• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’[W:254:298:850,989]

Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

How did it start in the first place, 20 years ago?
Why do you selectively support lawbreakers and freeloaders?

Did all the militia cowards hiding behind the skirts of their women come from Nevada?
Do you support the sniper terrorist in combat position?
Grant said:
Yes, of course. It's the other sides fault.
Click to expand...
Let Bundy pay $12 a head to the state of Nevada instead of $1.35 a head to the USA .
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

NIMBY said:
The reports and clips are easy to Google.
You have chosen not to see the domestic terrorist sniper on the overpass.
America has seen him and your 2nd amendment brand has forever been tarnished .
Click to expand...

How about showing me what he's aiming at.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Buck Ewer said:
The cowards were the ones putting pregnant women in their front lines...
Who the **** brings their pregnant wife to a contrived confrontation but a ****ng coward?????
Click to expand...

They put themselves there.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Unacceptable is Sen. Dean Heller calling the sniper on the overpass a Patriot.
Unacceptable is threatening to put women and children in front of militia cowards, caught on tape by your FOX.
Unacceptable is waiving laws by the militant right-wing when you want to for the last 20 years.
Unacceptable is not seeing this as another Branch Davidian or Oklahoma City .
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

mac said:
How about showing me what he's aiming at.
Click to expand...
Who do you think he was aiming at, one of his own terrorists?
You would need to be in his scope.
How does it feel to be skating on such thin ice to support a domestic terrorist ?
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

TheNextEra said:
Oh you little anarchist you. :roll: Have heard enough now from you to know you shouldn't be taken seriously. Nuff said.
Click to expand...

You seem to be under the impression people take you seriously. Its a debate forum.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

TheNextEra said:
So you think it sets a good precedence that as long as a group is heavily armed, they should get away with what ever they want to and the feds should just back down. THAT'S the precedence YOU want to set by having the feds back down.
Click to expand...

And because the feds backed down it only now makes these yahoo thugs believe they ow need a yardstick for their macho male measuring contest instead of the normal ruler.

It only encourages such open rebellion and lunacy. And some people here seem to only encourage and support it.

It is disgusting and repulsive.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’[W:254:298]

Desperation is quibbling with a picture of a domestic terrorist sniper in combat position.
Despicable is joking about who is aiming at.
This needs to be called domestic terrorism itself, giving aid and comfort to these domestic terrorists .
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

NIMBY said:
Who do you think he was aiming at, one of his own terrorists?
You would need to be in his scope.
How does it feel to be skating on such thin ice to support a domestic terrorist ?
Click to expand...

Show a picture of what that gun is aimed at. Your assumptions count for absolutely zero.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

apdst said:
I oppose tyranny. Does Bundy rightfully owe the money? I don't know and I don't care. I do know that all the government would have had to do was place a lein on Bundy's ranch and everytime he took cows to market, they would have gotten an installment in the delinquent fees.

It didn't cost anyone a GOD DAMN dime for those cows to to eat grass in the desert, so stop with the moocher bull****.
Click to expand...

How often do cattle ranchers take cattle to market? Since you're so knowledgeable about the subject.

But, you've stated you don't care about him owing or not owing money, so what's the point of you writing on the thread subject?

A lien on his cattle? How do you know they already don't have one? Isn't owing grazing fees for as long as he has enough reason? You know, Bundy lost in court? Didn't you?

No matter how you cut it, he is still a moocher, still a deadbeat, compared to other cattle ranchers who are glad to have grazing privileges so reasonably offered. Most ranchers, and other people pay their debts, Bundy does not.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

NIMBY said:
Who do you think he was aiming at, one of his own terrorists?
You would need to be in his scope.
How does it feel to be skating on such thin ice to support a domestic terrorist ?
Click to expand...

Don't know much about geometry, huh? And oh, by the way, there is no scope on that rifle. Don't know much about rifles either, do you?
 
Last edited:
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Here's another angle of the guy with the gun.

What's over those people? How far is it?

WHAT is he pointing at?

The Bundy crisis in Nevada | MSNBC

And what happened to this country using the words "terrorist" or "terrorism" anymore, and moving away from the "politics of fear"? Obviously the people who support Reid's use of the words are interested in keeping the "politics of fear" firmly in place.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

AJiveMan said:
How often do cattle ranchers take cattle to market? Since you're so knowledgeable about the subject.

But, you've stated you don't care about him owing or not owing money, so what's the point of you writing on the thread subject?
A lien on his cattle? How do you know they already don't have one? Isn't owing grazing fees for as long as he has enough reason? You know, Bundy lost in court? Didn't you?

No matter how you cut it, he is still a moocher, still a deadbeat, compared to other cattle ranchers who are glad to have grazing privileges so reasonably offered. Most ranchers, and other people pay their debts, Bundy does not.
Click to expand...

The thread subject is Harry Reid and his use of the words "domestic terrorists", not moochers and cattle.

Actually, the thread subbject isn't about Bundy at all since Reid called his supporters "domestic terrorists".
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

tres borrachos said:
Show a picture of what that gun is aimed at. Your assumptions count for absolutely zero.
Click to expand...

There used to be an old saying back during the Viet nam era. "Study long, study wrong." No one can say what the cross-hairs were on except the person staring down the scope. Heck, he could have been scoping one of those tortoises. Who knows?

If you were a law enforcement officer and saw a guy with a scoped sniper rifle pointed your way, what would you do? Wonder whether or not you were in his cross-hairs? I know what I would do.
And bada-bing... there ya go. Ignition... take off. We would have our own bloody "American Spring" all over some guy with a rifle and a chip on his shoulder and a cop who didn't like guns pointed at him.
 
Last edited:
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

beefheart said:
I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God.[1]
Click to expand...

Well, thanks for this quote...now care to explain why you wasted people's time quoting me then posting something that doesn't answer my question?

I never suggested a domestic individual couldn't be an "enemy" that must be defended against. I inquired to wigged if said enemy should be treated similar to a foreign combatant on foreign soil like he suggested.

That quote sUggests a need to defend the constitution....would air striking an American citizen, not convicted of a crime and thus innocent under the law, on American soil....like wiggin suggests by suggesting we take action against them similar to how we deal with terrorists in Pakistan....be defending the constitution, or violating it.

Is your suggestion that congress can drone strike anyone they deem an enemy of the constitution, since all your provided in response was a pointless quote with no original content other than a bolding of three words?
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Captain America said:
There used to be an old saying back during the Viet nam era. "Study long, study wrong." No one can say what the crosshairs were on except the person staring down the scope. Heck, he could have been scoping one of those tortoises. Who knows.

If you were a law enforcement officer and saw a guy with a scoped sniper rifle pointed your way, what would you do?
Click to expand...

Put a stop to it quickly.

And as much as some keep saying he was pointing that gun at law enforcement, none of them have yet to prove it.

But I still want someone to explain why it's okay for Reid to use those words when it's the "politics of fear" this administration so wanted to avoid. This thread has become about Bundy, cattle, moochers and liens, and no more discussion of that idiot Reid.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Captain America said:
There used to be an old saying back during the Viet nam era. "Study long, study wrong." No one can say what the crosshairs were on except the person staring down the scope. Heck, he could have been scoping one of those tortoises. Who knows.

If you were a law enforcement officer and saw a guy with a scoped sniper rifle pointed your way, what would you do?
Click to expand...

The weapon in question is not scoped and no more a " sniper" rifle than my son's .22
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

mac said:
The weapon in question is not scoped and no more a " sniper" rifle than my son's .22
Click to expand...

I hear ya. But kids have been killed pointing BB guns too.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

tres borrachos said:
Put a stop to it quickly.

And as much as some keep saying he was pointing that gun at law enforcement, none of them have yet to prove it.

But I still want someone to explain why it's okay for Reid to use those words when it's the "politics of fear" this administration so wanted to avoid. This thread has become about Bundy, cattle, moochers and liens, and no more discussion of that idiot Reid.
Click to expand...

Reid is a waste of oxygen. What a quab he is.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

mac said:
The weapon in question is not scoped and no more a " sniper" rifle than my son's .22
Click to expand...

Good catch Mac. I just looked at the pictures (all of them) again, and there is no scope.

So where is the evidence that he's pointing that at law enforcement? I don't see it. And we all know that no law enforcement agent was on the other side of that barrier considering there is nothing there.

Domestic terrorist, my ass.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

So you're good with the image then.
Let's take that the next ones from your team all the way to the election .
mac said:
Don't know much about geometry, huh? And oh, by the way, there is no scope on that rifle. Don't know much about rifles either, do you?
Click to expand...
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

tres borrachos said:
And just who has been killed by "right wing loons" in this situation, Wiggen?
Click to expand...

Nobody, yet. And who had had drones attack them? One begets the other. These clowns running around in the woods playing super patriot will eventually go too far. This may be the time.
 
Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

Wiggen said:
Nobody, yet. And who had had drones attack them? One begets the other. These clowns running around in the woods playing super patriot will eventually go too far. This may be the time.
Click to expand...

So you advocate the use of drones on US citizens? Interesting. That should go over real well with the populace.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom