False. Employers have a legal responsibility to ensure a safe and harassment free workplace. Trying to drive somebody out of his job can absolutely run afoul of this requirement.1.) wrong YOU made the claim its not a businesses matter, they it shouldnt be talked about there that is your opinion
And its not a question of thinking and saying Eich is wrong; its driving him out of his job is the problem.
Yes-- this whole issue had nothing to do with Eich at his job. He expressed his opinion off the job, it was found out a few years later, and people who did not like it tried, and succeeded, in getting him pushed out. Silencing him.2.) no one claimed he pushed it on them but the fact is he did try and
Its probably best not to have political discussions at work, since after all you are work, and are expected to work and not have political discussions. Its probably not a good idea to discuss such political issues after work hours, as that can poison the well.3.) so now you take back what you said, you said keep it out the work place, they have ever right to discuss it there
But what happened at Mozzilla wasn't that people said 'I dissagree with Eich and I am going to-- give money to lamda, write a letter to the local paper ect ect ect.' It was - 'We are going to work to get rid of him, because we don't like what he says.'
As above4.) see 4 now you are posting more lies you dont want them to say it at work you want to take their rights away you said it in post 1353
Absolutely.5.) nope not two different subjects at all they have every single right to their speech no matter what your opinion of their speech is
You are behind the times. Bakers and photographers can face legal sanction if they decline to take a gay couple marrying as customers, because they are gay, and because said baker et. al. oppose such activities. They do not have free speech on this issue.6.) wrong again all customers and employees have free speech
Oh-- the bakers don't have free speech rights then?7.) correct because this is ILLEGAL and BREAKS THE LAW and violates peoples RIGHTS
Of course, if a baker can be compelled to bake a wedding cake against his or will, why couldn't OKCupid be compelled to continue using Mozzilla? Doesn't Eich have a right to be anti-gay marriage? Certainly, Eich was harmed and certainly Mozzilla would have been harmed by the actions of OKCupid. "Action" is what makes the difference, yes?
Oh I see-- free speech is just one of many competing rights. It is of no greater significance than other rights.8.) yes they do they just cant violate the rights as others as facts, law, rights and court cases show
this is no new concept try to keep up