• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ex-White House Official On Benghazi: 'Dude, This Was Like Two Years Ago'

Letting them die is the same decision Obama arrived at also.

Which is, of course, another lie. Obama did not "let them die." There was nothing he could do to save them. But that doesn't matter to you, who has no qualms about using four dead Americans as props to attack the President.
 
Letting them die is the same decision Obama arrived at also.

Why did the senior officer present not order an immediate evacuation of that untenable position knowing he was understaffed, not at a firebase, and with no orders to hold that position at Any cost?
 
Which is, of course, another lie. Obama did not "let them die." There was nothing he could do to save them. But that doesn't matter to you, who has no qualms about using four dead Americans as props to attack the President.

Oh Boo hoo for you. He did let them die in favor of covering it up so that it didn't hurt the campaign ...
 
Oh Boo hoo for you. He did let them die in favor of covering it up so that it didn't hurt the campaign ...

That's nonsense. Hackish garbage.
 
Translation: it's the truth.

What you said makes zero sense on its face. You think that Obama made a conscious decision to deny help and allow the embassy to be stormed, just so he could cover it up later? That's utterly ****ing asinine. Quite literally one of the stupidest things I've ever read. Congratulations.
 
What you said makes zero sense on its face. You think that Obama made a conscious decision to deny help and allow the embassy to be stormed, just so he could cover it up later? That's utterly ****ing asinine. Quite literally one of the stupidest things I've ever read. Congratulations.
If anything, it would only have been a conscious decision to not make a decision about something, which led to nothing being done to avoid or stop the event which then transpired.

At worst.

Well, no, I suppose worst would be that Obama wanted his own ambassador dead and let it happen, but that's conspiracy theory territory.
 
Which is, of course, another lie. Obama did not "let them die." There was nothing he could do to save them. But that doesn't matter to you, who has no qualms about using four dead Americans as props to attack the President.
In fact there were people ready to move in an instant and all they needed was word from the Commander in Chief. But the C in C was packing for his fund raising in Vegas and ignored them.
 
What you said makes zero sense on its face. You think that Obama made a conscious decision to deny help and allow the embassy to be stormed, just so he could cover it up later? That's utterly ****ing asinine. Quite literally one of the stupidest things I've ever read. Congratulations.

What is it that you believe Barrack Obama did to try and save these men?
 
In fact there were people ready to move in an instant and all they needed was word from the Commander in Chief. But the C in C was packing for his fund raising in Vegas and ignored them.

And there was nothing those people could have done to help the four who died. This has been well established.

What is it that you believe Barrack Obama did to try and save these men?

There was nothing he could do. This has been well established.
 
And there was nothing those people could have done to help the four who died. This has been well established.



There was nothing he could do. This has been well established.

Well established by whom? Ben Rhodes again?
 
Are you kidding? It's still being told today as though it were valid by people in here.

And as a result of testimony being given under oath more than a law has indeed been broken.

Show me a law Obama broke.
 
What's silly? The President goes into hiding, Ben Rhodes tells the President, the Sec Of State and the UN Ambassador to say a video was behind this 'protest' and that's just what they do. Ben Rhodes, a political press guy, is pulling the strings behind the curtains on this hapless bunch.

:roll::roll::roll:
 
Well established by whom? Ben Rhodes again?

Since they never tried, we'll never know. It's one thing to say you tried, and it's totally another to say it wasn't worth the effort, so we didn't even bother.
 
In fact there were people ready to move in an instant and all they needed was word from the Commander in Chief. But the C in C was packing for his fund raising in Vegas and ignored them.

i did not know our military system can not act without the go ahead of the president.
 
Yes, it's odd that a member of the Muslim Brotherhood should get a copy of that memo but not the American media or the American people.

well Obama was playing to his base.. the MB.

The people of the USA that Obama cant puppet like blind fools are the enemy...
 
Last edited:
Which is, of course, another lie. Obama did not "let them die." There was nothing he could do to save them. But that doesn't matter to you, who has no qualms about using four dead Americans as props to attack the President.

says who? you?

props? are you for real?
 
In fact there were people ready to move in an instant and all they needed was word from the Commander in Chief. But the C in C was packing for his fund raising in Vegas and ignored them.

They requested support for weeks... Obama's cast of morons did not send back up, that CREATES the conditions on the ground that led to this attack on 9/11. Tis did not fit with Obama campaign bumper sticker slogans ...

notice not one Obama zelot ever mention that day of thise attack..
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom