• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Economy adds 192,000 jobs; unemployment rate holds steady at 6.7%

Perhaps, with your evidently broad knowledge and clear leadership skills, you might go into a line of work where you'd be eligible for these million dollar bonuses as well. Or do you have too much integrity for that?

How much does does discovering sublime Truth (value) through argumentation pay?
 
It is about socialism and the right alleging to believe in an Iron Age work ethic of "work or die" in modern Information Age times, where corporate welfare even has paid multi-million dollar bonuses.

What do you do for a living Daniel? Do you work for a business? Or have one of your own?
 
What do you do for a living Daniel? Do you work for a business? Or have one of your own?

Does it really matter? I am not the one advocating an Iron Age work ethic of "work or die" while corporate welfare even pays multi-million dollar bonuses under our form of Capitalism.
 
Does it really matter? I am not the one advocating an Iron Age work ethic of "work or die" while corporate welfare even pays multi-million dollar bonuses under our form of Capitalism.

It's a conversation...Do you work?
 
I do chores. Does it matter? I am not the one advocating an Iron Age work ethic of "work or die" while corporate welfare even pays multi-million dollar bonuses under our form of Capitalism.


You do 'chores'? What? As in at home? with mommy and daddy?
 
Does it matter? I also don't resort to fallacy for my Cause; and, I have a lot of practice doing that.

Look, I wanted to determine what you do, or who you work for to make the point of how you deride Capitalism while engaging in the system yourself, but now that I see you are not an adult in the workforce at any level, a lot of your opinion makes more sense. Get back with me when you mature and we can see how your views change when you have to support yourself.
 
Look, I wanted to determine what you do, or who you work for to make the point of how you deride Capitalism while engaging in the system yourself, but now that I see you are not an adult in the workforce at any level, a lot of your opinion makes more sense. Get back with me when you mature and we can see how your views change when you have to support yourself.

Why do you believe it matters, when I am not the one resorting to fallacy for my Cause, and have plenty of practice, unlike those of your point of view who have only non sequiturs and that form of diversion from the argument, and is usually considered a fallacy.
 
Why do you believe it matters, when I am not the one resorting to fallacy for my Cause, and have plenty of practice, unlike those of your point of view who have only non sequiturs and that form of diversion from the argument, and is usually considered a fallacy.

It matters a lot because of your youth and inexperience of even having to take care of yourself. What you show is total ignorance of the economic system we have in this country and your inability to comprehend basic economics and civics. The grass is always greener on the other side until you get there. Having the govt. as your parent is a poor substitute for teaching you personal responsibility and decision making. History shows socialism a failure and the only viable economic model being capitalism for that allows you to be the best you are capable of being and allows you for individual wealth creation thus less need for the nanny state
 
It matters a lot because of your youth and inexperience of even having to take care of yourself. What you show is total ignorance of the economic system we have in this country and your inability to comprehend basic economics and civics. The grass is always greener on the other side until you get there. Having the govt. as your parent is a poor substitute for teaching you personal responsibility and decision making. History shows socialism a failure and the only viable economic model being capitalism for that allows you to be the best you are capable of being and allows you for individual wealth creation thus less need for the nanny state

Did you know that diversions are usually considered fallacies. Why do you believe we are worse off in our modern Information Age concerning discovering sublime Truth (value) through argumentation?

Solving simple poverty is not a government program, but merely a solution for structural forms of unemployment; full employment of resources in any given market is a function of Government.
 
Did you know that diversions are usually considered fallacies. Why do you believe we are worse off in our modern Information Age concerning discovering sublime Truth (value) through argumentation?

Solving simple poverty is not a government program, but merely a solution for structural forms of unemployment; full employment of resources in any given market is a function of Government.

Explain to me why we have poverty when we have the largest entitlement spending program in the world and have pumped trillions into the LBJ war on poverty? We have a 17.3 trillion dollar debt and spend 250 billion a year on DEBT SERVICE which helps no one as much of that money goes overseas to foreign governments. Instead of holding people responsible for poor choices we subsidize them through taxpayer funded welfare programs. Obama proposed a 3.9 trillion dollar budget and the more govt. spending never solves a social problem yet people like you want to throw more money at the problem, why?
 
Explain to me why we have poverty when we have the largest entitlement spending program in the world and have pumped trillions into the LBJ war on poverty? We have a 17.3 trillion dollar debt and spend 250 billion a year on DEBT SERVICE which helps no one as much of that money goes overseas to foreign governments. Instead of holding people responsible for poor choices we subsidize them through taxpayer funded welfare programs. Obama proposed a 3.9 trillion dollar budget and the more govt. spending never solves a social problem yet people like you want to throw more money at the problem, why?

Because our Founding Fathers did not enumerate a warfare-State, but merely, a welfare-State. One needs "enemies of the State" to perpetuate itself and the other can merely provide for the general Welfare and common Defense.
 
Because our Founding Fathers did not enumerate a warfare-State, but merely, a welfare-State. One needs "enemies of the State" to perpetuate itself and the other can merely provide for the general Welfare and common Defense.

You say so little but use a lot of big words that mean nothing. The Founders did not enumerate a welfare state, they built a nation based upon self reliance and neighbor helping neighbor. Where do you think the money comes from to pay for all these social programs you want?
 
You say so little but use a lot of big words that mean nothing. The Founders did not enumerate a welfare state, they built a nation based upon self reliance and neighbor helping neighbor. Where do you think the money comes from to pay for all these social programs you want?

Providing for the general welfare implies a welfare State, not a warfare State. It really is that simple when you understand the concepts.
 
Providing for the general welfare implies a welfare State, not a warfare State. It really is that simple when you understand the concepts.

That isn't what our Founders stated, it was PROMOTE not provide for the general welfare. Politicians changed the word to provide as a way to retain their power and control all by spending "in the name of compassion" thus isn't isn't a simple concept for people like you to understand. Now answer the question where does the money come from to spend on these social programs? Only someone like you will try to justify a 3.9 trillion dollar budget that has generated over 100 million Americans dependent on Taxpayer assisted welfare.
 
That isn't what our Founders stated, it was PROMOTE not provide for the general welfare. Politicians changed the word to provide as a way to retain their power and control all by spending "in the name of compassion" thus isn't isn't a simple concept for people like you to understand. Now answer the question where does the money come from to spend on these social programs? Only someone like you will try to justify a 3.9 trillion dollar budget that has generated over 100 million Americans dependent on Taxpayer assisted welfare.

Yes, everyone should understand that "promote the general welfare" implies promoting a welfare-State not a warfare-State.
 
Yes, everyone should understand that "promote the general welfare" implies promoting a welfare-State not a warfare-State.

NO, in the private sector economic model of this Country promote means to create the atmosphere for strong economic growth which will handle the social problems in this country and always have. Seems you are looking for attention and I don't have any interest in giving any more to you
 
NO, in the private sector economic model of this Country promote means to create the atmosphere for strong economic growth which will handle the social problems in this country and always have. Seems you are looking for attention and I don't have any interest in giving any more to you

You are still missing the point. There is no false dichotomy in having to choose between a welfare-State and a warfare-State. We are Only to promote the general welfare; not, the common defense.
 
You are still missing the point. There is no false dichotomy in having to choose between a welfare-State and a warfare-State. We are Only to promote the general welfare; not, the common defense.

No, the Federal Govt. has one major role, PROVIDE FOR THE COMMON DEFENSE. Domestic welfare is the responsibility of the individual working within the states and local communities which are closer to the problem. Only liberals want to throw more money to the Federal Govt. and allow a bureaucrat in D.C. to solve a local problem in your community. That is liberal logic
 
You are still missing the point. There is no false dichotomy in having to choose between a welfare-State and a warfare-State. We are Only to promote the general welfare; not, the common defense.

No, the Federal Govt. has one major role, PROVIDE FOR THE COMMON DEFENSE. Domestic welfare is the responsibility of the individual working within the states and local communities which are closer to the problem. Only liberals want to throw more money to the Federal Govt. and allow a bureaucrat in D.C. to solve a local problem in your community. That is liberal logic
 
No, the Federal Govt. has one major role, PROVIDE FOR THE COMMON DEFENSE. Domestic welfare is the responsibility of the individual working within the states and local communities which are closer to the problem. Only liberals want to throw more money to the Federal Govt. and allow a bureaucrat in D.C. to solve a local problem in your community. That is liberal logic

Providing for the general welfare is a power delegated to our federal Congress. It is not qualified as a general power and can be as national as bankruptcy laws.
 
No, the Federal Govt. has one major role, PROVIDE FOR THE COMMON DEFENSE. Domestic welfare is the responsibility of the individual working within the states and local communities which are closer to the problem. Only liberals want to throw more money to the Federal Govt. and allow a bureaucrat in D.C. to solve a local problem in your community. That is liberal logic

There is no power to promote the general warfare nor the common offense.
 
Back
Top Bottom