One who makes himself a worm cannot complain when tread upon.
The difference between liberals and conservatives, in simple terms, may be that liberals want to tell you what you can and can't do and what you must and must not do while conservatives want to ensure that what you want to do can be done safely and not adversely impact the enjoyment of life of all other citizens. Absolutely, there are extreme views on both ends of the spectrum, but I think you'll find, in a general sense, that liberals create legislation that intrudes on individual lives while conservatives create legislation to mitigate the effects of liberal intrusion into personal lives.
A Canadian conservative is one who believes in limited government and that the government should stay out of our wallets and out of our bedrooms.
“When buying and selling are controlled by legislation, the first things to be bought and sold are legislators.” - P. J. O’Rourke
“Socialism is great until you run out of someone elses money” Margaret Thatcher
Conservatives cheer when innocent human life if protected. Imagine that!
What are individual needs? Can anyone predict with any certainty what illness or accident will befall them? The need is to cover medical expenses as they occur, nothing more nothing less.Before this mandatory health care, health care cost less and offered more of what an individual needs
Lets not make this political, but other than that corporate greed comes back to mind.Also, the medical community, with all it's flaws, ran much smoother than it does now under the control of the Obama administration.
I bet SCOTUS kills it
you want support for this bill that obviously IMO violates the constitution since RvW exists do the following:
have a bill that the MEDICAL COMMUNITY supports/sanctions and writes that is actually about SAFETY, currently they are against this and had nothing to do with it as linked in other threads
have a bill that applies to ALL MEDICAL facilities that do procedures of the same medical/surgery rating instead of intellectually dishonesty and biasedly targeting places that do abortions and ignoring others. Educated and objective people see through such hypocrisy
have a bill that does not violate RvW
I myself would like RvW changed some and rights legislated for a ZEF but i dont want that done by violating people's rights.
If SCOTUS holds this up, which i seriously doubt, so be it they will have to explain thier ruling and show why this doesnt violate rights or make a ruling that revamps RvW.