Also PLEASE defend your other equally failed strawman and tell me what my "political agenda is" lol i cant wait to read that.
Also thanks for the rest of that filler but it doesnt change the facts. Its just more made up strawmen.
2.) so denying equal and civil rights is not a valid? LMAO great ill tell the the 30+ judges that disagree with you.
WHo mentioned a tax return? i hope you arent claiming thats all legal marriage is because thats worse than the failed states rights argument
3.) they are if it violates rights hence all the court cases that goes against what you just said
4.) wow, you like to just say a lot without actually changing anything.
SOME things in the past had amendments done but not all, sorry, this is more filler and strawmen.
next is no one is pursuing an amendment because its not needed. The rights already exist. Another failed starwman.
I respect rights, period hence why i respect the equal and civil rights winning right now.
5.) BOOM!!!!! and there it is. LMAO
nothing of true value?
ill make a note of that individual equal and civil rights is nothgin of true vale
this is all that is needed to understand where you are coming from, THANK YOU. I actually might add that to my sigs. (Equal rights for gays) nothing of any real value _ DemonOfLIght
Thats disgracefully and the fact that equal rights sickens you make me even more proud that its winning, its very reassuring to read somebody say its has no real value, its lets me know the good guys are winning, those who actually care about their rights AND the rights of their fellow Americans.
6.) LOL do you always deflect this much and make up that many strawman.
the question was very simply, what precedence solely from gay marriage will lend itslef to polygamy. Maybe in your next post you will actually answer instead of dodging it.
7.) another failed deflection
list of strawmen
marriage isnt in the constitution
saying marriage inst just a legal thing
all strawmen and all crap that have not logical merit to the discussion. If one is being intellectually honest they all impact nothing in reality. They address nothgin about the facts and are all false decoys to try and shoot down to give the false premise that your failed arguments achieved something.
they are are as meaningful to this discussion as saying water is wet.
Let me know when you can answer those questions instead of talking around them