Page 9 of 21 FirstFirst ... 789101119 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 210

Thread: Bundy's 'ancestral rights' come under scrutiny

  1. #81
    Sage
    clownboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    08-17-16 @ 10:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    26,087

    Re: Bundy's 'ancestral rights' come under scrutiny

    Quote Originally Posted by CRUE CAB View Post
    So you would just sell property that has been in your family since the 1800s. Versus fight to keep it and stand strong.
    Well no, I'd scale back and tailor my operations to the 150 acres of land I own (speaking as a Bundy).

  2. #82
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    IL
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:20 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    36,837

    Re: Bundy's 'ancestral rights' come under scrutiny

    Quote Originally Posted by CRUE CAB View Post
    He feels the charges are unconstitutional based on its a state rights issue and not a fed issue.
    If it's a state's rights issue as you say, Bundy should pay state's fees, $12 a head in Nevada, compared to $1.35 a head to the BLM .
    Physics is Phun

  3. #83
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    IL
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:20 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    36,837

    Re: Bundy's 'ancestral rights' come under scrutiny

    Along with Federal and State and Municipal Government Pensions, Health Care, and other gubmit bennies .
    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    Too bad those who are so outraged aren't as outraged at welfare freeloaders, or workmans comp freeloaders, or healthcare freeloaders....
    Physics is Phun

  4. #84
    Sage
    jamesrage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A place where common sense exists
    Last Seen
    12-10-17 @ 09:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    31,067

    Re: Bundy's 'ancestral rights' come under scrutiny

    Quote Originally Posted by CRUE CAB View Post
    So you would just sell property that has been in your family since the 1800s. Versus fight to keep it and stand strong.

    Seeing how he has been using public lands to graze his cattle on the property he has is insufficient in raising cattle.How long he alleges that his family had the property for is irrelevant. When businesses expand they often move if the property is insufficient, they just do not build onto their neighbors without permission.
    "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear"

    Cicero Marcus Tullius

  5. #85
    The Dude
    Kobie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Western NY
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:33 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    42,908

    Re: Bundy's 'ancestral rights' come under scrutiny

    By the way, Mr. Bundy, if you're going to try to claim "ancestral" rights, then there's at least two ethnic groups I can think of whose "ancestral rights" go back a hell of a lot farther than yours, paleface.
    Freedom of speech is not freedom from criticism.

  6. #86
    Bat Chain Puller
    beefheart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    The burning sands of the desert southwest.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:51 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    19,369

    Re: Bundy's 'ancestral rights' come under scrutiny

    Quote Originally Posted by NIMBY View Post
    If it's a state's rights issue as you say, Bundy should pay state's fees, $12 a head in Nevada, compared to $1.35 a head to the BLM .
    No, then he would claim that the state doesn't exist and he is a freeman, and all that nonsense that tax cheating deadbeats say.

    I'm amazed that anyone still backs this welfare queen thief.
    "Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana

  7. #87
    Bat Chain Puller
    beefheart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    The burning sands of the desert southwest.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:51 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    19,369

    Re: Bundy's 'ancestral rights' come under scrutiny

    Quote Originally Posted by mac View Post
    It's not a US Govt flag.
    Really?

    Sometimes it is better not to reply, than to make a reply that is that stupid.
    "Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana

  8. #88
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    IL
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:20 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    36,837

    Re: Bundy's 'ancestral rights' come under scrutiny

    My leaving time for Nevada is getting closer.
    I haven't gone the I-44 to I-40 connection for a while.
    Maybe a trip up to Sandia Peak to overlook Albuquerque on the way back.
    Quote Originally Posted by beefheart View Post
    No, then he would claim that the state doesn't exist and he is a freeman, and all that nonsense that tax cheating deadbeats say.
    I'm amazed that anyone still backs this welfare queen thief.
    The idea of "ancestral" rights seems to be getting pretty hot.
    Especially in Native lands in SD and NE in the way of eminent domain and the KXL.
    Kobie's correct about the Native Indians having long-time rights in NV, but we all saw how that went in the 19th century .
    Physics is Phun

  9. #89
    Sage
    reinoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Out West
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:15 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    16,116
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Bundy's 'ancestral rights' come under scrutiny

    Quote Originally Posted by CRUE CAB View Post
    If I raised your rent, based on a lie. How would you react?
    If you're the landlord you can raise the rent for any reason you want in most states provided sufficient notice was given. If I don't like paying the rent I can move.
    Trump Attacked A Syrian Airfield. Trump will be a one-term president.

  10. #90
    Sage
    reinoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Out West
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:15 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    16,116
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Bundy's 'ancestral rights' come under scrutiny

    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    Too bad those who are so outraged aren't as outraged at welfare freeloaders, or workmans comp freeloaders, or healthcare freeloaders....
    Most of those freeloaders aren't using militias to defend their right to freeload.
    Trump Attacked A Syrian Airfield. Trump will be a one-term president.

Page 9 of 21 FirstFirst ... 789101119 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •