Re: Cliven Bundy stands by racially charged comments, ‘That’s exactly what I said’
Your logic is faulty.
If anyone is being dishonest here, it's you.
Wrong.
Your comment lacks logic.
As previously shown.
Words of concern that are not of disparagement, hatred or intolerance, are words of concern that are not of disparagement, hatred or intolerance.
You have to take them out of context to suggest they are of disparagement. Unintentional or otherwise.
He was not disparaging, unintentionally or otherwise.
He was not unwittingly racist.
And in context, there were no faulty generalizations or assumptions.
To even suggest such, you have to take what he said out of context.
It is dishonest to say otherwise.
You have a really tough time understanding how to argue your case.
Apparently it is you that keeps failing.
you say that Bundy's comments couldn't be racist because they were "words of concern."
His words were of concern, not disparagement, hatred or intolerance.
Anybody that says they were racist is wrong.
That is what you apparently do not understand.
Then I point out that words of concern can still be incredibly racist, and you abandon ship.
Wrong.
If anybody abandoned ship, it was you when you went overboard and left your absurd words behind.
They were not even relevant to this case or even close to what he said.
you should really stop copying and pasting the same argument over and over again if you can't defend it.
The words defend themselves.
Words of concern that are not of disparagement, hatred or intolerance, are words of concern that are not of disparagement, hatred or intolerance.
You have to take them out of context to suggest they are of disparagement. Unintentional or otherwise.
He was not disparaging, unintentionally or otherwise.
He was not unwittingly racist.
And in context, there were no faulty generalizations or assumptions.
To even suggest such, you have to take what he said out of context.
It
is dishonest to say otherwise.
I think it's funny that you never even thought your argument through before making it over and over and over again, but I feel a little embarrassed for you.
What is funny is you making false assertions and failing to support them.
And I am not embarrassed for you making your false claims. I am saddened by it.
Now as to your assertion that Bundy was only talking about black people on welfare.
And he was, it became clear as soon as he said "government houses" and was even more clear when he said "on government subsidy". Those were the "negros" he was speaking about in context.
Yet we have folks that do not understand that, and want to take what he said out of context to say he was speaking about all.
Well they are just wrong.
He was specifically speaking of those on welfare.
Refusal to see that is willful blindness.
Now, he starts this diatribe with: "Where is our colored brother?"
So you're thinking that somebody literally has a colored brother? He isn't talking about all black Americans, like... like it's obvious he's talking about? He's just talking about one person?
:doh
Your inability to discern what has been said in context, has already been noted.
And now you show that you can not even distinguish between what he says at one point, and what he says at another.
Pretty sad. :doh
All you are doing is squawking nonsense.
Dude go take a vacation. You're only digging a deeper and deeper hole for yourself.
You clearly are the one who has dug a hole, and I would recommend you take your vacation there.