• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI investigating Bundy supporters in BLM dispute[W:338]

Where I'm going is obvious - however where you're going is to Stalinville.

No, what was your point in posting the link "western expansion"? :roll:
 
I bet you don't have a problem with people leaching off the government for free phones, food stamps and welfare money for an unlimited period of time.

Furthermore if you knew your history you would know that during the western migration the government actually gave land to those willing to go west and establish the west and it appears that Bundy's family took the government up on that so therefor it's his land - not the governments.

Furthermore, even if you want to insist it is government property - who gives a **** if cows are eating grass? It's not exactly like the government is using the land - not that they could because it doesn't even belong to them.

No. BLM land is not OWNED by individuals, it is public land...what part of 'public' dont you understand? You dont 'lease' your own land. That land is a resource that belongs to all Americans and he had a lease to use it.
 
Yeah, how DARE that FBI come out and investigate a group that is posting armed checkpoints demanding identification from people who are driving on PUBLIC roads through the area!

I mean, really - how is it "freedom" and "liberty" when they're posting armed checkpoints demanding ID from people driving on public roads? Dude, y'all really need to get a clue.

I to this date have seen NOTHING proving the false claim of checkpoints being instituted....This is more propaganda.
 
Were there shots fired? The right to bear arms doesnt exclude a protest; a sit in if you will

By that logic, you would have had Rosa Parks thrown in the slammer.

Was she packing heat?
 
My politics shouldn't be controversial - they should be embraced, and it's a sad day in the United States where the people side with the government over the people.

People are not always right but in this case they are - not from a subjective position but from a Bill of Rights position - and if one really wants to start a fire - a Constitutional position.

Now I must do as all evil white males do and go listen to Metallica - just to prove to myself how dominate I am and how superior I feel.

Ride The Lightning makes my **** feel a few inches bigger and certainly boosts my ego and makes me feel a lot more superior over woman...

Sorry chicks - I promise I will listen to "Republica" later....
 
You are still ignoring the reality of the situation I see....

From the article that you refuse to read...

"Bundy supporters have been adamant in saying no weapons were aimed at the feds or police, that the BLM rangers were the ones pointing guns."

So, at worst we have a 'he said, she said' situation.
 
My politics shouldn't be controversial - they should be embraced, and it's a sad day in the United States where the people side with the government over the people.

People are not always right but in this case they are - not from a subjective position but from a Bill of Rights position - and if one really wants to start a fire - a Constitutional position.

Now I must do as all evil white males do and go listen to Metallica - just to prove to myself how dominate I am and how superior I feel.

Ride The Lightning makes my **** feel a few inches bigger and certainly boosts my ego and makes me feel a lot more superior over woman...

Sorry chicks - I promise I will listen to "Republica" later....

tZO7s.gif
 
Do you have a right to bully the government when you have no right to graze on public land?

You seem to applaud the government bullying private citizens....
 
No, what was your point in posting the link "western expansion"? :roll:

What?

Are you seriously ignorant to the Western Expansion/Western Migration?

WTF???
 
From the article that you refuse to read...

"Bundy supporters have been adamant in saying no weapons were aimed at the feds or police, that the BLM rangers were the ones pointing guns."

So, at worst we have a 'he said, she said' situation.

They weren't aiming weapons at the feds?
Were they just waiting for the government to shoot their women so they could have a good propaganda picture?
 
They weren't aiming weapons at the feds?
Were they just waiting for the government to shoot their women so they could have a good propaganda picture?

So far, I've only seen evidence of one person pointing his weapon in the direction of the Feds. Do you have anymore?
 
No, what was your point in posting the link "western expansion"? :roll:

I'm sorry but your comment just destroyed the world...

Do you at least know what the **** a 49'er is??? of course in your mind its a football player with a big dick but.....
 
They weren't aiming weapons at the feds?
Were they just waiting for the government to shoot their women so they could have a good propaganda picture?

Typical ploy of the liberal left Ditto...Take one nut within, and project that to all within....I thought you were better than that.
 
So far, I've only seen evidence of one person pointing his weapon in the direction of the Feds. Do you have anymore?

No, I don't.

Perhaps they really were waiting for their women to be shot.
 
Typical ploy of the liberal left Ditto...Take one nut within, and project that to all within....I thought you were better than that.

Is it the left who thinks that guys like Bundy should have to pay for grazing rights?

If that's so, then it must be the conservatives who think the government should give away use of the land for free.
 
Pathetic Ditto.

No what's really pathetic here is you attempting to defend these jack offs and the dead beat they're defending.

I've saved this thread for the next time you start babbling on about "we're a nation of laws" crap.
 
What?

Are you seriously ignorant to the Western Expansion/Western Migration?

WTF???

Are you seriously trying to avoid telling me what your point is? Do you even have one?
 
Is it the left who thinks that guys like Bundy should have to pay for grazing rights?

If that's so, then it must be the conservatives who think the government should give away use of the land for free.

Oh so you're backing off your inflammatory characterizations? And changing the subject eh? Sorry dude your credibility is shot in this one....Back to class....
 
They weren't aiming weapons at the feds?
Were they just waiting for the government to shoot their women so they could have a good propaganda picture?

There's only been a handful of pictures of one guy - the same guy, from different angles - and in none of them can you see a federal officer on the receiving end of the gun. None.
 
No what's really pathetic here is you attempting to defend these jack offs and the dead beat they're defending.

I've saved this thread for the next time you start babbling on about "we're a nation of laws" crap.

Get a life Jet....You've "saved" the thread? Maybe you need some anger counseling or something...:roll:

I have always maintained that Bundy should pay his fines....But obviously you are too blind to see that, so now you're going to start making **** up....Good luck with that one...
 
Get a life Jet....You've "saved" the thread? Maybe you need some anger counseling or something...:roll:

I have always maintained that Bundy should pay his fines....But obviously you are too blind to see that, so now you're going to start making **** up....Good luck with that one...

If you believe that Bundy should have paid his fines and are opposed to the current situation (to be fair, i am also opposed to the current situation), what alternative do you suggest, given that Bundy has made his choice?
 
Back
Top Bottom