Beyond that, you have no idea how many FOIA orders and lawsuits have been filed to get information on a variety of different subjects. That's not really necessary when the documents are out there already.
You found a video... If it's the one where he's video ing his phone conversation, then no, that's not the same one. It's part of a video from the day of the stand down, and you can hear it in the background audio... I figure it'll be harder to find as newer related videos bury it deeper... it's there though.found your video lol. There isnt any audio, maybe there was but there isnt now. But anyways it is posted by the Alex Jones site. The recording was by a employee of Alex Jones. SO I see why you were reluctant to post a link now. I see no more reason to discuss it.
Whether or not you believe, the blm was threatening to shoot people... Is it really that much of a stretch after the people that they beat up, set dogs on people, tasered them, and tried telling them that they had no free speech?
For the sake of argument let's say those threats were not made... The blm were the aggressors, and those armed people only served as a deterrent.
Believe it that if they were completely unarmed that the blm would have attacked, either lethally or not.
Are you denying that the law that I linked exists?
The guy in the photo below is committing a crime in the state of Nevada. The law actually exists and the photo shows this guy doing exactly what the law prohibits.
No matter how you spin it that is what is going on in that photo.
You did say so, right here:
You *think* he's guilty but your opinion doesn't decide if he's *actually* guilty.
You would do well to learn the diference. Has he been arrested? Has he been charged? I'm sure DP would enjoy a thread on that if he were.