• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Economy adds 192,000 jobs; unemployment rate holds steady at 6.7%

Full employment of resources is a goal. Simplification is another goal.

We can achieve both, through existing infrastructure.

We could solve simple poverty when due to a simple lack of a simple income that would otherwise, simply, keep people above our poverty thresholds; through unemployment compensation that clears our poverty guidelines, in that simple manner. That is what I mean by simple poverty; it can be solved, simply, with existing legal and physical Infrastructure regarding the concept of employment at will.
 
danielpalos said:
Full employment of resources is a goal. Simplification is another goal.

We can achieve both, through existing infrastructure.

We could solve simple poverty when due to a simple lack of a simple income that would otherwise, simply, keep people above our poverty thresholds; through unemployment compensation that clears our poverty guidelines, in that simple manner. That is what I mean by simple poverty; it can be solved, simply, with existing legal and physical Infrastructure regarding the concept of employment at will.
Click to expand...
You keep posting stuff.

But no one knows what you're trying to say.
 
danielpalos said:
Not at all; one time, i got it in under a paragraph. It is only those of the opposing view who seem to have a problem mustering up enough care to even have a Cause.
Click to expand...
Really?

Well I still have no idea whether I disagree with you or not.
 
danielpalos said:
Full employment of resources is a goal. Simplification is another goal.

We can achieve both, through existing infrastructure.

We could solve simple poverty when due to a simple lack of a simple income that would otherwise, simply, keep people above our poverty thresholds; through unemployment compensation that clears our poverty guidelines, in that simple manner. That is what I mean by simple poverty; it can be solved, simply, with existing legal and physical Infrastructure regarding the concept of employment at will.
Click to expand...

So give the unemployed compensation that exceeds your arbitrary level of "poverty".

Great, encientivize dependence on a unprecedented scale

And pay for this how ?

And what does THAT have to do with "socialism bailing out Capitalism ?"
 
Fenton said:
So give the unemployed compensation that exceeds your arbitrary level of "poverty".

Great, encientivize dependence on a unprecedented scale

And pay for this how ?

And what does THAT have to do with "socialism bailing out Capitalism ?"
Click to expand...

Bailout Capitalism and its laziness regarding full employment can increase the circulation of money in our Institution of money based markets. What private sector could be worse off, with a greater increase in the circulation of money demanding goods and services?

We could pay for Faith in executing a federal Doctrine and State laws regarding employment at will, through general taxes on Firms that employ labor. We could lower our tax burden through simplification.
 
danielpalos said:
Bailout Capitalism and its laziness regarding full employment can increase the circulation of money in our Institution of money based markets. What private sector could be worse off, with a greater increase in the circulation of money demanding goods and services?

We could pay for Faith in executing a federal Doctrine and State laws regarding employment at will, through general taxes on Firms that employ labor. We could lower our tax burden through simplification.
Click to expand...
Platitude time.

Nothing is simple.

No plan survives contact with reality.

Capitalizing words for no apparent Reason causes Confusion, and should Be avoided.
 
The Mark said:
Platitude time.

Nothing is simple.

No plan survives contact with reality.

Capitalizing words for no apparent Reason causes Confusion, and should Be avoided.
Click to expand...

It helps if you understand the concepts.

We could be lowering our Tax burden instead of merely complaining about social spending on the least wealthy.
 
danielpalos said:
It helps if you understand the concepts.

We could be lowering our Tax burden instead of merely complaining about social spending on the least wealthy.
Click to expand...
You keep saying that, but you've never specified which concepts it helps for us to understand.
 
danielpalos said:
It helps if you understand the concepts. You may want to start with the concept and legal doctrine of employment at will
Click to expand...

I came into this thread late, but it seems like you are being asked to define your concept, i.e. simple poverty, by now demanding that everyone understanding the new concept of the legal concept of employment at will.

After defining your simple poverty concept, could you explain how this relates to employment at will?
 
jimbo said:
I came into this thread late, but it seems like you are being asked to define your concept, i.e. simple poverty, by now demanding that everyone understanding the new concept of the legal concept of employment at will.

After defining your simple poverty concept, could you explain how this relates to employment at will?
Click to expand...

Only because the concept of employment at will is simple, and already exists as legal and physical infrastructure in our republic. Full employment of resources is also a concept you should understand.

Solving simple poverty can be as easy as a form of minimum wage that compensates labor for being unemployed, in any of our at-will jurisdictions.
 
danielpalos said:
Only because the concept of employment at will is simple, and already exists as legal and physical infrastructure in our republic. Full employment of resources is also a concept you should understand.

Solving simple poverty can be as easy as a form of minimum wage that compensates labor for being unemployed, in any of our at-will jurisdictions.
Click to expand...

But...

Unemployment already compensates labor for being unemployed. In fact that's one of the complaints some have about it.
 
danielpalos said:
Only because the concept of employment at will is simple,
Click to expand...
It's simple enough, though with every post I become more convinced that you don't actually understand it.

and already exists as legal and physical infrastructure in our republic.
Click to expand...
There is no infrastructure for at will employment, nor could there be. Give an example of your claim. (He won't, of course)

Full employment of resources is also a concept you should understand.
Click to expand...
Since 100% employment of resources is impossible, what level would you consider to be "full?" And which resources? Labor, Capital, land?

Solving simple poverty can be as easy as a form of minimum wage that compensates labor for being unemployed, in any of our at-will jurisdictions.
Click to expand...
You've never answered this before, but why only in at will jurisdictions?
 
pinqy said:
It's simple enough, though with every post I become more convinced that you don't actually understand it.

There is no infrastructure for at will employment, nor could there be. Give an example of your claim. (He won't, of course)

Since 100% employment of resources is impossible, what level would you consider to be "full?" And which resources? Labor, Capital, land?

You've never answered this before, but why only in at will jurisdictions?
Click to expand...

What makes you say that? What is your understanding of that concept?

Yes, the infrastructure already exists in our republic. Why do you believe you understand the issues?

In any case, what excuse could any Person have for staying poor on an at-will basis, if they could no longer claim to in official poverty?
 
danielpalos said:
Sorry; you need to do some of your own research. Otherwise, you only make me realize you don't have a clue or a Cause.

Here is one place to start.

Table A-15. Alternative measures of labor underutilization
Click to expand...
I don't want research, I wanted to know what the hell you were trying to say.

See, that's the problem I'm trying to get at here - your posts aren't communicating what you're trying to say.

And you for some reason keep misunderstanding repeated requests for clarification as (apparently) counterpoints and/or requests for entirely different information.
 
The Mark said:
I don't want research, I wanted to know what the hell you were trying to say.

See, that's the problem I'm trying to get at here - your posts aren't communicating what you're trying to say.

And you for some reason keep misunderstanding repeated requests for clarification as (apparently) counterpoints and/or requests for entirely different information.
Click to expand...

You have to understand the concepts.
 
danielpalos said:
What makes you say that? What is your understanding of that concept?

Yes, the infrastructure already exists in our republic. Why do you believe you understand the issues?

In any case, what excuse could any Person have for staying poor on an at-will basis, if they could no longer claim to in official poverty?
Click to expand...
At will employment is the doctrine, long held in common law, that just as an employee is free to leave employment for any reason, so too an employer can end employment for any reason. Despite your claims of "at will state/jurisdictions" all states are employment at will, though most states have exceptions…usually public policy reasons or recognize implied contracts. Obviously, all states recognize explicit contracts, usually union bargaining, and some federal laws apply, such as EEO and the ADA.

Eligibility for unemployment insurance benefits is in no way connected to at will employment.
 
danielpalos said:
How many Ux numbers are there regarding unemployment numbers.
Click to expand...

Just the U-3. The others are measures of underutilization, especially the U-4 to U-6 as they include people who are not unemployed, and the U-6 includes many employed in the numerator.

Only the U-3 is official, though all 6 are valuable for looking at different aspects of the labor market.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom