• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263:617]

Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

They have the right to tax me to pay for military equipment, bought from third parties, even though I've never declared war on anybody

They don't tax you if you don't personally purchase military equipment. The discussion isn't about government spending. It's about taxing citizens for not purchasing something.
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

Um, yes, we already knew that. And?

Your question asked about the govt's power to tax people who didn't buy healthcare

SCOTUS says the govt has that power.
They don't tax you if you don't personally purchase military equipment. The discussion isn't about government spending. It's about taxing citizens for not purchasing something.

Doesn't matter. You are making a distinction

You don't get to decide the parameters of the discussion.
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

Your question asked about the govt's power to tax people who didn't buy healthcare

SCOTUS says the govt has that power.

My question? Which question was that? I'm the one who said it was a tax, not a fine.

Healthcare insurance, not healthcare. Nobody is taxed if they don't buy healthcare.
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

The govt isn't forcing anyone to buy insurance



Actually, it is

Actually, it isn't. The discussion still isn't about government spending. It's about taxing individual citizens for not purchasing a third party good or service.
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

My question? Which question was that? I'm the one who said it was a tax, not a fine.

Healthcare insurance, not healthcare. Nobody is taxed if they don't buy healthcare.

I left the word "insurance" out. BFD

The point, the govt has the power to assess a tax penalty if you don't buy health insurance.
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

Actually, it isn't. The discussion still isn't about government spending. It's about taxing individual citizens for not purchasing a third party good or service.

Actually it is, but as I have pointed out to you, the govt has the power to assess a tax penalty if you don't buy health insurance.
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

Your question asked about the govt's power to tax people who didn't buy healthcare

SCOTUS says the govt has that power.


Doesn't matter. You are making a distinction

You don't get to decide the parameters of the discussion.

I didn't say I get to decide anything. But I can certainly point out to posters that their posts aren't in context with the discussion.
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

Actually it is, but as I have pointed out to you, the govt has the power to assess a tax penalty if you don't buy health insurance.

And we all already knew that. Why do you keep repeating it? I'm the one who said it was a tax, not a fine.
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

And we all already knew that. Why do you keep repeating it? I'm the one who said it was a tax, not a fine.

As long as you keep responding to my point that the govt has the power to assess a tax penalty if you don't buy health insurance, I will keep repeating the fact that the govt has the power to assess a tax penalty if you don't buy health insurance.
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

As long as you keep responding to my point that the govt has the power to assess a tax penalty if you don't buy health insurance, I will keep repeating the fact that the govt has the power to assess a tax penalty if you don't buy health insurance.

We already knew that. I'm the one who pointed out that it's a tax, as defined by SCOTUS.
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

Yes, you can be as wrong as you want to be

The government handing out water and electricity to the poor has nothing to do with citizens being taxed for not buying a third party's goods or services.
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

We already knew that. I'm the one who pointed out that it's a tax, as defined by SCOTUS.

BFD

The govt has the power to assess a tax penalty if you don't buy health insurance. No one is forced to buy health insurance
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

I'm still waiting to find out what else we can be taxed for not purchasing from a third party.

And people keep saying the government isn't forcing people to buy anything. So apparently there is no individual mandate.
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

I'm still waiting to find out what else we can be taxed for not purchasing from a third party.

Go ahead and wait.
And people keep saying the government isn't forcing people to buy anything. So apparently there is no individual mandate.

The govt isn't forcing anyone to buy health insurance
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

Yes it does

No it doesn't. They don't tax you if you don't buy electricity. They don't tax you if you don't buy tap water.

The individual mandate is being discussed, not government spending.
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

BFD

The govt has the power to assess a tax penalty if you don't buy health insurance. No one is forced to buy health insurance

Right. So there is no individual mandate.
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

No it doesn't. They don't tax you if you don't buy electricity. They don't tax you if you don't buy tap water.

So what? That has nothing to do with this discussion

The individual mandate is being discussed, not government spending.

Actually, we were talking about the tax penalty, which is not "government spending"
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

So what? That has nothing to do with this discussion



Actually, we were talking about the tax penalty, which is not "government spending"

"we"? You weren't part of that discussion, if you look again. Those of us who were discussing it weren't talking about the government giving people water and electricity.

So there is no individual mandate. Interesting. I thought it was written into the law in order to ensure the law works.
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

"we"? You weren't part of that discussion, if you look again.

I am now

Those of us who were discussing it weren't talking about the government giving people water and electricity.

minnie was.

So there is no individual mandate. Interesting. I thought it was written into the law in order to ensure the law works.

You have now been reduced to making stuff up and pretending I said it.

Well played, Ma'am!! :lamo
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

By the way, thank you for pointing out the government providing water and electricity for the poor has nothing to do with the discussion. That's what I said earlier to someone else that you didn't like.
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

So what? That has nothing to do with this discussion



Actually, we were talking about the tax penalty, which is not "government spending"

Eventually you are going to come to the reality that you are in the minority and thus the losing side of this issue. This country wasn't built on your vision of a large central govt. providing you with personal responsibility issues. You and I have absolutely nothing in common as my vision rests on personal responsibility, neighbor helping neighbor, and most social issues resting at the state and local level. Yours is one that supports a Federal bureaucracy that has generated a 17.3 trillion dollar debt and rising.
 
Re: Obamacare tops 6 million signups [W:263]

So wait, now there IS a requirement to purchase insurance? Before there wasn't. Make up your mind.

Is there an individual mandate to purchase insurance, or is there not one?

Yes there is, or no there is not.
 
Back
Top Bottom