Page 23 of 50 FirstFirst ... 13212223242533 ... LastLast
Results 221 to 230 of 499

Thread: Armed guards surround Bundy, supporters fear imminent threat[W:208]

  1. #221
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Armed guards surround Bundy, supporters fear imminent threat

    Quote Originally Posted by notquiteright View Post
    Any proof the 'government' wants THAT land for solar power, or just more CON crap to deflect from a long time thief, who as ignored the courts BTW, FINALLY, not suddenly getting the LAW enforced on his arrogant butt.

    "Troops" have been on the border for decades, this admin has been rounding up MORE illegals than the BushII one. You are just slinging crap to avoid the facts about Bundy and his long time law breaking. He wasn't ignored, the court system took time to try and give the putz time to back down and remove his cattle.

    I doubt you have rounded up a single cow in your lifetime much less hundreds at a time... it takes a small 'army' on thousands of acres. Bundy and a few rather rabid self proclaimed militia types have ranted online about this and it would be disgraceful to send civilian wranglers into a hot mess without LE to safeguard them.

    The government banned grazing in 1993, has been to court over it and the final straw was Bundy ignoring a court order to REMOVE his cattle.

    I agree the BLM should have continued the round-up, Bundy is pushing for a violent confrontation. But I can imagine the CON bloggers firing up- but not flocking to the fire fight- calling any confrontation another 'Waco'

    I can't find where an 'administration official' said anything about filling coffins.... where is that???

    Nawww, if a bunch of city takers squatted in a National park, detroying the flora, crapping everywhere, and defied court orders to vacate are you saying you'd tell us you're ok with that..... time for you to be honest....
    It may have been part of the ENN plan prior to June 2013, however it is not now, according to Snopes. That doesn't mean the land isn't being eyed for something else either - that information has yet to be provided.
    I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on whats being proposed here, hed agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute. - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


  2. #222
    Sage
    mak2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Indiana
    Last Seen
    07-08-16 @ 01:58 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,050

    Re: Armed guards surround Bundy, supporters fear imminent threat

    I am sure it can still become a scandal.
    God Bless the Marine Corps.

  3. #223
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Canada, Costa Rica
    Last Seen
    05-16-16 @ 09:45 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    31,645

    Re: Armed guards surround Bundy, supporters fear imminent threat

    Quote Originally Posted by notquiteright View Post
    Shout the Grunt Leader Battle Cry- "FOLLOW ME!" and have at it....
    Do the Feds have an 'exit strategy' this time?

  4. #224
    Sage

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    okla-freakin-homa
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 05:33 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    12,619

    Re: Armed guards surround Bundy, supporters fear imminent threat

    Quote Originally Posted by Ockham View Post
    It may have been part of the ENN plan prior to June 2013, however it is not now, according to Snopes. That doesn't mean the land isn't being eyed for something else either - that information has yet to be provided.
    Keep the CON alive!!!! It MAY have been.... ahhh the loving embrace of 'may have been'!!!!

    Just to be honest, since it was back in 1993 that grazing was prohibited on that land- it should have sat idle for over a decade- shouldn't it be put to some sort of use that GAINS the TAXPAYER something???? I mean as it was one man was ILLEGALLY profiting from that land that belong to all of us. Why is this such a difficult concept for the CON mind to wrap around????

    I see this the same way old abandoned building have squatters illegally camping in them, tearing them up, paying no rent or taxes. IF a company or business sees potential in these old buildings and wants to do something with them... do the ILLEGAL Squatters get to threaten armed violence??? Would the CON 'patriots' flock to the inner city ready to defend the squatters???

    Be honest....

  5. #225
    Sage

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    okla-freakin-homa
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 05:33 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    12,619

    Re: Armed guards surround Bundy, supporters fear imminent threat

    Quote Originally Posted by Grant View Post
    Do the Feds have an 'exit strategy' this time?
    Why should they??? The feds have never lost a 'revolution'. The CON 'patriots' are the ones chanting about a 'second not so civil war'...

    Do the CON 'patriots' have a plan of attack... I mean if they are sooooo sure it is time...

  6. #226
    Resident Martian ;)
    PirateMk1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    California
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:08 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    9,922

    Re: Armed guards surround Bundy, supporters fear imminent threat

    Quote Originally Posted by notquiteright View Post
    Shout the Grunt Leader Battle Cry- "FOLLOW ME!" and have at it....
    You are obviously unaware of sarcasm and humor. Robot.
    Semper Fidelis, Semper Liber.
    I spit at lots of people through my computer screen. Not only does it "teach them a lesson" but it keeps the screen clean and shiny.
    Stolen fair and square from the Capt. Courtesey himself.

  7. #227
    Noblesse oblige
    Ockham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Last Seen
    01-27-17 @ 07:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    23,909
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Armed guards surround Bundy, supporters fear imminent threat

    Quote Originally Posted by notquiteright View Post
    Keep the CON alive!!!! It MAY have been.... ahhh the loving embrace of 'may have been'!!!!
    Snopes didn't provide if it was part of the ENN plan prior to June 2013 when ENN dropped interest. So it's accurate to say it may have been, unless you have evidence it was not. Well.... do you?
    I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on whats being proposed here, hed agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute. - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.


  8. #228
    Sage
    VanceMack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:33 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,662

    Re: Armed guards surround Bundy, supporters fear imminent threat

    Quote Originally Posted by notquiteright View Post
    Any proof the 'government' wants THAT land for solar power, or just more CON crap to deflect from a long time thief, who as ignored the courts BTW, FINALLY, not suddenly getting the LAW enforced on his arrogant butt.

    "Troops" have been on the border for decades, this admin has been rounding up MORE illegals than the BushII one. You are just slinging crap to avoid the facts about Bundy and his long time law breaking. He wasn't ignored, the court system took time to try and give the putz time to back down and remove his cattle.

    I doubt you have rounded up a single cow in your lifetime much less hundreds at a time... it takes a small 'army' on thousands of acres. Bundy and a few rather rabid self proclaimed militia types have ranted online about this and it would be disgraceful to send civilian wranglers into a hot mess without LE to safeguard them.

    The government banned grazing in 1993, has been to court over it and the final straw was Bundy ignoring a court order to REMOVE his cattle.

    I agree the BLM should have continued the round-up, Bundy is pushing for a violent confrontation. But I can imagine the CON bloggers firing up- but not flocking to the fire fight- calling any confrontation another 'Waco'

    I can't find where an 'administration official' said anything about filling coffins.... where is that???

    Nawww, if a bunch of city takers squatted in a National park, detroying the flora, crapping everywhere, and defied court orders to vacate are you saying you'd tell us you're ok with that..... time for you to be honest....
    You will be hard pressed to find ANYWHERE that I have defended Bundy or said they shouldnt act. All I have said is that they should act responsibly. Instead...they allowed a scofflaw cattle rancher to bend them over the corral. Pathetic.

    Ive run cattle. I know a thing or two about it.

  9. #229
    Sage
    VanceMack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:33 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,662

    Re: Armed guards surround Bundy, supporters fear imminent threat

    Quote Originally Posted by notquiteright View Post
    Keep the CON alive!!!! It MAY have been.... ahhh the loving embrace of 'may have been'!!!!

    Just to be honest, since it was back in 1993 that grazing was prohibited on that land- it should have sat idle for over a decade- shouldn't it be put to some sort of use that GAINS the TAXPAYER something???? I mean as it was one man was ILLEGALLY profiting from that land that belong to all of us. Why is this such a difficult concept for the CON mind to wrap around????

    I see this the same way old abandoned building have squatters illegally camping in them, tearing them up, paying no rent or taxes. IF a company or business sees potential in these old buildings and wants to do something with them... do the ILLEGAL Squatters get to threaten armed violence??? Would the CON 'patriots' flock to the inner city ready to defend the squatters???

    Be honest....
    Look how cute and angry you are.

    So tell us...what did it COST the taxpayers to let him graze his cattle there? Now...what did cost the taxpayers to send in the klowns, only to have them slink away?

    Since...you know...you care about the taxpayers so much.

  10. #230
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Canada, Costa Rica
    Last Seen
    05-16-16 @ 09:45 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    31,645

    Re: Armed guards surround Bundy, supporters fear imminent threat

    Quote Originally Posted by notquiteright View Post
    Why should they??? The feds have never lost a 'revolution'.
    Don't you mean "The People"?

    The CON 'patriots' are the ones chanting about a 'second not so civil war'...
    Are they?

    Do the CON 'patriots' have a plan of attack... I mean if they are sooooo sure it is time...
    I have no idea. You seem to be the one familiar with the "CON" (whoever they are) strategy.

Page 23 of 50 FirstFirst ... 13212223242533 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •