Page 10 of 59 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 584

Thread: Benghazi emails suggest White House aide involved in prepping Rice for ‘video [W:212]

  1. #91
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    SW Virginia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:17 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    18,265

    Re: Benghazi emails suggest White House aide involved in prepping Rice for ‘video’ ex

    Quote Originally Posted by Carleen View Post
    When you shed light on how the WH was involved, from a reliable source.
    Rhodes, Carney and Pfeiffer are sources you would probably consider reliable, and it's right there in the email in black and white - from the WH with their names on it. Rhodes is now the Director of Communications at the WH. For a liberal, that's reliable. They've damned themselves.

  2. #92
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Benghazi emails suggest White House aide involved in prepping Rice for ‘video’ ex

    Quote Originally Posted by eohrnberger View Post

    Its not and some should go back and read what we have up on Benghazi here......how many times do we have to put up what validates the BS that they lied over? Each time some come back trying to explain out what they don't have and what they can't get around.

  3. #93
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    SW Virginia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:17 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    18,265

    Re: Benghazi emails suggest White House aide involved in prepping Rice for ‘video’ ex

    Quote Originally Posted by JasperL View Post
    I responded to a direct assertion - I'll quote you again: "but were actively coaching Rice not to share what they knew."

    Where is that in the email?

    You've asserted again and again the attack was NOT in response to the video, but something else you won't or can't name, and despite other protests in the region...about the video. And you've asserted without proof they KNEW all this within days of the attack, despite interviews by BBC of protesters claiming it was....about the video, and before the actual investigation had even begun. But besides all this, what at that point did they KNOW? Did they know WHO? No, but they knew WHY? And if so, please tell me why they attacked the consulate? Was it terrorism, or was it in response to CIA spook activities run out of that consulate? And when did they KNOW this? When did you know this?




    You want MORE investigation about very early talking points? Give me a break. This is why most of the rest of us moved on long ago from Benghazi. The entire scandal has been reduced to very early explanations by the WH about WHY some terrorists, unknown at that time, attacked us. These talking points were signed off on by everyone involved, CIA, FBI, State and WH. But apparently this is a scandal bigger than Iran Contra and Watergate times 10!



    Nothing to like or dislike - I just don't see in them "hide what we KNOW." I'm waiting on you telling me what we did know, and where they told her to hide those few things we did.
    Read this: Video: Besieged Carney Claims Newly-Released WH Emails...Weren't About Benghazi - Guy Benson

  4. #94
    Student
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    248

    Re: Benghazi emails suggest White House aide involved in prepping Rice for ‘video’ ex

    this horse AINT dead, until Hilary's serving the proper amount of prison time (ie, 10 life sentences) for all her crimes.

  5. #95
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    SW Virginia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:17 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    18,265

    Re: Benghazi emails suggest White House aide involved in prepping Rice for ‘video’ ex

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Its not and some should go back and read what we have up on Benghazi here......how many times do we have to put up what validates the BS that they lied over? Each time some come back trying to explain out what they don't have and what they can't get around.
    Pretty soon it's going to be, "La, la, la, la, la - I can't hear you." from the left.

  6. #96
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Benghazi emails suggest White House aide involved in prepping Rice for ‘video’ ex

    Yep, plus we have the time he has said anything.

    Sept. 12, 4:09 p.m.: At a press briefing en route to Las Vegas, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney is asked, “Does the White House believe that the attack in Benghazi was planned and premeditated?” He responds, “It’s too early for us to make that judgment. I think — I know that this is being investigated, and we’re working with the Libyan government to investigate the incident. So I would not want to speculate on that at this time.”.....snip~

  7. #97
    Guru
    Carleen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:24 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    3,617

    Re: Benghazi emails suggest White House aide involved in prepping Rice for ‘video’ ex

    Quote Originally Posted by eohrnberger View Post
    I said reliable.
    "Being President doesn't change who you are, it reveals who you are"

  8. #98
    Guru
    Carleen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:24 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    3,617

    Re: Benghazi emails suggest White House aide involved in prepping Rice for ‘video’ ex

    Quote Originally Posted by humbolt View Post
    Rhodes, Carney and Pfeiffer are sources you would probably consider reliable, and it's right there in the email in black and white - from the WH with their names on it. Rhodes is now the Director of Communications at the WH. For a liberal, that's reliable. They've damned themselves.
    Show me
    "Being President doesn't change who you are, it reveals who you are"

  9. #99
    Sage

    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Tennessee
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:55 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    21,810

    Re: Benghazi emails suggest White House aide involved in prepping Rice for ‘video’ ex

    Oh, great, an editorial from IBD. Got anything by NRO or Redstate? And can I link to something written by Media Matters in response?

    I did read it - it's a recap of the editing process that involved CIA, State, FBI and the WH. What was I supposed to learn from that recap.

    Can YOU tell me when we KNEW why the consulate was attacked and therefore when you knew it wasn't about the videos, but about something else no one will tell me?

  10. #100
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Last Seen
    07-21-14 @ 07:51 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    614

    Re: Benghazi emails suggest White House aide involved in prepping Rice for ‘video’ ex

    Quote Originally Posted by JasperL View Post
    I responded to a direct assertion - I'll quote you again: "but were actively coaching Rice not to share what they knew."

    Where is that in the email?

    You've asserted again and again the attack was NOT in response to the video, but something else you won't or can't name, and despite other protests in the region...about the video. And you've asserted without proof they KNEW all this within days of the attack, despite interviews by BBC of protesters claiming it was....about the video, and before the actual investigation had even begun. But besides all this, what at that point did they KNOW? Did they know WHO? No, but they knew WHY? And if so, please tell me why they attacked the consulate? Was it terrorism, or was it in response to CIA spook activities run out of that consulate? And when did they KNOW this? When did you know this?




    You want MORE investigation about very early talking points? Give me a break. This is why most of the rest of us moved on long ago from Benghazi. The entire scandal has been reduced to very early explanations by the WH about WHY some terrorists, unknown at that time, attacked us. These talking points were signed off on by everyone involved, CIA, FBI, State and WH. But apparently this is a scandal bigger than Iran Contra and Watergate times 10!



    Nothing to like or dislike - I just don't see in them "hide what we KNOW." I'm waiting on you telling me what we did know, and where they told her to hide those few things we did.
    The White House knew the attack was not a reaction to a video or a protest and that has been testified to several times. Furthermore the White House knew there had been no protest going on about ANYTHING at the embassy prior to the attack. Benghazi Timeline

    So again, your regurgitation of the contortions in the story that have come from the White House are your apparently wishful speculation. As well as ignoring and dismissing everything that contradicts the contortions. As regards what Rhodes in his job at the White House was directing Rice to say where is that in the email you STILL are claiming does not say what I'm referring to? You must mean aside from the subject of the email? About the PREP call made to Rice? "RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 pm ET." As you insinuated to another poster when you called him out, but before you opted not to backup your "call out" with anything, it is about credibility. At this point you have now thrice proven to me you have none. You do appear to have faith in the administration but then these repeated knee jerk dismissals of yours are pretty explanatory. You keep leaping without thinking about what I said and what is in the emails that you clearly somehow managed to either miss or just did not bother to actually read.

    Seems you and Jay Carney have something in common, neither of you can discern what the emails are about or contain in them. The poor man was besieged and then tried something really creative, he claimed these newly released WH emails...weren't even about Benghazi!



    In any case what I'd like to see has already been stated. Trying to not too creatively change what I did say to I wanted investigation of every talking point. If I did it certainly would not be by the (any) administration investigating itself.
    Last edited by Filthy McNasty; 04-30-14 at 07:25 PM.

Page 10 of 59 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •