Sometimes I think we're alone. Sometimes I think we're not. In either case, the thought is staggering. ~ R. Buckminster Fuller
And Hillary couldn't be the CEo of Mozilla either under the same standards....
Hillary Clinton can't be president of Mozilla, United States | The Daily CallerIn 2006, Senator Clinton voted against a proposed federal marriage amendment, but asserted marriage is “not just a bond, but a sacred bond between a man and a woman.” She added that she believed “the fundamental bedrock principle that [marriage] exists between a man and a woman going back into the mists of history as one of the founding foundational institutions of history and humanity and civilization, and that its primary, principle role during those millennia has been the raising and socializing of children for the society into which they are to become adults.”
Clinton continued to oppose same-sex marriage as a Democratic presidential candidate in 2008, the same year Prop 8 passed. During that campaign she said, “I believe that DOMA served a very important purpose.”
teaching your own
that gay marriage is wrong or being gay is wrong is not bigotry
trying to deni them rights or treating them as leasers is bigotry
theres a HUGE difference.
there are lots of people that feel marriage is a man woman thing personally but they fully support equal rights because they respect peoples rights
Results for: $1 or more, $1,000 or less, donors supporting - Proposition 8 Campaign Contributions - Los Angeles Times
I mean, all these people and organizations are bigots in California, right? Just think how much better California would be with all these bigots punished. With all these people's free speech, as defined by SOCUTS ruling, abridged.
My gosh, it's almost as bad a having lost your rights or something. Oh wait. LGBT won that fight, and now the LGBT community is right in taking retribution?
Better get going on this, there are 91,575 left to go.
nope i stand with free speech and rights the rest you are desperately trying to make up and nobody educated and honest buys it l
you ready to answer the questions or you gonna dodge them again
well thats tricky
the fact is free speech will, it has no choice because free speech applies to us all.
the only way speech would not effect our job is if we didnt have it or only some of us did
the should is a matter of opinion and nothing else.
the fact is it can and thats the only way it works.
whats your solution to fix it?
"It's always reassuring to find you've made the right enemies." -- William J. Donovan
I do not believe that forcing someone out of their livelihood because of their exercise of free speech is justifiable.
This is exactly what the LGBT community engaged in, and I see it as a dangerous precedent, for any group to exercise this level of impact on someone they disagree with.
What happened to the most honorable 'I disagree with you completely, but support you right to say it'? Has that been cast to the way side?