Americans wouldn't re-elect a president after a terrorist attack overseas on an embassy?
Hell in 2004 we re-elected a President after a major terrorists attack on US soil.
We re-elected Clinton after overseas terrorist attacks. How about terrorism under other presidents?
I guess it's a little far fetched that the President would actually run a cover up on something with so little to gain from a cover up. I guess it would be a little more plausible if there was something he had to gain from it.
“Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.” John Maynard Keynes
“I think if Thomas Jefferson were looking down, the author of the Bill of Rights, on what’s being proposed here, he’d agree with it. He would agree that the First Amendment cannot be absolute.” - Chuck Schumer (D). Yet, Madison and Mason wrote the Bill of Rights, according to Sheila Jackson Lee, 400 years ago. Yup, it's a fact.
Please show one instance where a "report" from outside the White House has EVER been issued clearing the Obama administration of such things as Benghazi, the IRS corruption scandal and I will consider the above as something more than yet another ignorant, knee jerk response to the least criticism. Please demonstrate how and when the "left" has even co-operated with an investigation and I will actually reconsider my contention that all of Obamaland to be the thin skinned "my guy is perfect" hypocrites YOU are. I mean when your guy lies 40 times to buy himself a second term, then lies to cover that lie, where do any of you get off calling anyone hypocrite?
Show me where YOU called Obama on that one?
"Small people talk about people, average people talk about events, great people talk about ideas" Eleanor Roosevelt
So Christie exonerated Christie with most of the one million dollars coming from GOPs in New Jersey since GOPs pay more taxes.
Cantor wait for the primaries .
Chemists Have Solutions .