Page 19 of 20 FirstFirst ... 917181920 LastLast
Results 181 to 190 of 195

Thread: U.S. Supreme Court declines new gun regulations challenge

  1. #181
    Haters gon' hate
    MarineTpartier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Last Seen
    01-04-16 @ 04:58 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    5,586
    Blog Entries
    8

    Re: U.S. Supreme Court declines new gun regulations challenge

    Quote Originally Posted by Winchester View Post
    I personally would like to see a lawsuit challenging the need for a CCW permit in the first place.
    Totally friggin agree bro. Why do I need to be licensed to carry a gun? I just moved to a state the takes up to 90 days to process a CC permit. Meanwhile, I have one of two choices. 1) Not carry and have mine and my family's lives in danger 2) Break the law and carry and protect my family. No American should ever be presented with that dilemma. I should be able to carry however I want, regardless of state laws. I am all about state's rights, however, I'm not a fan of a state infringing on my constitutional rights with their own version of what keep and bear arms means. I'm good with a background check (no wait period). They are so fast at this point, it shouldn't be an issue. After that, I should be able to carry whatever I want, however I want.
    “Mr. Speaker, I once again find myself compelled to vote against the annual budget resolution for a very simple reason: it makes government bigger.” ― Ron Paul
    Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty. – Thomas Jefferson

  2. #182
    Sage

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    okla-freakin-homa
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:35 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    12,626

    Re: U.S. Supreme Court declines new gun regulations challenge

    Quote Originally Posted by TurtleDude View Post
    Look dude most of the stuff you post on gun politics is nothing more than a passive aggressive attack on pro gun posters who tire of the Democrat Party's attacks on gun rights. I get tired of you projecting your phobias on to the rest of us or insinuating that those of us who think all free citizens of age ought to be able to own the same rifle as our tax dollars supply the military and the civilian police departments.
    Not insinuating a damn thing Dude, YOU have claimed repeatedly you should be able to own what Commissioned Law Enforcement and the military are issued. YOU used the 'biker gang assault' in a CON attempt to justify owning such weapons and the high cap mag.

    In this thread you use the 'fear of your fellow citizen' on some one apparently for firearm regulations when you have used the EXACT same 'fear' to justify military weaponry...

    Hoisted on your own petard and all that sort of thing.

  3. #183
    Guru

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    In a Blue State
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:50 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    4,733

    Re: U.S. Supreme Court declines new gun regulations challenge

    Quote Originally Posted by Summerwind View Post
    I tried, Idaho didn't want the information until after my handgun was stolen because I left it at home to enter a "gun-free" zone on a day I was burgled. Then they wanted that information, not until though. I did try.
    Out of curiosity, did they get it from your safe or biometric lock?
    We went from sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me to safe spaces.

  4. #184
    Don't Give a Rat's Ass
    SMTA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    OH
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:40 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    21,870

    Re: U.S. Supreme Court declines new gun regulations challenge

    Quote Originally Posted by TurtleDude View Post
    Look dude

    most of the stuff you post on gun politics is nothing more than a passive aggressive attack on pro gun posters who tire of the Democrat Party's attacks on gun rights. I get tired of you projecting your phobias on to the rest of us or insinuating that those of us who think all free citizens of age ought to be able to own the same rifle as our tax dollars supply the military and the civilian police departments.
    That about covers it.

    Uneducated fear and ignorance by him that must be applied to the rest of us.

    He just needs to take his huge bag of fear and step aside and let normal folks play through.
    Greatness lies not in being strong, but in the right use of strength - Henry Ward Beecher
    Baby sister, I was born game and I intend to go out that way - Rooster Cogburn

  5. #185
    Tavern Bartender
    Constitutionalist
    American's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:49 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    76,323

    Re: U.S. Supreme Court declines new gun regulations challenge

    Quote Originally Posted by Paxaeon View Post
    `
    Wrong. Ideologically extreme men with guns will shoot to kill another man who took an oath to follow the law. Society just saw an example of the gun totting people at the Bundy ranch. There is much to fear when ignorance has a gun in its hand.
    Like FBI agents at Ruby Ridge.
    "He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
    "Fly-over" country voted, and The Donald is now POTUS.

  6. #186
    Sage
    Lursa's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Outside Seattle
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:14 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    29,964

    Re: U.S. Supreme Court declines new gun regulations challenge

    Quote Originally Posted by Summerwind View Post
    Those were required in Idaho, so yes, I completed an FBI check and a gun safety/laws/usage course. Can you not read? How bizarre that you are asking what's been clearly discussed. I also did so in Washington though someone has suggested I didn't need to.
    You do need the background check in WA. Just no training, safety, etc courses.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bucky View Post
    I have felt pain when I was in the womb. So when you say they are incapable of feeling pain, that is based on junk science.
    Quote Originally Posted by applejuicefool View Post
    A murderer putting a bullet through someone's brain is a medical procedure too.

  7. #187
    Sage
    Lursa's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Outside Seattle
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:14 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    29,964

    Re: U.S. Supreme Court declines new gun regulations challenge

    Quote Originally Posted by notquiteright View Post
    In general it is best to never say in general.

    High altitude engagements in a densely packed thin skin tube is rather unique. High stress, difficult shot scenarios do require far more training than the average CCW graduate possesses. Many advanced classes have the student put into a high stress engagement to struggle- not being mean but to show there is a bit to know, practice and commit to muscle memory.

    far more difficult to ingrain is the so-called 'killer instinct' as it really is neither in a well trained person. Funny the times a highly trained shootist is a miserable failure at 'sealing the deal' when in a deadly encounter. The time honored double or triple tap is quickly forgotten and it is back to target practice 'shoot and observe' one round at a time.

    But a citizen with no real training in the 'gun-fight' or history of mental defect will fire multiple rounds to include a coup de grace in multiple people.

    So best to in general never say in general...
    So in the airplane scenario. Good, that's all I asked.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bucky View Post
    I have felt pain when I was in the womb. So when you say they are incapable of feeling pain, that is based on junk science.
    Quote Originally Posted by applejuicefool View Post
    A murderer putting a bullet through someone's brain is a medical procedure too.

  8. #188
    Sage
    Lursa's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Outside Seattle
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:14 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    29,964

    Re: U.S. Supreme Court declines new gun regulations challenge

    Quote Originally Posted by Summerwind View Post
    My opinion is based solely on what the carelessness you were bragging about. If you didn't want to share that information, you shouldn't have typed it. You did, you exposed yourself.
    What carelessness did he write about?
    Quote Originally Posted by Bucky View Post
    I have felt pain when I was in the womb. So when you say they are incapable of feeling pain, that is based on junk science.
    Quote Originally Posted by applejuicefool View Post
    A murderer putting a bullet through someone's brain is a medical procedure too.

  9. #189
    Powered by diesel
    EMNofSeattle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Grapeview, Washington
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:06 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    7,941

    Re: U.S. Supreme Court declines new gun regulations challenge

    Quote Originally Posted by Summerwind View Post
    Those were required in Idaho, so yes, I completed an FBI check and a gun safety/laws/usage course. Can you not read? How bizarre that you are asking what's been clearly discussed. I also did so in Washington though someone has suggested I didn't need to.
    you don't need. that's the law. the only requirements in WA are fingerprints and a check.... no training is required for WA's CPL (which I think is a good thing.... licenses should be easy if the state requires them)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Chuckles View Post
    No one cares about your stupid hippy logic
    "Be careful of averages, the average person has one breast and one testicle"
    -Dixy Lee Ray

  10. #190
    warrior of the wetlands
    TurtleDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:49 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    180,715

    Re: U.S. Supreme Court declines new gun regulations challenge

    Quote Originally Posted by SMTA View Post
    That about covers it.

    Uneducated fear and ignorance by him that must be applied to the rest of us.

    He just needs to take his huge bag of fear and step aside and let normal folks play through.
    I get tired of people who pretend to be pro gun but feel a need to bash real pro gun posters because we have no use for the Democrat party's constant war on gun owners.



Page 19 of 20 FirstFirst ... 917181920 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •