One of you will end up here next!
so what if they disapproved. there is always a % that will disapprove of something. they can get over it.
the more businesses stand up and people stand up to them the less rail roading they will do.
the problem is just encourages them and their behavior.
sure trying to stifle and or punish someone for speaking their personal opinion is a clear violation of the 1st amendment.
we are not a thought police state the last time i checked.
A common theme seems to be that if he had never done the action of donating he'd still be CEO, and that's ok. In other words: If he had kept his views to himself, and not had the audacity to expose or support his own views, we'd let him stay.
Oh, isn't that ever so tolerant.
If, when defending your support for Donald Trump, and your response is,
"But but but... HILLARY!!!", then you lost the argument before you even began.