Moot
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2006
- Messages
- 40,549
- Reaction score
- 15,452
- Location
- Utah
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Re: Bundy questioned whether blacks were better off as slaves
So you butted in to a discussion that had nothing to do with you and failed to read the post I was responding to. Iow, you took what I said out of context and are now trying to make me defend your strawman. Got it.What I am talking about is the topic, which I addressed with you way back in #504 and you ignored that. Then in #507 I pointed out that VanceMack (or any other poster for that matter) really does not have to prove to you that there are other ways BLM could have handled this situation. It is just a fact that you were ignorant of. You were told this by several posters as well and the information has been covered extensively in the press. I dared ask why are you were unaware and unable to follow any of it at all? Or did it just have to be how VanceMack would himself have handled it?
...and you still don't get it.My question remains Why? What does that matter in any way whatsoever? Because you have personal thing going with VanceMack? Apparently the answer is you have decided that asking such obvious questions is somehow trying to insult you, harass you, violate the rules of the forum. It's not addressing the topic and whatever else I guess you can gin up. So in that vein, yeah I know that we can see who edits posts. I was referring to your decision to delete your post about me supposedly violating the rules (again) but then my reply to it had already been posted. I was talking about your deletion of a whole post, not your editing existing ones. Which is perfectly obvious too, good try but sloppy and clumsy as all hell.
Well, "if you can't take the heat....."This has been about Bundy and how the BLM chose to operate in his case all along. Even while you tried to gin this all into me harassing you, insulting you and breaking the rules/trying to act like a moderator and other not so clever diversions. So I'm glad to see you are finally ready to get back on topic!