The threat needs to be undertaken, initiated or planned by someone against someone before law enforcement is involved.
Like McVeigh or in Boston, for example.
There was no danger to human life on the Bundy Ranch ... just a grazing fee violation and someone with a motive of their own set a swarm of heavily armed BLM officers on Bundy.
Bundy wasn't intimidating or coercing anyone and there was no mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping ... expect of cattle by the Government.
But it was within the territorial jurisdiction of the US ... you get that one.
Again, it doesn't come close to domestic terrorism.
But I'll say this much ... Harry Reid appears to be looking to incite violence and by definition he satisfies one of the elements.
"Domestic terrorism" means activities with the following three characteristics:
◾Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;
◾Appear intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or kidnapping; and
◾Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S.