• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’[W:254:298:850,989]

Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

On this side of that bridge, there's a barricade to keep people on this side of that bridge (Bundy's militia).

In the background, beyond the people lined up at the barricade are the feds (white vehicles)

But you're not going to convince the Bundy supporters that the man on the bridge was aiming his rifle downrange towards the federal officers, your fingers will get tired first.

View attachment 67165309

Does his gun have a curve at the end of it? Because he's pointing straight, and the federal officers are to the left behind the white vehicles that are there.

I though they were waiving guns in the faces of the feds?

And where is the proof that anyone tossed his child in front of an armed guard?
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

I guess we'll have to wait until the man's trial to see who was right, you or me. I can clearly see LEO on the far side of that crowd.

You can't see what is directly across from the end of his rifle. Fact.

The "LEO" are to his left. And very very far away.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

I can't see the federal official on the other side of his gun. Where is this person? Let's see him.

What do you suppose he had in his sights ?? A jack rabbit?
Do you think Eric came all the way from Idaho to aim his rifle at a jack rabbit?
Play your silly little game of denial and coyness...Everyone knows what he was doing and at whom he was aiming his rifle and why.
You are becoming as irrelevant to this debate as Oakham.
let's hear you defend Bundy's actions and his refusal to "recognize the US government as even existing".
You have not chosen your heroes wisely.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Not better, as there is no image of what is on the right side of the picture.

Try again.

The image I recently posted was taken from the overpass where the militia lay in the prone position, you can see the militia and Bundy supporters on this side of the barricade, note the federal officers in the distance with the white vehicles.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

What do you suppose he had in his sights ?? A jack rabbit?
Do you think Eric came all the way from Idaho to aim his rifle at a jack rabbit?
Play your silly little game of denial and coyness...Everyone knows what he was doing and at whom he was aiming his rifle and why.
You are becoming as irrelevant to this debate as Oakham.
let's hear you defend Bundy's actions and his refusal to "recognize the US government as even existing".
You have not chosen your heroes wisely.

I don't KNOW what he had in his sights - and guess what? Neither do you.

My "heroes"? Now that's comical. For the record, I think Bundy should pay the money, and I think he should pay the back owed money. What I can't stand are the lies being posted on here, and the fact that you all are repeating left wing talking points and not a single one of you has seen a shred of evidence to support those talking points.

Keep fighting the good fight, and carrying water for your liberal - what are they again? I know. Your liberal heroes.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

The image I recently posted was taken from the overpass where the militia lay in the prone position, you can see the militia and Bundy supporters on this side of the barricade, note the federal officers in the distance with the white vehicles.

Why bother? The conservatives on this thread have shown a distinct willingness to deny any and all facts that don't fit their chosen narrative. That's not likely to stop anytime soon.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Why bother? The conservatives on this thread have shown a distinct willingness to deny any and all facts that don't fit their chosen narrative. That's not likely to stop anytime soon.

And the liberals on this thread have shown an interest in repeating something that others tell them are "facts", when in fact, there is no evidence of these claims in spite of the fact that there were hundreds of people there with cameras and video recorders.

But keep on repeating what you're told, Kobie.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

And where are the pictures of all of these men who were using their children as shields? They certainly aren't in that shot of that one person you all keep posting, or did I miss his child in that picture too? Is the child in front of the law enforcement guy that we can't see either?
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

And the liberals on this thread have shown an interest in repeating something that others tell them are "facts", when in fact, there is no evidence of these claims in spite of the fact that there were hundreds of people there with cameras and video recorders.

But keep on repeating what you're told, Kobie.

There's no evidence that the strategy was to use women as human shields?
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

There's no evidence that the strategy was to use women as human shields?

Where are the pictures of these women being dragged into that position, or being tossed in front of the men? Where are the interviews with the women who were forced to do this against their wills?

And where are the pictures of the children who were being used as shields?
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

FOX has the tape, which you have seen, of the militiaman "threatening to use women and children" as shields when the shooting starts.
He directly states he wants all the World to see BLM officers gunning down his women and children.
These are the people you are defending .
And where are the pictures of all of these men who were using their children as shields? They certainly aren't in that shot of that one person you all keep posting, or did I miss his child in that picture too? Is the child in front of the law enforcement guy that we can't see either?
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

You can't see what is directly across from the end of his rifle. Fact.

The "LEO" are to his left. And very very far away.

Dawn-America-Armed-Militias_021145990077.jpg


Not that far away....actually.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

So you admit you can't see a law enforcement person, you just "think" there is one there.

But you can't produce another angle to verify it, I assume?

For all I know, Sean Connery is standing over there. Or more armed friends of Bundy. Or Bundy himself. Or a damn oil tanker. The fact is, you don't know what's over there either!

The more I read some posts on this thread, the more I think there are some posters who are doing nothing more than trolling

Looking back at the overpass where the sniper is hiding
bundy standoff.jpg

photo taken from a position left of the sniper's place on the overpass
bundy-30.jpg

from a website that supports Bundy
blmvssupporters-300x215.jpg
Pedestrians and horseback riders confront the BLM as ranchers advanced to have the cattle released

Showing both overpasses, traffic only on left because Bundy supporters have blocked south-bound lanes of I-5
web1_RANGEWAR_041214jb_04_12.jpg
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

The more I read some posts on this thread, the more I think there are some posters who are doing nothing more than trolling

Looking back at the overpass where the sniper is hiding
View attachment 67165313

photo taken from a position left of the sniper's place on the overpass
View attachment 67165312

from a website that supports Bundy
View attachment 67165314
Pedestrians and horseback riders confront the BLM as ranchers advanced to have the cattle released

Showing both overpasses, traffic only on left because Bundy supporters have blocked south-bound lanes of I-5
View attachment 67165315

Your pictures all prove my point. And I don't suspect you meant to do it.

Where are the children being used as shields that you all keep claiming was happening?
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

He was aiming at the melons Bundy was growing. :rolleyes:

Are you objecting to aiming at melons? :mrgreen:;)
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Dawn-America-Armed-Militias_021145990077.jpg


Not that far away....actually.

Keep on fighting away. And I'll keep pointing out that none of you have shown any evidence of children being used as shields, and no evidence of that man pointing a gun in the face of law enforcement, and you all keep posting the same pictures of the same man. I thought this was a mad militia? Lots of people pointing these guns? All these men tossing their kids in front of loaded weapons.

And all I keep seeing are pictures of the same man.

Pathetic.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

FOX has the tape, which you have seen, of the militiaman "threatening to use women and children" as shields when the shooting starts.
He directly states he wants all the World to see BLM officers gunning down his women and children.
These are the people you are defending .

Ah, so it was a THREAT to do it? So in other words, it never happened, did it?

But you all keep saying it did.

I could threaten to poison my husband's food tonight. If I don't do it, there ain't nothing there.

I'm not defending anyone. I'm pointing out what a bunch of liars you all are. You are repeating talking points, and you all lose your damn marbles when the right does it.

Pathetic.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Keep on fighting away. And I'll keep pointing out that none of you have shown any evidence of children being used as shields, and no evidence of that man pointing a gun in the face of law enforcement, and you all keep posting the same pictures of the same man. I thought this was a mad militia? Lots of people pointing these guns? All these men tossing their kids in front of loaded weapons.

And all I keep seeing are pictures of the same man.

Pathetic.

I, for one, never said they planned on using children as shields. So cram the "you all" talk.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Keep on fighting away. And I'll keep pointing out that none of you have shown any evidence of children being used as shields, and no evidence of that man pointing a gun in the face of law enforcement, and you all keep posting the same pictures of the same man. I thought this was a mad militia? Lots of people pointing these guns? All these men tossing their kids in front of loaded weapons.

And all I keep seeing are pictures of the same man.

Pathetic.
I wasn't countering or supporting the children comment, I am countering your claim that:

You can't see what is directly across from the end of his rifle. Fact.


It is very clear he is aiming at LEO........ unless you want to argue he is pointing his rifle at his own side.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Ah, so it was a THREAT to do it? So in other words, it never happened, did it?

But you all keep saying it did.

I could threaten to poison my husband's food tonight. If I don't do it, there ain't nothing there.

I'm not defending anyone. I'm pointing out what a bunch of liars you all are. You are repeating talking points, and you all lose your damn marbles when the right does it.

Pathetic.

How are we lying? On videotape, the sniper guy saying that they were going to use women and children as shields, also on video Sheriff Mack saying they are going to use women as shields. What are you to believe, actual video of 2 of the crazy militia folk saying what they are going to do, or you just dismissing it.

Am I wrong for taking the word ot two people interviewed on TV who said they were going to do that?

Cognitive dissonance, you are soaking in it
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

They are on FOX tape and she can't deal with it.
I, for one, never said they planned on using children as shields. So cram the "you all" talk.
I take anything these extreme terrorists say seriously
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Ah, so it was a THREAT to do it? So in other words, it never happened, did it?
Now you're quibbling over the words the domestic terrorist used.
Words he promised if the BLM officers didn't back off.
You may have taken them a bit more seriously if it happened in your backyard.


I could threaten to poison my husband's food tonight. If I don't do it, there ain't nothing there.
Unrelated to the OP--please stick to the topic.
The militiaman was clearly taped by your FOX with this threat.
The militia man was clearly in sniper position.
He is the very definition of militant right-wing terrorists in the USA today.
I'm not defending anyone. I'm pointing out what a bunch of liars you all are.
You are repeating talking points, and you all lose your damn marbles when the right does it.Pathetic.
You're now down to calling people liars and pathetic and losing their damn marbles.
I'm not allowed to speak this way on a thread with three warnings .
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

How are we lying? On videotape, the sniper guy saying that they were going to use women and children as shields, also on video Sheriff Mack saying they are going to use women as shields. What are you to believe, actual video of 2 of the crazy militia folk saying what they are going to do, or you just dismissing it.

Am I wrong for taking the word ot two people interviewed on TV who said they were going to do that?

Cognitive dissonance, you are soaking in it

So you admit that nobody actually pointed a gun at law enforcement, and you admit that nobody actually used a child or a woman as a shield.

Who lied? Well, here's small sampling:

Buck Ewer, post #862:

The cowardly lawless assholes who put their women, pregnant wives and minor children at the front line of their invented, armed confrontation with law enforcement, will pay the price for their domestic terrorism soon enough.

Buck Ewer, post #885:

Their terrorist tactics using women and children as shields in their armed confrontation with law enforcement

Calamity, post #902:

Armed men hiding behind women and children

Kobie, post #904:

The "same tactic"? Putting women and children out front and then pointing weapons at federal officials?

There's just a couple I found in a matter of seconds.

But thank you for admitting it never happened. Never happened. End of story.
 
Back
Top Bottom