere in the Bible. Just the opposite - gay sex is condemned in both testaments. God is consistent on that.

And to close:

“Whosoever shall be guilty of Rape, Polygamy, or Sodomy with man or woman shall be punished, if a man, by castration, if a woman, by cutting thro' the cartilage of her nose a hole of one half inch diameter at the least.” - Thomas Jefferson


That assumes that you take that piece of junk book seriously. Morality is relative, not universal.

For a book that touts itself as being righteous it sure does like talking about sodomy a lot.
 
You're badly mistaken.

We can do this all day...

Spare me the nonsense from your book of fictional fairy tales.Even the founding fathers were smart enough to leave God out of the constitution.
 
You never answered my previous question from Post #125:

Are you trying to defend sodomy as not being sinful?

Answer the question?

i already said not everyone thinks it is a sin......why can't you understand that.
 
That's been pretty much the justification for every major atrocity that has occurred in human history

With the exceptions of the ones that believe morality is universal and if you don't accept that then you deserve "judgement".
 
That's been pretty much the justification for every major atrocity that has occurred in human history

Wouldn't it be a wonderful world if people only ****ed in the missionary position with the opposite sex and only for procreation?
 
Sodomy is legal in all 50 states. He needs to get over it.

Yes that is the legal=moral attitude that has destroyed the ability to think freely for a lot of people
 
Yes that is the legal=moral attitude that has destroyed the ability to think freely for a lot of people

LOL. Shall we outlaw fellatio and cunnilingus too?

Seriously. You should try it...
 
Wouldn't it be a wonderful world if people only ****ed in the missionary position with the opposite sex and only for procreation?

Wouldn't it be such a wonderful world and were we all atheist who were morally relative and don't even have the moral fortitude to condemn Hitler.

Richard Dawkins said:
What’s to prevent us from saying Hitler wasn’t right? I mean, that is a genuinely difficult question.

Richard Dawkins: The Atheist Evangelist | byFaith
 
LOL. Shall we outlaw fellatio and cunnilingus too?

Seriously. You should try it...

I think the point went right over your head. Something can be immoral and legal at the same time
 
Wouldn't it be such a wonderful world and were we all atheist who were morally relative and don't even have the moral fortitude to condemn Hitler.



Richard Dawkins: The Atheist Evangelist | byFaith

See this is the perfect example of the religious right's brainwashing of their flock and their believing their own bull****.

Show me anyone here that you would call an atheist that would not condemn Hitler? Good luck with that.
 
With the exceptions of the ones that believe morality is universal and if you don't accept that then you deserve "judgement".

That was moral relativity also, the respective religions had nothing in their writings condoning such behavior and they used the widespread acceptance of the practices to justify them
 
I think the point went right over your head. Something can be immoral and legal at the same time

No. The point did no escape me. I simply made it clear what kind of world religious nut jobs want for the rest of us.

No thanks.
 
See this is the perfect example of the religious right's brainwashing of their flock and their believing their own bull****.

Show me anyone here that you would call an atheist that would not condemn Hitler? Good luck with that.

So Richard Dawkins doesn't count as a legitimate atheist opinion?
 
No. The point did no escape me. I simply made it clear what kind of world religious nut jobs want for the rest of us.

No thanks.

No you created a strawman to attack because you are willfully ignorant of Christianity
 
Way to celebrate sin, Agent J. Just because somebody trashes the scriptures and engages in carnal sodomy in violation of God's law isn't a legitimate reason to make a public spectacle over it.

I wish him well as a football player but would strongly advise him to repent of his sin(s).

And I strongly advise you to mind your own business. I would enjoy you saying that to his face.
 
No you created a strawman to attack because you are willfully ignorant of Christianity

No. I just don't ****ing care about your interpretation of what is and isn't moral. We have laws thank God. You and your book of fairy tales mean nothing to me.
 
So Richard Dawkins doesn't count as a legitimate atheist opinion?

And Richard Dawkins does not speak for all atheists. Richard Dawkins speaks for Richard Dawkins. Don't try to play the guilt by association game.
 
And Richard Dawkins does not speak for all atheists. Richard Dawkins speaks for Richard Dawkins. Don't try to play the guilt by association game.

It is pretty lame.
 
No. I just don't ****ing care about your interpretation of what is and isn't moral. We have laws thank God. You and your book of fairy tales mean nothing to me.

:rofl:
 
Back
Top Bottom