I'm not a fan of how the government manages itself or anything else. But I am a fan doing things under the rule of law. The rancher is just plain wrong. If there is a fee for grazing on federal land and he didn't pay it then there is consequence under the law. It doesn't matter who should own the land and it doesn't matter who pays for land management in Nevada. The man is in arrears with his grazing permit payments. He's a deadbeat. If he owed it to a bank, the bank would go to court to get restitution and the court would give it to the bank.