I have conceded that by themselves the pictures are not absolute proof. And although it is certainly true that hundreds of thousands of pictures with various foreign officials is meaningless, these pictures are certainly full of meaning.
What makes these more special than the multitudes of others? Why are they important but others are not? Why do they indicate conspiracy while the others do not?
First of all Victoria Nuland is pictured passing out cookies to protesters right after Yanukovych rejected a EU deal in favor of one offered by Russia. Do you think she is passing out cookies just because she's a sweet little old lady? Hell no! It demonstrates that she is not pleased with the decision.
She's doing it to show the protesters that the US supports them in spirit. If the US was supporting them via the CIA, what would the benefit of doing that be?
Next of all, there is a call, which she had to apologize for, where she is clearly telling a subordinate to "f*ck the EU." Why? Because she doesn't want them in the way of what she's trying to do. Then she says "Yats is the man." Damn!!! That's practically spelling it out. Then she is pictured with not only with Yarsenyi Yatsenyuk, but Vitali Klitschko, and Oleh Tyahnybok as well. This is after she has said
That's not spelling it out. That's her telling someone who she thinks is going to be in charge. And then her trying to cozy up to them. Doing what a diplomat is supposed to do, in other words. Would it have been better if she were wrong? Is that what US diplomats should do now? Try to be wrong, in case their opinions are leaked at a later date, because people on the internet might think there was a conspiracy?
There she is with all three. Just a coincidence?
No, not at all. It's absolutely not a coincidence. She purposely is trying to make in-roads with the people that she and her office believe will become the most powerful people in Ukraine.
That's her job. If she was secretly making them become the most powerful people, why pose with them in a picture? Kinda defeats the purpose of "secret".
Then guess who just so happens to become Prime Minister of Ukraine? None other than Yarsenyi Yatsenyuk. That's right, good old Yats. Then when you take that in the context of the known fact that the United States engages in the overthrow of leaders of countries that it doesn't like, it is very, very powerful evidence. You would have to be stupid to not at least admit that it is very possible that the US played a strong role in the installation of Yarsenyi Yatsenyuk as prime minister.
It's extremely slight evidence. Like...extremely slight. When you consider the number of changes of government that the US doesn't play a part in, and the amount of power players that US diplomats meet with, it means basically nothing. US diplomats meet with all the senior members of both of Taiwan's major political groups, as well as their minor groups. As well as their military. The same with Japan. South Korea. Germany. France. India. Malaysia. Indonesia. And many more (most, actually...of course they're not meeting with any other parties leadership in China, for example, for obvious reasons). If and when there's unrest there, and a diplomat makes a phone call and predicts who's gonna be next in power...is that all now "very, very powerful evidence" of the US-created coup?
To you, I guess, it will be.