I am not going to re post the question because if you wanted to answer it in the first place you could have. I know you read it...I take your refusal to address the question as an admission that my premise of the question was right on...
You speak of fallacies, hell you've been committing a fallacy of ambiguity since your first post in this thread...And the fact that when presented with opportunity to actually bring light to your "Cause" you resort to the comfort of pablum that is in reality pamphlet driven drivel and meaningless....I don't know what you think you are accomplishing in here, but when drawn out in the slightest we learn just how silly your ideas are. From flooding the monetary supply without the slightest thought to what that actually does to inflation, to some convoluted idea that increasing government programs like unemployment insurance/compliance, and welfare programs will somehow decrease the size and scope of government...
In fact your rouse of saying you want "more efficient government" has nothing to do with size of government does it? Nor does it have anything to do with making anyone's life better, it is just plain crap that you either read from communist websites and thought sounded smart, or some teacher in your high school thought he could get away with filling your head with instead of World History, or Math...
Look, if you want to discuss the aspects of Socialism that have crept in to this country through over a hundred years of progressive twisting, and lying then we can discuss that, but do me a favor, and just drop the whole pseudo intellectual speak, it doesn't make you look smart, just covering up what you can't answer.
So, unless you can actually speak to the issue that promotes a dialog that allows both of us to understand what the other is talking about, then we are done...I won't waste my time with people that conduct themselves that way...