- Joined
- Sep 30, 2013
- Messages
- 61,639
- Reaction score
- 64,924
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Still not reading the article I see....
You are still ignoring the reality of the situation I see....
Still not reading the article I see....
...and I will have to remember you class hatred for poor people that is so strong you wish to see them put in prison ...just for being poor.
So waddya think ... will Holder be more focused on Bundy or following on Lerner's contempt citation.
About time the FBI did something.
About time the FBI did something.
Keep thinking that. When or if it every goes down, please stay on the side line and learn to bow to your masters.
So, the 2nd Amendment doesn't apply?
That's not probable cause...lol!
Bundy's thugs are threatening BLM employees with death threats. If that doesn't require an FBI investigation, then what does?
"....With anti-government sentiments roiling in the aftermath of Cliven Bundy’s Nevada standoff, government workers in western Utah are stripping BLM logos from their vehicles after two motorists brandished a gun and displayed a threatening sign at a federal wrangler who was driving Tuesday in Juab County.
The wrangler was driving a load of horses and burros north on Interstate 15 about 11 a.m. near Mills when a dark blue Dodge 1500 extended-cab pickup pulled up alongside the wrangler. The two occupants "told him he was No. 1 with that certain gesture," said Eric Reid, the wrangler’s supervisor at the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s Fillmore Field Office.
The pickup fell back and the wrangler continued north. A few minutes later, the pickup reappeared, Reid said. The men, wearing hoods, held up a sign, apparently scrawled on a piece of paper, that read, "You need to die." One of the men pointed what appeared to be a Glock handgun at the wrangler.
The wrangler tried to make out a license plate number, but the plate had been covered with duct tape, Reid said....read...
BLM workers on alert after wrangler threatened with gun on I-15 | The Salt Lake Tribune
What the hell do you expect? peaceful resistance?
I know in progressiveland brainwashing is the optimal way to control a society and that violence is only acceptable if it is for a progressive cause....
Painting these individuals as lunatics is insane.
What do you expect them to do - or better yet how do you believe they should react?
Sometimes it takes a gun and a concerned individual to present a message - and the only time that is OK is when the message is backed by or in support of civil liberties.
What the hell do you expect? peaceful resistance?
I know in progressiveland brainwashing is the optimal way to control a society and that violence is only acceptable if it is for a progressive cause....
Painting these individuals as lunatics is insane.
What do you expect them to do - or better yet how do you believe they should react?
Sometimes it takes a gun and a concerned individual to present a message - and the only time that is OK is when the message is backed by or in support of civil liberties.
Using weapons as a threat to bar federal agents from enforcing the law is not covered, no.
No, a court order is past the point of probable cause. This isn't a traffic stop. Due process had been carried out, and a judge ordered his punishment.
If those people would have fought for freedom and equal rights for the Black slaves and the women in the colonies also I'd have a lot more respect for them.
Times were different. But in the end this is a nation with many freedoms and my protections for those freedoms.
They've crossed the line from loonies to outright thugs. You're borderline yourself with that kind of talk.
But it's fine for federal agents to bring rifles to threaten you with violence even when you have not acted as a danger to the public in any way? Seems to be a bit of a double standard there, sport.
Holy **** he's literally supporting death threats in defense of the civil liberty to mooch off the public dime, are you sure you're not the progressive one here?
If armed men were stopping US citizens and demanding ID while wearing turbans instead of cowboy hats, you really want to tell me you'd be thinking they're freedom fighters?
I hope you don't really believe that.You claim "borderline" because I dissent - and dissent is dangerous to the typical corn-fed citizen, because it challenges everything they commonly accept as reality.
****, in an ideal progressive society they'd either kill me, purge me, throw me in a gulag or a mental hospital for going against the grain.
Using weapons as a threat to bar federal agents from enforcing the law is not covered, no.
No, a court order is past the point of probable cause. This isn't a traffic stop. Due process had been carried out, and a judge ordered his punishment.
I love the fact that these militia guys are referred to as thugs, terrorists, etc...
I hope you don't really believe that.
Waving an American flag while breaking the law and threatening people doesn't seem to be convincing anyone except Bundy apologists.
That's because they are defying the government.
I love the fact that these militia guys are referred to as thugs, terrorists, etc... even though they have not done even .0000000001% of any violence that the violent OWS protesters did... the OWS protesters who were and still are championed by the left.
the smell of political fauxrage is overwhelming...
So, when we have people who confront law enforcement with guns in order to keep them from evicting a freeloader who refuses to pay for the use of federal lands, who offer to put their women on the front lines so that, should the shooting start, the agents will look bad for shooting them (remember: Taliban) then the FBI is likely to want to investigate those people.
Who saw that one coming?
I hope you don't really believe that.
Waving an American flag while breaking the law and threatening people doesn't seem to be convincing anyone except Bundy apologists.