It's no different than lying on an application.
Perhaps. But the point is if efforts to strip them arose (eg US Cons amendment) he has a record of supporting them.LGBT rights would not damaged in the least if would have stayed as CEO.
It was an extreme example....or so it seems today. But 40 yrs ago....it would have been dismissed just as you did here...because culturally (sadly) so many people still believed in blacks as 2nd class citizens.
That's why I posted it. Not that I believed you would concur with the KKK example yourself.
LGBT friendly litmus test soon to be a regular part of the employment application.
I'm honestly puzzled by your sense of justice and fairness when it doesn't apply to the position you favor.