• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Arkansas judge strikes down gay marriage ban

You mean like the homosexual community that wants equal "rights" to receive the benefits of "marriage" but would deny equal rights to others?

What the hell is this referring to? What right do homosexuals want to deny everyone else?
 
What the hell is this referring to? What right do homosexuals want to deny everyone else?

more specifically an EQUAL right per the post and all of the gays and no straights ;)
 
"equal protection" is meant to encompass various rights, including marriage (and lawrence v texas and DOMA case cited 14th as well)

That's like saying we have no right to cross state borders or spend our money freely or go for a walk cause it doesn't say so explicitly in the constitution. There goes thousands of rights we take for granted then

None are rights.
 
are you saying that the whole homosexual community(just them no straights want it for them) wants equal rights and the homosexual community wants to deny "equal rights" to others?

if this is what you are saying please, PLEASE tell us this fantasy you are talking about then back it up with facts, we cant wait to read it lol

They generally, a large majority of them anyways, support liberal agendas. Affirmative Action, Progressive Taxes, maintaining current tax structures and benefits programs that promote inequality and don't treat all people equally.

That community seems very keen on making themselves the beneficiary of those policy but doesn't show any interest in true equality. Or are you telling me that Liberals or even Dems support a flat tax? Benefits packages that apply equally to single or married, rich or poor, on a racial basis?

In fact if they supported and worked for true equality, then marriage status wouldn't even matter. Nope, they are on the "I get the best deal and screw all others" gravy train.
 
None are rights.

Well at least your position is consistent, but that is quite a totalitarian country that would arrest its citizens for walking down the street or spending their income on a movie ticket. I sure would GTFO. That doesn't sound very capitalistic either.

Then again arresting a city clerk for giving a marriage license simply cause the couple were same sex sounds just as arbitrary and totalitarian to me.
 
They generally, a large majority of them anyways, support liberal agendas. Affirmative Action, Progressive Taxes, maintaining current tax structures and benefits programs that promote inequality and don't treat all people equally.

That community seems very keen on making themselves the beneficiary of those policy but doesn't show any interest in true equality. Or are you telling me that Liberals or even Dems support a flat tax? Benefits packages that apply equally to single or married, rich or poor, on a racial basis?

In fact if they supported and worked for true equality, then marriage status wouldn't even matter. Nope, they are on the "I get the best deal and screw all others" gravy train.

It sounds more like you never met a gay person. All you're doing is generalizing. There are gay christians, repubs, you name it. All being gay does is make someone attracted to same sex.
 
1.)They generally, a large majority of them anyways, support liberal agendas.
2.) Affirmative Action, Progressive Taxes, maintaining current tax structures and benefits programs that promote inequality and don't treat all people equally.
3.)That community seems very keen on making themselves the beneficiary of those policy but doesn't show any interest in true equality.
4.) Or are you telling me that Liberals or even Dems support a flat tax? Benefits packages that apply equally to single or married, rich or poor, on a racial basis?
5.)In fact if they supported and worked for true equality, then marriage status wouldn't even matter. Nope, they are on the "I get the best deal and screw all others" gravy train.

1.) oh so you are just making things up based on your unsupportable opinion? got it
2.) not liberal nor are those things about equality or denying rights lol
in fact AA/EEO by definition is about equality. But again nothing to do with this topic nor does it support your already failed statement.
3.) factual examples and proof? you keep skipping this part
4.) i know lots of people for and against flat tax and they are a mix of right left gay and straight meanignless to your failed and false statment and this thread
5.) not fact your opinion that you cant support lol

thank you for proving my point, your statement was made up and factually false
 
equality, SCOTUS rulings, 1000s of court cases etc look them up.

If you dont like this fact write your congressman, SCOTUS etc and they will help further educate you on this fact
 
It sounds more like you never met a gay person. All you're doing is generalizing. There are gay christians, repubs, you name it. All being gay does is make someone attracted to same sex.

DING DING DING DING

bingo!

you nailed it, it was all made up crap that cant be backed up lol
 
equality, SCOTUS rulings, 1000s of court cases etc look them up.

If you dont like this fact write your congressman, SCOTUS etc and they will help further educate you on this fact

And "SCOTUS" of course has always been right? Cool, know where I can buy a slave? SCOTUS once upon a time said I had that right also.
 
1.) oh so you are just making things up based on your unsupportable opinion? got it
2.) not liberal nor are those things about equality or denying rights lol
in fact AA/EEO by definition is about equality. But again nothing to do with this topic nor does it support your already failed statement.
3.) factual examples and proof? you keep skipping this part
4.) i know lots of people for and against flat tax and they are a mix of right left gay and straight meanignless to your failed and false statment and this thread
5.) not fact your opinion that you cant support lol

thank you for proving my point, your statement was made up and factually false

So basically, If you believe it to be true, then it cannot in anyway be denying someone else a "right"?
 
1.)And "SCOTUS" of course has always been right? Cool, know where I can buy a slave? SCOTUS once upon a time said I had that right also.

never claimed that, thank you for posting a meanignless failed strawman though. LMAO
But they made this rulling 14 times along with 1000+ other lower court rullinns :)

let us know when you have somethign factual that supports you . . .
 
So basically, If you believe it to be true, then it cannot in anyway be denying someone else a "right"?

wrong again, you seemed to be easily confused

my beliefs play ZERO roll in this discussion nor have i mentioned them


again please let us know when you have somethign factual that supports your failed and false statment
 
The Arkansas case only applies to a specific county. It has not been ruled on at the state level yet.



This is not doing it state-by-state. We are talking federal courts making rulings based on their own dubious "interpretation" of the U.S. Constitution. It is being done "state-by-state" in the sense that a blatantly organized campaign to have non-recognition of gay marriage declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court is being waged state-by-state to increase the chances of it succeeding. It is no coincidence that the first states targeted are some of the most conservative states on the issue.

That might not be wholely correct, although it is still an Arkansas judge ruling on the an Arkansas constutitional provision, there is no indication that the judges jurisdiction is only the 3rd district. I agree this is very preliminary, but disagree that it has only effect in Pulaski county...I could be wrong.
 
wrong again, you seemed to be easily confused

my beliefs play ZERO roll in this discussion nor have i mentioned them


again please let us know when you have somethign factual that supports your failed and false statment

You mention them constantly, do you think that I'm the only one on the board that doesn't translate "fact" when you use it as meaning your opinion.

Fact, majority of Homosexuals are Liberal (dems).
Fact, Dems do not support true equality.
Fact, AA is based upon race, among other things, making it factually racist.
Fact Homosexuals supporting Liberals are not in fact promoting equality. Especially not equality based upon merit.
Fact Homosexual marriage is NOT supporting true equality.
 
You mention them constantly, do you think that I'm the only one on the board that doesn't translate "fact" when you use it as meaning your opinion.

2.)Fact, majority of Homosexuals are Liberal (dems).
3.) Fact, Dems do not support true equality.
4.) Fact, AA is based upon race, among other things, making it factually racist.
5.) Fact Homosexuals supporting Liberals are not in fact promoting equality. Especially not equality based upon merit.
6.) Fact Homosexual marriage is NOT supporting true equality.

1.) post this lie as much as you want nobody educated, honest and objective will buy it lol
2.) maybe, I dont know all of them nor do i know how you are declaring one to be a liberal
3.) false, your opinion
4.) false your opinion and factually not true LMAO
5.) false your opinion
6.) false your opinion and factually not true

gain please let us know when you have somethign factual that supports your failed and false statwment, one fact
 
So you deny that the majority of gays vote liberal?
LGBT Americans Skew Democratic, Largely Support Obama

Of course the majority would vote "dem" because the other major party openly hates and discriminates against LGBT, just as most blacks and hispanic vote "dem" for similar reasons, but to say "blacks/hispanic/LGBT are liberal and deny rights to others" is another matter entirely.

But even if all you said was true, it wouldn't compare to flat out denying marriage rights to ALL republicans/conservatives

That would be a fair comparison. Perhaps we should aim for that
 
Of course the majority would vote "dem" because the other major party openly hates and discriminates against LGBT, just as most blacks and hispanic vote "dem" for similar reasons, but to say "blacks/hispanic/LGBT are liberal and deny rights to others" is another matter entirely.

But even if all you said was true, it wouldn't compare to flat out denying marriage rights to ALL republicans/conservatives

That would be a fair comparison. Perhaps we should aim for that

If they vote Dem, then they are in fact supporting the denial of some "rights" to others.
 
You mention them constantly, do you think that I'm the only one on the board that doesn't translate "fact" when you use it as meaning your opinion.

Fact, majority of Homosexuals are Liberal (dems).
Fact, Dems do not support true equality.
Fact, AA is based upon race, among other things, making it factually racist.
Fact Homosexuals supporting Liberals are not in fact promoting equality. Especially not equality based upon merit.
Fact Homosexual marriage is NOT supporting true equality.

Your major problem is that you are trying to attach beliefs/positions to a general label of "Democrat". Just because a person identifies with a political party, does not mean that they have to support every single thing that party supports.

Same sex marriage is absolutely supporting equality. No one is treated more unequally after same sex couples are allowed to marry than before they are.
 
If they vote Dem, then they are in fact supporting the denial of some "rights" to others.

nope just an OPINION LMAO
hell if one was to make such a stupid, unsupportable and mentally inept "statement" like that they could apply that severely uneducated and dishonest logic to any voting.
 
If they vote Dem, then they are in fact supporting the denial of some "rights" to others.

No, they aren't. Heck, even some candidates do not completely support everything their party does as a whole.
 
Back
Top Bottom