• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ex-White House Official On Benghazi: 'Dude, This Was Like Two Years Ago'

Here is a much longer version of the video:



Bret Baier is an a-hole IMO.


Yes, he dared contradict the White Houses false narrative so he's a bad man...
 
Obama couldn't even be bothered to walk downstairs to the situation room at the WH while bullets were still flying. Hillary couldn't be bothered for months to sign off on increased security at a consulate in a war zone.

They should both be offered the Ambassadorship to Libya in 2017.

Didn't he have a fund-raising event to attend to?
 
Yes, he dared contradict the White Houses false narrative so he's a bad man...

I'm sure he read that on Media Matters.
 
Only a lib would think that being upset about needless American deaths is political. I think it is you being political here and your callousness about people being left to die is sickening.


Many of us were when you guys were not. But, the fact is that it is unlikely that this will ever reach the level you want, and it makes no difference what you or I think. There is a level of evidence that has to be met, and it hasn't yet.
 
Attempting to paint honor on this administration would cause that.

Yeah. That's another tell. You can tell how deep the wound by how outlandish the reaction.
 
Many of us were when you guys were not. But, the fact is that it is unlikely that this will ever reach the level you want, and it makes no difference what you or I think. There is a level of evidence that has to be met, and it hasn't yet.

We'll see soon enough.

Issa Subpoenas Kerry To Testify On Benghazi

I wonder if he'll plead the fifth like Lois Lerner.
 
No, American. The blatant arrogance belongs to those who have been passionately screaming "Benghazi" for political points the last few years, yet don't give one flying **** about those who died.

For political points?

OK. So you can swear under oath that no one in the entire operation did anything wrong? You have security in the assumed knowledge that none of the politicos in this ghastly assassination were in any way out of line, that the investigation into the deaths of four of your countrymen is a purely Republican witch hunt with absolutely no basis in fact...you know all this as an absolute...

And yet the guy in charge used a lie for purely partisan if not personal purposes during an election, insisting for over two weeks it was a spontaneous demonstration when it has been made clear both he and Hillary knew the truth and likely a lot more...a president who also blatantly lied in what would be advertising fraud in the private sector....and you say it is the REPUBLICANS playing partisan politics.

Excuse me, but it is blatantly obvious from this distant vantage point that the real partisans are those who chime in on every post, after each new revelation comes shatteringly obvious with the tired old, thread bare bleat of Jay, Bagdad Bob, Carney and it's OLD NEWS.


It is not only lame, vacuous and obvious, but boring. The Obamalemmings have been spewing this garbage with trolling posts for a year and a half, and as each getsb laughed at another little bit of evidence surfaces.

I was a reporter during Watergate. Obama's lemmings have been the epitome of Nixon's defenders since the beginning, more vicious, but less informed...nonetheless the more we see it, the more we become convinced there is a lot of **** in there...

"DUDE, it was over two years ago.." is beyond arrogant and disrespectful, but shows that likely everyone in this has something to hide.
 
Can we move this Benghazi stuff out of Breaking News? It's certainly not breaking by any mainstream source.
 
Can we move this Benghazi stuff out of Breaking News? It's certainly not breaking by any mainstream source.


LOL !

Yes, let the Obama apologist partisan sheep define the relevance of the News.

What ? Are getting tired of washing your hands after every post ?
 
Can we move this Benghazi stuff out of Breaking News? It's certainly not breaking by any mainstream source.

Which are you....the president of NBC, ABC, CBS, or CNN? Gotta be one of them.
 
We'll see soon enough.

Issa Subpoenas Kerry To Testify On Benghazi

I wonder if he'll plead the fifth like Lois Lerner.

We will see. If the evidence is there, prosecute. No objection from me. But to date, it's just been noise with no substance. And really, all you had was a couple of weeks of a false narrative. The trouble came long before that, and has already been admitted to by Hillary (that errors were made). So, its not like there is a criminal act. At worse, there's merely a false narrative that was unsuccessfully portrayed.
 
Many of us were when you guys were not. But, the fact is that it is unlikely that this will ever reach the level you want, and it makes no difference what you or I think. There is a level of evidence that has to be met, and it hasn't yet.

People said the same about Watergate. It took a few years before that all became public too.
 
We will see. If the evidence is there, prosecute. No objection from me. But to date, it's just been noise with no substance. And really, all you had was a couple of weeks of a false narrative. The trouble came long before that, and has already been admitted to by Hillary (that errors were made). So, its not like there is a criminal act. At worse, there's merely a false narrative that was unsuccessfully portrayed.

The e-mails show that Hillary and administration knew almost immediately that this was a terrorist attack, but weeks before the election, they concocted a lie to blame it all on a protest over an obscure internet video.

The maker of that video was jailed over this lie. THAT is just what Clintons do.

And that is the leader in the clubhouse to be the next Democratic nominee for president.
 
We will see. If the evidence is there, prosecute. No objection from me. But to date, it's just been noise with no substance. And really, all you had was a couple of weeks of a false narrative. The trouble came long before that, and has already been admitted to by Hillary (that errors were made). So, its not like there is a criminal act. At worse, there's merely a false narrative that was unsuccessfully portrayed.

It's not certain at all there hasn't been a criminal act, or even a few, by higher level members of Obama's 2012 campaign or by higher level members of the WH staff. Bear in mind that the released emails are just a portion of the documents Judicial Watch requested and has obtained. So it's a maybe or maybe not situation. Nobody with any sense is after Obama. He's the gift that keeps on giving at this point regarding 2014.
 
i truly am not that concerned about him [osama bin laden]


yea, tell us some more

Okay ...

"We haven't heard much from him. And I wouldn't necessarily say he's at the center of any command structure. And, again, I don't know where he is," Bush said during the 2002 news conference. "I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him. I know he is on the run.

"I was concerned about him when he had taken over a country," Bush continued. "I was concerned about the fact that he was basically running Afghanistan and calling the shots for the Taliban. But once we set out the policy and started executing the plan, he became -- we shoved him out more and more on the margins. He has no place to train his Al Qaeda killers anymore."

There.
 


yea, tell us some more


So your defense of a President not caring enough to lift a finger to help a consulate under siege is to show a video of a president who wasn't afraid of the enemy?
 
People said the same about Watergate. It took a few years before that all became public too.

No, there was a break in there.
 
The e-mails show that Hillary and administration knew almost immediately that this was a terrorist attack, but weeks before the election, they concocted a lie to blame it all on a protest over an obscure internet video.

The maker of that video was jailed over this lie. THAT is just what Clintons do.

And that is the leader in the clubhouse to be the next Democratic nominee for president.

And Hillary was the one who corrected it, and relatively soon.

But giving the wrong cause after the fact may not be criminal. Wrong. Despicable. Maybe. but not criminal. So, there's not much of anything that can be done.
 
It's not certain at all there hasn't been a criminal act, or even a few, by higher level members of Obama's 2012 campaign or by higher level members of the WH staff. Bear in mind that the released emails are just a portion of the documents Judicial Watch requested and has obtained. So it's a maybe or maybe not situation. Nobody with any sense is after Obama. He's the gift that keeps on giving at this point regarding 2014.

Perhaps, but the key is there isn't anything criminal to date. Right?
 
No, American. The blatant arrogance belongs to those who have been passionately screaming "Benghazi" for political points the last few years, yet don't give one flying **** about those who died.

So anyone demanding answers is only doing so for "political points"? Lies like that don't let Obama off the hook. Minimizing the lives of dead Americans is very low brow. You should be ashamed.
 
Many of us were when you guys were not. But, the fact is that it is unlikely that this will ever reach the level you want, and it makes no difference what you or I think. There is a level of evidence that has to be met, and it hasn't yet.

Yet, but the lies are starting to fall apart.
 
Back
Top Bottom