32 “Whoever acknowledges me before others, I will also acknowledge before my Father in heaven. 33 But whoever disowns me before others, I will disown before my Father in heaven.
And yes - many of these radical AGW proponents are former Green Peace members - excommunicated members I might add.
I don't want to get too off topic here but the history of Green Peace is an extremely interesting story. I don't want to spoil it for you in case you have interest in researching Green Peace, but the founders actually left the organization because it became infested with anti-humanity and communist ilk in which the founders never wanted and anti-human and communism was never a strategy of Green Peace..
I just cannot fault the guys too much, who are just trying to get tenure,
there are not a lot of grant choices out there.
Most just want to make a living, and get to where they can do the research they really want to do.
All I see are a bunch of radical activists that hide behind their "degrees" and who are unwilling to even ponder alternate ideas.
I would call them narrow-minded fools not "experts."
Real experts wouldn't be intimidated by someone challenging their "science" but the real reason these clowns er "experts" are intimidated is because every intelligent person who understands this science damn well knows these so called "experts" findings are epic bull**** and they have proven that time and time again. That is why these so called "experts" are very defensive and protective of their botched, manipulated and half-assed data.
Now, if I had a remarkable theory I would love for it to be criticized - then again I don't share the same traits with the scientific community which generally consist of competitiveness, contempt and arrogance.
Also, Stephen Hawking could come out and say that AGW (man made global warming) is epic bull**** and not one of these so called confident experts would even question him - that goes to show how utterly zombie like these alleged "experts" really are.
Now some of these "experts" are really good scientists however that doesn't mean they're not greedy, corrupt or are portraying lies to perpetuate their own politics on humanity.
BTW, the worst thing you can do is just blindly trust someone just because they have credentials that may or may not make them an "expert" on something.
This says it all.
Many Trump supporters have lots of problems, and those deplorables are bringing those problems to us. They’re racists. They’re misogynists. They’re islamophobic. They're xenophobes and homophobes. And some, I assume, are good people.
Originally Posted by Tim the plumber View Post
You have a far too high opinion of human intelligence.
We both know that there are many people on this forum who are, for whatever reason, incapable of understanding very basic concepts in physics.
And yes both sides of the debate are carrying around those who say things with enormous confidence whilst obviously knowing virtually nothing.
Also, as far as I'm concerned tenure is absolute nonsense. In what other jobs do employees get "tenure." It seems to me that when a professor gets tenure he/she just goes bat**** crazy spewing all kinds of nonsense that would have otherwise have gotten him/her fired if they weren't tenured.
That is always why generally the most controversial college courses are taught by tenured faculty.
I took a course in anthropology and I can tell you this much - it was one of the most bizarre courses I have ever taken in my life - the professor (tenured) pretty much stood on a soapbox for 90 minutes demonizing everything he could think of. Oh, the clown also gave me a C for contradicting his insane rants with facts and alternative motives and ideas he was demonizing. Quite frankly I felt like I was watching Hitler at the time.
The guy wasn't teaching anything he was just ranting - I've never seen anyone in my life that hated US culture as much has he did. The guy was seriously off his meds or lost his marbles long ago, however sadly the guy couldn't be fired for his extreme views he tried to pass of as an education.
The quality of thought in the alarmist community has really gone down hill. I guess they think that if they get really, really, really shrill that people will start paying attention to them. It's exactly the opposite, in fact, that is happening. The more shrill they get with their obviously over the top claims the less their credibility.
“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert”. – J Robert Oppenheimer.