• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mozilla’s CEO steps down amid gay marriage furor[W:577]

You are free to do so but since you invented the whole thing its pretty meaningless
But I do agree with you 100%, that voice you made up in your head does sound like an asshole!
The crazy assumptions you came up with that were nothing like my post in any context or even verbiage what so ever seemed very pompous and ignorant.

IM glad i didnt actually write any of that retarded **** you posted and it was just made up in your head :)

feel free to answer any of those questions by the way.
Id like to know how you thought my post addressed everybody and called them MFers when only 3-5 people were crying about the speech they didnt like. And also what about that fact led you to the conclusion that it made me awesome lol

You could be a great fantasy writer
FFS I wasn't being literal. I was presenting an impression to get the point across.

You're all "in X number of pages, no one has come up with a good response to FACTS!"

Then 20 pages later you say the same thing.

It makes me think of an asshole crowing about how his side is still winning. Sure, he's right, but that only makes it WORSE. You WANT him to be wrong just so he'll stop. Even though you know it's wrong to want that.
 
FFS I wasn't being literal. I was presenting an impression to get the point across.

You're all "in X number of pages, no one has come up with a good response to FACTS!"

Then 20 pages later you say the same thing.

It makes me think of an asshole crowing about how his side is still winning. Sure, he's right, but that only makes it WORSE. You WANT him to be wrong just so he'll stop. Even though you know it's wrong to want that.

again this just seems illogical to me
this is the part i dont get.


whos side are you talking about?
I have no side? in fact in this thread i havent even support a "side"
and how does one(a person) actually "win" if there is no side?

can you tell me what the sides of this thread are?

so im understanding. 3-4 people bashed one group of people practicing free speech and cheered others, some even denied it was free speech for the gorup they dont like. So when I ask for an example and it is ignored thats "my side winning"???

interesting . . . .

my only point was to see if those 3-4 posters could try to defend their factually false claim or could simply just admit they were wrong saying it wasnt free speech.

I know i simply admit when i make a mistake and i seen you do the same. This is why i treat you with integrity and dont play shoot the fish in the barrel with you no matter what you say. :shrug:

some people are incapable of that
 
again this just seems illogical to me
this is the part i dont get.


whos side are you talking about?
I have no side? in fact in this thread i havent even support a "side"
and how does one(a person) actually "win" if there is no side?

can you tell me what the sides of this thread are?

so im understanding. 3-4 people bashed one group of people practicing free speech and cheered others, some even denied it was free speech for the gorup they dont like. So when I ask for an example and it is ignored thats "my side winning"???

interesting . . . .

my only point was to see if those 3-4 posters could try to defend their factually false claim or could simply just admit they were wrong saying it wasnt free speech.

I know i simply admit when i make a mistake and i seen you do the same. This is why i treat you with integrity and dont play shoot the fish in the barrel with you no matter what you say. :shrug:

some people are incapable of that
Not just this thread. Many topics you comment on give me this impression, or something like that.


I dunno, really.

I suppose your posting style just grates on my nerves for some reason.
 
Not just this thread. Many topics you comment on give me this impression, or something like that.


I dunno, really.

I suppose your posting style just grates on my nerves for some reason.
well youll find me doing that most places where where somebody was blatantly dishonest

unfortunately theres thats not rare, If i could make it rare i would but thats not my call :shrug:
 
well youll find me doing that most places where where somebody was blatantly dishonest

unfortunately theres thats not rare, If i could make it rare i would but thats not my call :shrug:
I'm perfectly find with calling out stupidity and the like.

Do it myself, in my own way.

I just disagree with your style and methods, I suppose. They grate.
 
I'm perfectly find with calling out stupidity and the like.

Do it myself, in my own way.

I just disagree with your style and methods, I suppose. They grate.

Well id use different ones but these are the easiest and most direct and effective.
I have told CC that I wish i had his patience with dealing with those types of people. And while occasionally i will try his style, typically i just dont care that much.

In real life im super patient, i do a lot of work with kids (6-18) besides my real job and what not but here, if i wast to much time, I could miss a REAL conversation or one actually interesting or factually etc.
 
I'm perfectly find with calling out stupidity and the like.

Do it myself, in my own way.

I just disagree with your style and methods, I suppose. They grate.

Still find it odd that something grates thats not directed at you

but hey to each his own :)
 
Still find it odd that something grates thats not directed at you

but hey to each his own :)

The New Enemies Lists - Charles Krauthammer, Washington Post

". . . . I had not foreseen how donor lists would be used not to ferret out corruption but to pursue and persecute citizens with contrary views. Which corrupts the very idea of full disclosure. It is now an invitation to the creation of enemies lists. Containing, for example, Brendan Eich, forced to resign as Mozilla CEO when it was disclosed that six years earlier he’d given $1,000 to support a referendum banning gay marriage. He was hardly the first. Activists compiled blacklists of donors to Proposition 8 and went after them. Indeed, shortly after the referendum passed, both the artistic director of the California Musical Theatre in Sacramento and the president of the Los Angeles Film Festival were hounded out of office. . . . ":peace
 
The New Enemies Lists - Charles Krauthammer, Washington Post

". . . . I had not foreseen how donor lists would be used not to ferret out corruption but to pursue and persecute citizens with contrary views. Which corrupts the very idea of full disclosure. It is now an invitation to the creation of enemies lists. Containing, for example, Brendan Eich, forced to resign as Mozilla CEO when it was disclosed that six years earlier he’d given $1,000 to support a referendum banning gay marriage. He was hardly the first. Activists compiled blacklists of donors to Proposition 8 and went after them. Indeed, shortly after the referendum passed, both the artistic director of the California Musical Theatre in Sacramento and the president of the Los Angeles Film Festival were hounded out of office. . . . ":peace

more examples of free speech that bother you, let me know when you have a solution. Whether i agree with the reason or not Boycotting is legal:shrug:
 
Back
Top Bottom