• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI investigating Bundy supporters in BLM dispute[W:338]

Reaching? Why? It's been done before. :shrug:

Yes, indeed, reaching has been done before, and will no doubt cont... Oh, my bad. "I'ts" obviously refers to putting a plant in a photo and faking a situation.

Well, that has happened before, and no doubt will continue to happen. So, what makes you think that the gunman in question is a plant this time?
 
Ok, I'll agree with that. But in honesty how do we know that he is even part of any militia? He could have been just a stooge friend of the photographer used for staged propaganda.

He could also have been a Ugandan albino witch doctor marathon runner who just laid down to rest next to an abandoned rifle that magically lifted itself onto his hands.
 
So what your telling me, is that instead of purchasing the land, they would rather live off it for free. What is the difference between them and the welfare queens who live in public housing and are not responsible for providing for themselves an society in a meaningful way?

Okay, I'll concede.

A place, near Hatch, New Mexico, we camped, and camped, and camped to our heart's content, about 2 weeks, FREE OF CHARGE, on BLM land, awesome, just coyotes howling the night away.

We even camped for FREE in the Cibola and Gila National Forests, dang I feel SO GUILTY!
 
Yes, indeed, reaching has been done before, and will no doubt cont... Oh, my bad. "I'ts" obviously refers to putting a plant in a photo and faking a situation.

Well, that has happened before, and no doubt will continue to happen. So, what makes you think that the gunman in question is a plant this time?

Only such photo to emerge, along with the repeated narrative accompanying it.
 
Okay, I'll concede.

A place, near Hatch, New Mexico, we camped, and camped, and camped to our heart's content, about 2 weeks, FREE OF CHARGE, on BLM land, awesome, just coyotes howling the night away.

We even camped for FREE in the Cibola and Gila National Forests, dang I feel SO GUILTY!

We camp for free every year on BLM land, too. Miles and miles of freedom everywhere you look. The only request is that we clean up after ourselves and not destroy, harm, or take any wildlife or artifacts.
 
He could also have been a Ugandan albino witch doctor marathon runner who just laid down to rest next to an abandoned rifle that magically lifted itself onto his hands.

Oh, you think so? :roll:
 

really

We conclude that the picture shows a plant. There were, of course, lots of pictures taken of the standoff between the freeloader's supporters and government agents, so the picture of one guy with a rifle would not be critical.

now, your evidence that the rifleman was a plant is.... ???
 
We camp for free every year on BLM land, too. Miles and miles of freedom everywhere you look. The only request is that we clean up after ourselves and not destroy, harm, or take any wildlife or artifacts.

There ya go! Happy camping to you & Family!
 
So, here it comes....Round 2.

And in true authoritarian style, a full propaganda effort will accompany the suppression of any possible uprising to ensure that the sheep soaking up the reports will know who "the bad guy" is supposed to be....

Remember Orwell.....​OBEY!



I think anyone supporting Bundy should be investigated because they are a bubble off. If they are armed, they are two bubbles off. If they belong to an organizied group supporting Bundy, they are three bubbles off. Keeerissssst, he never paid the land use fees and fattened his herd free. He has no ancestral rights. Aieee chihuaha, Bundy has no brain, just enough money to think he is entitled to Corporate Welfare. He's a wellie queen and forgot to be wearing his disguise.
 
really

We conclude that the picture shows a plant. There were, of course, lots of pictures taken of the standoff between the freeloader's supporters and government agents, so the picture of one guy with a rifle would not be critical.

now, your evidence that the rifleman was a plant is.... ???

Produce another pic of militia pointing a weapon at an agent. You can't. The conclusion of your question is clear. This is a false narrative against the protesters making it easier to engage them in the future without the outrage.
 
I think anyone supporting Bundy should be investigated because they are a bubble off. If they are armed, they are two bubbles off. If they belong to an organizied group supporting Bundy, they are three bubbles off. Keeerissssst, he never paid the land use fees and fattened his herd free. He has no ancestral rights. Aieee chihuaha, Bundy has no brain, just enough money to think he is entitled to Corporate Welfare. He's a wellie queen and forgot to be wearing his disguise.

So, anyone not backing government action should be investigated eh...isn't that what communists also believe, and practice? I think so.
 
Produce another pic of militia pointing a weapon at an agent. You can't. The conclusion of your question is clear. This is a false narrative against the protesters making it easier to engage them in the future without the outrage.
As I said, that's really reaching.

but then, reaching has been done before and will, no doubt be done again.
 
So, here it comes....Round 2.

And in true authoritarian style, a full propaganda effort will accompany the suppression of any possible uprising to ensure that the sheep soaking up the reports will know who "the bad guy" is supposed to be....

Remember Orwell.....​OBEY!

How dare those authoritarian law enforcement officials investigate criminal activity!
 
Talking in circles dishonestly doesn't prove your point.

But looking at a picture and saying, "that must be a plant" because there have been plants before is proving yours, sure.
 
Bbbbbut he wasn't really aiming at anyone, well.....
Well that's the thing, he didn't need to be aiming at anyone. Even if he were aiming at the ground, his gun was pointed in their general direction, and that's all it takes for reckless endangerment.
 
Ok, I'll agree with that. But in honesty how do we know that he is even part of any militia? He could have been just a stooge friend of the photographer used for staged propaganda.
We actually know that he's not part of any of the militia groups at the Bundy ranch. He said so in an interview someone else posted earlier.

When you aren't operating under orders, you are personally liable for everything you do. These militia were not called to muster and are not operating under a proper authority, so they are not more than armed protesters, each individually liable for what they do.
 
Well that's the thing, he didn't need to be aiming at anyone. Even if he were aiming at the ground, his gun was pointed in their general direction, and that's all it takes for reckless endangerment.

In the photo posted over and over again, aiming the firearm down range, we see the BLM LE in the background, in the foreground behind a picket line or cattle gate fence are the protesters, some women, men and children. What kind of a nut would point in the direction of your own group?

Some have said the photo was a staged event. Some have said how does anyone know if the rifle was loaded or not.

In any firearms safety course that I've been to, you are taught never to point a firearm downrange with people in sight, and to always, always treat every firearm loaded or not, as if it were loaded.

All I can think of saying is that it's a good thing nothing went terribly bad.
 
I never said "must"... that is your dishonesty.

I'd go with most likely is not, probably isn't, and most certainly isn't proven to be.

But not probably is, even though there is not evidence that he is.
 
Back
Top Bottom