• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Economy adds 192,000 jobs; unemployment rate holds steady at 6.7%

danielpalos said:
Do you even have a clue or a Cause regarding the concept of employment at will?
Click to expand...
Doesn't matter, since we aren't talking about that. And why the **** are you capitalizing Cause?

Nevermind...

You said:
danielpalos said:
It means solving simple poverty through unemployment compensation on an at-will basis.
Click to expand...

We are talking about how you think "solving simple poverty" (what, there's a complex version?) is doable via the method of allowing "unemployment compensation on an at-will basis".

Until you explain what the heck that means, or at the least what you INTENDED it to mean, I will not entertain further points of discussion.
 
The Mark said:
Doesn't matter, since we aren't talking about that. And why the **** are you capitalizing Cause?

Nevermind...

You said:


We are talking about how you think "solving simple poverty" (what, there's a complex version?) is doable via the method of allowing "unemployment compensation on an at-will basis".

Until you explain what the heck that means, or at the least what you INTENDED it to mean, I will not entertain further points of discussion.
Click to expand...

I thought it was self-evident that it was about the concept of employment at will, and Individual Liberty in modern and Capital economic times. Are you a socialist?

It should be as simple as a form of full employment of resources in our Institution of money based markets. Simply correcting for Capitalism's laziness regarding solving structural forms of unemployment for free, merely by using sufficient Socialism, to bail out Capitalism, like usual. The legal and physical infrastructure already exists in our republic and could be better utilized, in order for supply side economics to supply us with better governance at lower cost in any rule-of-law State.

It could be as simple as a form of minimum wage that simply pays labor to pursue other opportunity costs, than have to compete in our markets for labor within our Institution of money based markets if it is not in their best interest.
 
danielpalos said:
I thought it was self-evident that it was about the concept of employment at will, and Individual Liberty in modern and Capital economic times. Are you a socialist?

It should be as simple as a form of full employment of resources in our Institution of money based markets. Simply correcting for Capitalism's laziness regarding solving structural forms of unemployment for free, merely by using sufficient Socialism, to bail out Capitalism, like usual. The legal and physical infrastructure already exists in our republic and could be better utilized, in order for supply side economics to supply us with better governance at lower cost in any rule-of-law State.

It could be as simple as a form of minimum wage that simply pays labor to pursue other opportunity costs, than have to compete in our markets for labor within our Institution of money based markets if it is not in their best interest.
Click to expand...
You've got a very odd definition of "self-evident" in your head, apparently.

Because I know for damn sure I didn't think of ANY part of that after your statement. Hell I'm not even sure you said anything just now. There's a bunch of words strung together, sure, but they don't really fit very well.
 
The Mark said:
You've got a very odd definition of "self-evident" in your head, apparently.

Because I know for damn sure I didn't think of ANY part of that after your statement. Hell I'm not even sure you said anything just now. There's a bunch of words strung together, sure, but they don't really fit very well.
Click to expand...

What part of the concept of employment at will is too difficult for you to understand?

At will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."

Source: At-will employment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Click to expand...
 
danielpalos said:
What part of the concept of employment at will is too difficult for you to understand?
Click to expand...
Nothing.

But you weren't talking about at-will employment. You specifically said "unemployment compensation at-will"...

That's...not even close to the same thing.
 
If there is no Faith in executing those laws as a moral in modern times, how can we seriously confide in the sincerity of Private Persons of wealth claiming to have Faith in morals.
 
danielpalos said:
Institutional denial and disparagement of our enumerated rights must be considered a mitigating circumstance.
Click to expand...

What is wrong with you ???

Seriously, whats your problem ?

Are you trying to sound overly learned and educated than you actually are by repeating the same innane vague rhetoric over and over ?

Why cant you expand on your "solutions " ?

Why cant you quantify ANYTHING ??
 
Fenton said:
What is wrong with you ???

Seriously, whats your problem ?

Are you trying to sound overly learned and educated than you actually are by repeating the same innane vague rhetoric over and over ?

Why cant you expand on your "solutions " ?

Why cant you quantify ANYTHING ??
Click to expand...

How do you quantify the cost of a "stairway to heaven", if it is about morals?
 
Fenton said:
What is wrong with you ???

Seriously, whats your problem ?

Are you trying to sound overly learned and educated than you actually are by repeating the same innane vague rhetoric over and over ?

Why cant you expand on your "solutions " ?

Why cant you quantify ANYTHING ??
Click to expand...

I wonder if this has anything to do with the effects of "medical" marijuana?
 
danielpalos said:
Nope; the abomination of hypocrisy is worse than even a crack addiction, but it isn't illegal, only immoral.
Click to expand...

Doubt seriously if I would ever accept your definition of what is moral and immoral. You don't seem to have any concept of costs and who pays for what. You will one of these days and I hope I am around to see it.
 
Conservative said:
Doubt seriously if I would ever accept your definition of what is moral and immoral. You don't seem to have any concept of costs and who pays for what. You will one of these days and I hope I am around to see it.
Click to expand...

Actually, liberals tend to know the value of our Tax dollars, better than most alleged conservatives; and not only that, we also know what we should be doing with it:

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Click to expand...
 
danielpalos said:
How do you quantify the cost of a "stairway to heaven", if it is about morals?
Click to expand...


SEE ??!!

You repeatedly post in parts of the forum that discuss the economy and you cant quauntify your solutions.

Or how "socialism bails out Capitalism".

Its just nonsense from you.
 
danielpalos said:
Why complain about less fortunate "illegals" when you are unwilling to be "legal" to our own laws as moral and ethic?
Click to expand...
Are you a bot or something?

WTF, how does your response have anything to do with my post?
 
The Mark said:
Are you a bot or something?




WTF, how does your response have anything to do with my post?
Click to expand...

Lol !!

I swear I thought that too Mark
 
danielpalos said:
We could end our exorbitantly expensive, War on Poverty with a welfare-State but not a warfare-State, by merely having enough Faith in executing our own laws, and, not Only that, but the Infrastructure is already in place in our republic as well.

We could be lowering our Tax burden merely by cost shifting from a warfare-State to a welfare-State, like our Founding Fathers said so, in Article 6.
Click to expand...

And tell who fills the void left in the world when we pull out of the leadership role in the world? And you think other more nefarious enemies will just leave us alone?

I think yours is a very naive view.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom