Page 11 of 118 FirstFirst ... 9101112132161111 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 1177

Thread: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’[W:254:298:850,989]

  1. #101
    Sage


    Thoreau72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:14 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    20,295

    Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

    Quote Originally Posted by beefheart View Post
    Really? Setting up sniper positions and saying that they will line up behind the women and shoot at the feds.

    That is beyond crap, that is cowards and fruitcakes wanting to start a war and kill innocent people.

    Get some new heroes...
    As George Washington observed, government is very much like fire. It is a useful tool but a fearsome master.

    Those who trust in the government and see it as beneficent are gullible to the max.

  2. #102
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,830

    Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

    Quote Originally Posted by tres borrachos View Post
    What is the specific law that prohibits inviting posses onto your land? Please cite it.
    Threatening law enforcement with guns.
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  3. #103
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,830

    Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

    Quote Originally Posted by Kal'Stang View Post
    Did one person get shot? Did one person get harmed? No? Then it was peaceful. In case you've forgotten people not only have a right to protest but they also have a right to carry arms. So long as none of the militia men started firing off their guns they are well with in their rights.
    "Officer, I'm going to shoot you if you write me a speeding ticket."

    peaceful resistance?
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  4. #104
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    Threatening law enforcement with guns.
    What constitutes a threat?
    “I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on what’s being proposed here, he’d agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute.” - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


  5. #105
    Kinky
    tres borrachos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    New England
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 03:53 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    39,234

    Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    Threatening law enforcement with guns.
    Of course you have a link to someone saying to the law enforcement "I'm going to shoot you"?

  6. #106
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,830

    Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    What constitutes a threat?
    Being armed and present for the express purpose of preventing law enforcement from doing their jobs.
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  7. #107
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    Being armed and present for the express purpose of preventing law enforcement from doing their jobs.
    Being armed and present is constitutionally protected so that's wrong.... What evidence do you have that proves "express purpose"?
    “I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on what’s being proposed here, he’d agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute.” - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


  8. #108
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,830

    Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

    Quote Originally Posted by tres borrachos View Post
    Of course you have a link to someone saying to the law enforcement "I'm going to shoot you"?
    Which part of "armed confrontation" did you think was legitimate?
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  9. #109
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,830

    Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    Being armed and present is constitutionally protected so that's wrong.... What evidence do you have that proves "express purpose"?
    They had an "armed confrontation" with BLM personnel.
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  10. #110
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Reid calls Bundy supporters ‘domestic terrorists’

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    They had an "armed confrontation" with BLM personnel.
    I'll ask again, what evidence do you have that proves "express purpose"?
    “I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on what’s being proposed here, he’d agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute.” - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


Page 11 of 118 FirstFirst ... 9101112132161111 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •